Englishmen and women from centuries ago had very different characteristics and mindsets from both you and I. Being strict believers of God, they ran interesting thought processes in their head that can be very difficult to understand unless one takes the time and effort to learn about the difference between these two time periods and then attempt to think as one who lived 600 years ago. There are two documents being Christopher Columbus’ letter back to the king and queen of England describing the natives and Mary Rowlandson’s story of captivity during King Philip’s war. They will help in learning these two types of mindsets as well as some differences that 200 years can bring. Many factors such as gender and time-frame play a major role in …show more content…
With Columbus’ first description of the “Indians,” he makes it clear that they are a weird society in which they walked around naked and had the females do all the work instead of the males. “...not because they be not a well-formed people and of fair stature, but that they are most wondrously timorous” (Columbus 7). He sees the natives as primitive and could easily be persuaded into the form of Christianity. Ms. Rowlandson begins with this strong mentality as well, presenting claims such as “I should choose rather to be killed by them than taken alive, but when it came to the trial my mind changed” (Rowlandson 73). During King Philip’s war, the town where Rowlandson resided was attacked by the Wampanoag and as she was faced with death, she gave in. She decided that she would rather be taken by the “ravenous beasts” than have her life taken from her showing that the women aren’t as strong as the men …show more content…
The Natives learned how much of a threat the Englishman can be causing two major rebellions to take action. Because of these actions, Englishman grew more hatred and fear toward the Natives causing different opinions to be formed. This can be seen in Rowlandson’s description of captivity showing some fear toward the enemies which had yet to be established when Columbus first encountered the Natives. Alongside the roles of gender causing slight differences in perspective. Though after learning the mentalities and differences between these two timeframes, it should be easier to understand how the mind 600 years ago made
Mary Rowlandson’s A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson has events which reinforce the stereotypical view of Native Americans in colonial times; however, she also has occasions when she encounters behavior contradicting her views. Many white settlers view Native Americans as godless barbarians and Rowlandson highlights that view with her account of the attack and subsequent forced march through the wilderness. The events in the first few days of captivity paint a picture of vicious killers and tormenters of Christians.
His tract depicts how the English viewed all Native Americans as savages, whether Christian or not. This works into Mary Rowlandson account, where she describes Indians as vicious savages and her own capture being punishment from God due to her own lackadaisical Christian worship. Here in lines the great contradictions that plagued the two cultures, it is evident that religion was not what drove the war, it was the differing views by two very different
It is evident that Zinn tries to tear down the reputation of Columbus and his men by calling them thieves. He clearly states that “they had roamed the island in gangs, looking for gold, taking women and children as slaves for sex and labor” (Zinn 2). The author illustrates how Columbus created the natives into adherents whom would give him and his men anything they wanted, whether that be gold, sex, or money. Likewise, Zinn also shows his dislike for Columbus by making him out to be a cold blooded murderer. It is made evident that the author thinks Columbus is a killer when he states “Indians found without a copper token had their hands cut off and bled to death” and any natives that fled from the scene “were hunted down with dogs and killed” (Zinn 3).
Arpita Ray Mr. Lifland AP US History 15 August 2015 Chapter 1: Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress Bias and point of view often impact one’s perspective on history, as it results in the emphasis on some topics, and the avoidance of others to portray one side in better light. The description of Columbus’s treatment of the Indian tribes, his nature, and his wishes support the idea of emphasis on different aspects of history. To prove this thesis, Zinn describes the reality of Columbus’s goals and motivation. In return for his work, he would receive a portion of the profits made in addition to power over the new area and the fame that he would acquire from his expedition. His true motivations, often avoided when discussing this topic,
The colonists lived in a sense of fear that was defined by the idea that the Natives would attack and harm their families or commit crimes like rape. Hostility began to grow from these concerns resulting in attacking the Natives to keep them at bay and act as warning signals to stay away from their communities. However, the Natives actions were more defined by curiosity more so then provoking violence. But, in retaliation, the Natives would strike back as, not only did these settlers take their land but the acts of violence looked to be provocative. This ended in a realization that these Natives would either have to fight for the land they once had or lose it to the colonists that were already beginning to divide the land accordingly to the laws they had placed upon them.
