ipl-logo

Colonial America Pros And Cons

1120 Words5 Pages

Since the settlement of colonial American and the migration of individuals from different ethnicities and backgrounds, the United States of America has been as a melting pot. After the immigration of former Europeans, to colonial Americans, citizens felt displaced with the lack of national identity from 1810 to 1840. Politically, the United States lacked a problem of representation within their government. As former members of Great Britain, Americans were only aware of what they did not want, a monarchy, which led to their dismissal. Voting, Americans could not justify a system that allowed everyone to feel satisfied with. In particular, New Jersey, allocated the plan of one vote per state, which worked for their substantially smaller population …show more content…

McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohen v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden all served great significance to judicial nationalism due to their American legal system impact. The court case of McCulloch v. Maryland was caused due to the dispute between Maryland and the federal government regarding the constitutionality of a tax on the Bank of the United States (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). It was determined that the creation of a national bank was an implied power, through the Necessary and Proper Clause. With this expression of power, the state of Maryland was unable to interfere, resulting in the affirmed supremacy of federal laws over state powers (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). The McCulloch v. Maryland court case allowed for the priniciple of implied powers to settle in, extending the meaning of federal authority within the United States. In the case of Cohen v. Virginia, the case concerned the legality of lottery tickets, between the state of Virginia, and a private citizen, Cohen. With the influence of the Supreme Court, it was deemed that the Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction over state court cases when federal questions were involved, leading to the dedicison that federal judiciary possessed the power to review and overturn court decisions made by state courts (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826). This process was established as the prinicple of judicial review. In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, a dispute occurred between two individuals, Gibbons and Ogden, both steamboat operators. The dispute arose over the usage of waterways between the states of New York and New Jersey. It was decided by the Supreme Court that Congress possessed exclusive power in order to regular interstate commerce, which was protected by the Commerce Clause. The Constitution’s Commerce Clause demonstrated that itwas unconstituaional for

Show More
Related

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    839 Words  | 4 Pages

    National supremacy McCulloch v. Maryland was a supreme court case held back in 1819 concerning the topic of national bank and taxation. This court was like many more that came before it and after it as it was the national government and states government arguing in front of the supreme court. The bank was a national bank created in Maryland being the second ever created national bank. The case all took course after Maryland the state questioned the power of Congress being able to create a national bank. Then the state of Maryland imposed a tax on all branches of bank not “chartered by the legislature.”

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Study Of Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

    886 Words  | 4 Pages

    Webster argued the Constitution was design to settle such economic disputes between states. Allowing concurrent laws to conflict would be dangerous and contagious if not handled by the federal government. Attorney Writ supported the federal supremacy over these states was enumerated in the Constitution. Gibbons’ steamboats operated “among several states” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.), and the Commerce Clause states, “ Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several States, and with Indian tribes” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.). Gibbons’ steamboats in fact operated in New Jersey and in New York; therefore it aptly applied in this situation.

    Read More

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    In regards to Maryland's argument of state sovereignty, Chief Justice Marshall argued that the Constitution is "an instrument of the people". Although, it was ratified by the state conventions it is for the people, not the states. Lastly, Marshall stated that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy", which was a direct attack to the federal government. There were no concurrent opinions written for this

    Read More

  • Mcculloch V. Maryland Case

    319 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the United States history, there have been events that have impacted the course and development of politics, becoming part of what is currently, and the McCulloch v. Maryland case has been one of the most influential events in the economic area. In addition, I believe that the courage that McCulloch had to refuse to pay the taxes imposed by Maryland was an elemental key part to continue with the processes of the growth of the United States National Bank and the regulation of the coin produced by the state banks; bringing at the end a financial balance. Furthermore, in a deeper insight, it promoted the analysis of the power of the Congress and the Constitution, because at the beginning the Constitution was taken as a literal explanation

    Read More

  • Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

    233 Words  | 1 Pages

    Gibbons v. Ogden was a court case which debated the right to carry passengers along a canal from New York to New Jersey. This established more federal authority over the states which caused animosity throughout the country. The “corrupt bargain” occurred out of the Election of 1824 in which

    Read More

  • Mccullouch V. Maryland Case Study

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    Johnson wrote,” When speaking of the power of Congress over navigation, I do not regard it as a power incidental to that of regulating commerce; I consider it as the thing itself,” Irrefutably, Gibbons v. Ogden demonstrated the supreme power of the federal government over state governments and the federal governments ability to continuously weaken the role of the

