Employer needs to give a warning and if he or she repeats the offense, a second and third warning must be given. We cannot simply ignore employee who “disappear” from work. Make an effort to find out whether they have quit or whether they are dealing with some personal emergency which would excuse their absence. Theft If you catch any employee stealing company property, including cash, you need to take firm action. The Industrial Courts has no sympathy with employees who steal from their employers.
Lesdor terminated the joint venture agreement with Cordon on the basis of Cordon’s unwillingness to properly complete the work and claimed damages for defective work. Cordon commenced proceedings against Lesdor on the basis that Lesdor’s purported termination amounted to repudiation and claimed damages for resulting loss. Lesdor cross-claimed for damages resulting from Cordon’s defective work. Finding The Court found that the works had not achieved “completion” which the Court interpreted to mean “full completion”. Accordingly, Lesdor was not required to sign the strata plan and, following Cordon’s unwillingness to properly complete the work, Lesdor had lawfully terminated the
Maya stork will not be liable for the cost of the expensive shampoo and shower gels purchased from the suppliers. The suppliers will file a case against Kallessi McTavish for her irresponsible behaviour. the procedure of RATIFICATION is fulfilled as there is a principal in existence (Kallessi McTavish). The case of Watteau v Fenwick  is similar to the case which we are dealing with, Kallessi McTavish v Maya Stork. The manager of public house was prohibited from buying goods for the business- all the goods were to be supplied by the principal, his employer.
Had the defendant started his business while still employed and obtained customer information, then he would be liable as it was held in the case of Wessex Dairies v Smith (1935) 2 KB 80 where an employee was held liable for soliciting his masters customers to transfer their custom to himself, even though the transfer was to take effect only after he terminated his services , but in this case Rembrandt Chenayi Jangano is not in breach of the duty as the soliciting of customers only occurred after the termination of his services. The plaintiff company was unable to establish that the defendant breached his duty of fidelity during his employment by diverting business for his own
On the contrary, nothing was agreed upon concerning the payment of a cancellation fee. “The seed from which discord between the parties and the arbitrators grew” was that the arbitrators, after being appointed, requested inter alia the entitlement to the payment of that fee if the hearing was
The court appointed an arbitrator to consider the case who decided that Rylands and Horrocks are not liable for Fetcher as they did not know about the mine shafts, and considered the contractors liable for negligence. Later on,
Both sides refused to accept the decision of the SAR, but the judge dismissed them in court. Federal Court ordered the revocation on the basis of misrepresentation of contract fraud so the assessment of damage should not be breach of contract, it will be the plaintiff's position, even though the contract has been executed base on the basis of the contract but has been released,
The duty to be a whistle-blower over rides the duty that you have to your client or employer. The failure to report unethical or dangerous behaviour of an employer can result in the revoking of your licence, even if it does not result in serious injury or loss of life. (Bouville, 2007) What is whistle-blowing?
A Manager may not pass on information to an employee working on the frontline of a business eg: an amendment to an order came in via phone and stock invoice was not changed to reflect this. Outcome the customer is not receiving the goods he ordered, he in turn cannot meet supply and demand. It will be the frontline employee who will have to deal with the dispute/ complaint, try and build on repairing the damage / friction due to poor communication, so that future business will continue and relationship
Also, he is unable to manage all the floors of the megastore by himself. Usually, he misses something or the other due to acute customer pressure and by managing more than 100 staff members. All these incidents have led to a customer base that is agitated and angry with big bazaar. Such incidents in one store of Big Bazaar discourages customers to visit other branches as well. Many consumer complaints online, bad customer feedback and angry customers have made the management think so as to control the situation.