Throughout the NCAA sports world, there has been a lot of talk about college athletes getting paid to play at a certain college. As paying college athletes has become a very controversial and touchy topic, there has be assumptions that the University of Arizona has been paid a freshman basketball player, DeAndre Ayton $100,000 to make sure that he would commit to the Arizona Wildcats program. DeAndre Ayton is a seven foot one inch center that can play both defense and offensive at a very high level, but now has been under FBI investigation the whole basketball season, yet he is still averaging around nineteen points per game and over ten rebounds. Yes, he is getting paid a very large amount of money, but is that such a bad thing? There are …show more content…
According to Marc Edelman, “An average division one college athlete puts in about 43.3 hours per week, bouncing from the field/court, weight room, and film session, that is more about 3.3 hours more that the average full-time job and they receive a salary. “(2014, para 3) And yet all they can receive, is a pat on the back and a “good job” compliment. While these athletes are bringing in massive amounts of money into their schools on a daily basis, the athletes only get to see that the money goes to their coaches, facilities, and school, which is not terrible but still could be better for the amount of money they bring in. According to Jeff Cockrell, “Among 127 of the 131 schools in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Football Bowl Subdivision, the average revenues from football alone exceed $30 million. The NCAA itself a large portion of whose revenues come from its recently completed men’s basketball tournament raked in more than $1 billion in 2017.” (2018, para 1) One Billion dollars in the month of March along was made, with having just under seventy games played, that’s almost fifteen million dollars made per game and not a single one of those athletes get to touch that money. With sixty seven games getting played in the month of march, those student athletes are forced to miss a ton of class depending on how far they go in the March
You might be thinking what exactly qualifies as annual revenue. Annual revenue can come from ticket sales, the sale of broadcast rights, sponsorship rights, and a number of other sources. 50 colleges reported that they had annual revenues of over $50 million. Though less 5 colleges reported to have had annual revenues of an outstanding $100 million. This seems like a lot of money to not be sharing with student-athletes.
Are you a students-athlete in need of compensation from the sport you love? There is a possibility of getting this kind of money from playing certain levels in sports. Paying college athletes has been and always will be an ongoing argument. I divine that paying these athletes will help students financial futures, help the costs of abrasions to the students themselves, and bring in prodigious amounts of money. Initially, paying college athletes will help them create a sense of financial awareness.
If college athletes were being paid more athletes would remain in school, instead of dropping out for hopes of making it to the professionals (Griffin 17). If the athletes were being paid they’d stay in school and have a “better” look at life. It is not an irrational statement to claim that Division One Athletes should get paid due to time and revenue put into the un iversities. Adolf Hitler once said “Give me an athlete and I’ll give you an army”, this is indeed evident that college athletes should not get paid to play.
Just from March Madness, the NCAA is stood to make over $900 million in revenue (Investopedia). “Basically, March Madness is the NCAA’s bread and butter. College athletics’ governing body will earn somewhere around $900 million in revenue from the tournament, representing about 90% of its annual revenue. On the surface that seems like cause for outrage, especially in light of how much the players earn: nothing.” (Investopedia)
College sports have become a big business in recent years, with universities and the NCAA earning billions of dollars in revenue from television deals, merchandise sales, and other sources. However, the athletes who generate this revenue are not compensated for their participation in sports. This has led to a growing debate about whether college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports. The exploitation of college athletes and the significant revenue they generate for universities and the NCAA without any direct compensation for their participation in sports necessitates the need for paying them. This would not only address their financial challenges and ensure a level playing field but also provide fair compensation for their
Throughout the past few years, countless arguments have been made regarding if college athletes should get paid. Dismissing the Name, Image, and Likeness deal (NIL) and how athletes receive compensation for that matter, they do not obtain money like a salary. Despite the fact that the athletes are the ones who agree to continue their sport at an advanced level with the knowledge of no pay, they should at least gain a slight amount of income before, during, and after their season. These athletes play for the NCAA, National College Athletic Association, and they draw in a great deal of revenue, but do not acquire the same in return along with their effort, drive, and enthusiasm. Being a college athlete is predominantly a full-time job, so if
Division one college athletics, especially basketball and football, are some of the most popular events in the country. In 2017, the College Football Playoff Championship game was the tenth-most viewed television program in the U.S. at 24.42 million total viewers, and the NCAA Men’s basketball championship game was the thirteenth-most at 23.01 million total viewers (Mitchell). This means that college sports generate large amounts at money from television ratings and exposure. Lots of money is also made by colleges from merchandise sold due to recognition gained by their sports teams. Because of this, many people believe that college athletes should be paid to play their sports.
College athletics is a multimillion dollar industry, and this revenue generates profits for multiple different parties such as administrators, coaches, and local communities. According to the Department of Education, college sports programs acquired $14 billion in 2019, which is an increase in $10 billion since 2003. This highlights the rapidly rising revenue rate of collegiate athletic programs over the past years. Since the players are the individuals making each of these programs a success and producing proceeds, they should earn a salary. Without the players, the organizations would not be able to produce such soaring
NCAA has various views on college athletes getting paid. On NCAA.org, they push for more success in academics than in athletics. School work will be put before the time spent on the court to ensure that they know their main purpose for going to that specific college, according to NCAA. For the people who like to give their opinions on the situation, the past years have seen good days and bad days in where as people, even fans,think that college athletes are somehow not given enough benefits. NCAA states, Most of the money made off of the athletic program doesn’t go to the people that actually make the profits rise.
After dissecting the dilemma of payment for college athletes, one may discover that oftentimes the only incentive college athletes receive is a full athletic scholarship to the college/university, as opposed to a salary. There must be a reason as to why the college athletes do not receive a salary even though they generate billions of dollars for the NCAA. There are numerous sources illustrating pros and cons regarding whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Some argue that athletes should be paid because they are forced to endure unhealthy environments and unfair treatment, struggle through the “plantation system”, want support for themselves, etc. Opposers of this argument state that athletes should not be paid because of financial irresponsibility, education equaling money, university offering more than education, loss of passion for the game, etc.
His use of economical analysis on the possibilities of paying college athletes further deems the article valid when he quotes, “While from an ethical standpoint it may not be appropriate for the NCAA and universities to make millions of dollars off free labor, there are too many economic implications and consequences that make it difficult to pay college athletes.” (Marcus) His personal opinion is unseen as he provides the audience with statistical examination following
Time and Effort Some people think college athletes should be paid for playing collegiate sports because of all the time and effort they put into the sport. All of these athletes have to be to practice everyday. This takes time out of their day that they could be using to study, do homework, or even just enjoying time with friends. This makes time in the classroom harder for them than any other student involved with schooling.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Colleges are scouting or looking at kids from the age of ten years old. For March Madness (college basketball tournament) a student athlete would miss up to six days of class that they would have to make up later on, due to traveling and having to be with the team. Football player dedicate 43.3 hours of their own life to college sports. Whether it’s going to the weight room, film sessions, or just putting some type of work for the team. It is also more common for athletes who play football or basketball to go pro than in any other college sport.