    Read More

  • Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Analysis

    729 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ogden, which was about New York requiring out-of-state boats to pay fees to go through there waters. A man named Thomas Gibbons who owned a steam boat that went through New Jersey and New York waters everyday challenged the States monopoly. The case eventually went to the Supreme Court where Chief Justice John Marshall said that those state laws weren't valid since it didn't work with the congressional act. The state of New York had created a law that allowed them to earn money, but the government didn't like the idea that the state was regulating its waters so they voided the law. In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the state of Maryland placed a tax on the Second Bank of the United States.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of England's Colonization Of The New World

    640 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nation States were instrumental in funding voyages and improving the human condition during the age of exploration. England, a Nation State, helped bridge the New World and Old World together. Together they created an array of wealth and opportunity, which as a result bettered the lives of both the people in England, and the settlers of the New World. England’s colonization of the New World was beneficial to the English, but detrimental to the lives of the poor and natives of the New World. Despite the negatives, England as a Nation State vastly improved the human condition of the English people.

    Read More

  • Mcculloch V. Maryland

    236 Words  | 1 Pages

    The significance of this triad is that Dartmouth, McColloch, and Gibbons are three landmark Supreme Court cases decided by Chief Justice John Marshall that affected the interpretation of the Constitution and the federal government’s powers. Dartmouth College v. Woodward was decided in 1819 and found that the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution which says no State shall make any law impairing the obligation of contracts was good law. It separated public and private charters and created the American business corporation and the free enterprise system. McCulloch v. Maryland was decided in 1819 and allowed the Federal government to pass laws not expressly provided for in the Constitution’s list of enumerated powers. It further developed the

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Impact On American History

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    In both the McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden cases, John Marshall asserted the power of judicial review, and legitimatized the Supreme Court within the national government. The Marshall Court, over the span of thirty years, managed to influence the life of every American by aiding in the development of the judicial branch and establishing a boundary between the state and national government. John Marshall’s Supreme Court cases shaped how the government is organized today. He strongly believed in Federalism, and that the national government should be sovereign, rather than the states. The Supreme Court under John

    Read More

  • Essay On Marbury Vs Madison Case

    749 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1803, the Marbury v. Madison case was brought before the Supreme Court. The plaintiff was Federalist William Marbury and, through the principle of judicial review, he wanted the Court to issue a writ of mandamus so that he can receive official documents from the Secretary of State. Marbury claimed that it was unconstitutional for Madison to withhold the commission, but James Madison was under orders from the president, who could ignore court decisions. This case helped solidate the Supreme Court’s position and power as a branch of government equal to the Legislative and Executive branches.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison

    186 Words  | 1 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was heard in 1803 and is considered a landmark United States Supreme Court case which helped the Court form the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under a new article of the Constitution. This was a landmark decision because it helped to define the difference in power between the executive and judicial branches of the American government. It was the first time that a court ruled that they had the power to declare an act of Congress void if it is not consistent with the values of the Constitution. McCulloch v. Maryland was decided by the Supreme Court in 1819, and was known for asserting national supremacy for state action in areas of their constitutionally granted authority.

    Read More

  • Power Of The Federal Government In The 19th Century

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court case McCulloch v Maryland originally originated in Maryland when the Maryland legislature decided to levy a tax on all branches of the banks. It was aimed to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States. James McCulloch was a cashier at the Baltimore branch. He was issuing bank notes without complying with the Maryland law. Maryland had sued McCulloch for refusing to pay the taxes under the Maryland statute.

    Read More

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    2098 Words  | 9 Pages

    McCulloch v. Maryland McCulloch v. Maryland is a United States supreme court case that was decided on March 6, 1819.This supreme court case very important in that it was related to how much power the government would have. The federal government used the necessary and proper clause to indicate that it was right and just for them to create a national bank. The state of Maryland imposed a tax 15,000/year on the national bank,which cashier James McCulloch of the Baltimore branch refused to pay. The argument for Maryland was that it was a sovereign state and had the authority to impose a tax any business within its state lines.

    Read More

  • Native American Colonization Pros And Cons

    238 Words  | 1 Pages

    Something that had one of the biggest impacts on the world as it is today is colonization. There’s no way that the world we live in would be the same without it. From colonization, a multitude of good things came out of it, such as wealth for many nations, new land discovered, and colonies established. However, all of those things came at a price to others. The negatives of colonization affected the Native Americans (North, South, and Central America) and the Africans.

    Read More

More about Colonial America Pros And Cons

Open Document