Introduction Christopher Columbus's first letter, written in 1493, is a crucial document that reflects his initial impressions and ideas about the people, land, and resources he encountered on his first voyage to the Americas. In this letter, Columbus represents the natives, the Spanish, and the land in a particular way, which reveals his underlying motivations and intentions. Moreover, Columbus used the topic of "locus amoenus," or a "pleasant place," for political purposes, highlighting the abundance and beauty of the land and its potential for colonization. This essay will analyze Columbus's representation of the natives, the Spanish, and the land in his first letter and examine how he utilized the concept of "locus amoenus" for political purposes. Columbus's Representation of the Natives
Throughout History, women have long struggled and fought for the same equality, justice, and rights as males in society. Historians have two opposing views of what life was like in Puritan society. One side argues that Puritan society was a golden age for women as they worked alongside their husbands, had an important role in the household. However, opposing historians argue that Puritan women were inferior to men in the society for five main reasons. Women were inferior because they were supposed to be silent company, they only received half the inheritance of their brothers, they were meant to have and take care of the children, they received harsher punishment for their wrongs, and they had to follow strict rules.
The Journey from Restrained to Independent The evolution of women’s rights has a unique history of its own. Women’s rights have evolved tremendously throughout many decades. Going back to the colonial times, English women did not have personal rights and they served as maids to their loved ones. Modern women have the freedom that our female ancestors did not have.
The British people treated the Native American’s with cruelty and harshness. An example of this harshness can be seen in the life of Christopher Columbus. Columbus mistakenly discovered the Americas in 1492. Columbus and his crew exploited the Indian tribes by making them search for gold and putting them to death if they did not meet his quota. When the British finally made peace with the Native Americans, the Indian tribes tried to stay as friendly with the Americans/ british as possible.
The narrative offers an account which can be used to describe the particularly puritan society based on the ideals of Christianity and the European culture. It offers a female perspective of the Native Americans who showed no respect to the other religious groups. The narrator makes serious observation about her captors noting the cultural differences as well as expectations from one another in the society. However, prejudice is evident throughout the text which makes the narratives unreliable in their details besides being written after the event had already happened which means that the narrator had was free to alter the events to create an account that favored her. Nonetheless, the narrative remains factually and historically useful in providing the insights into the tactics used by the Native Americans
The Salem witch trials are an outstanding example of a dysfunction in a “perfect” society. Tituba as part of that society helps us understand the simpleness of a complex shaped idea. Notwithstanding that Tituba is considered irrelevant during the Salem trials, nevertheless Tituba exposes European perceptions of Native Americans as a basis for cultural superiority and oppression, since Tituba is an indisputable symbol of injustice, of an ignominious drama, slavery, racism, as well as the defamation of a culture. The decisions that Tituba made throughout her trial, contributed in a substantial magnitude to the American history that’s known nowadays.
English women, on the other hand, were seen as nothing more than caretakers. Concerning property, the English saw this new land as an unclaimed opportunity for economic gain and individual ownership.
The Natives believed that the Europeans are “edgy, rapacious, and remotely maladroit.” Sure enough, the settlers in Jamestown kenned little about farming and found the environment baffling. It was conspicuous that the colonists needed the avail of the Natives. Despite their inexperience the English dominated the Indians. From “the beginning the Virginia Company indited that the relationship would ineluctably become bellicose: for you Cannot Carry Your Selves so towards them but they will Grow Discontented with Your habitation.”
“Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress”, chapter one of “A People’s History of the United States”, written by professor and historian Howard Zinn, concentrates on a different perspective of major events in American history. It begins with the native Bahamian tribe of Arawaks welcoming the Spanish to their shores with gifts and kindness, only then for the reader to be disturbed by a log from Columbus himself – “They willingly traded everything they owned… They would make fine servants… With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.” (Zinn pg.1) In the work, Zinn continues explaining the unnecessary evils Columbus and his men committed unto the unsuspecting natives.
“A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mary Rowlandson”: The Influence of Intercultural Contact on Puritan Beliefs “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson” by Mary Rowlandson gives a first person perspective into the circumstances of captivity and cultural interaction and an insight to Rowlandson 's attitude towards the Indians, both before and after she was held captive. Rowlandson displays a change in her perception of "civilized" and "savage", in spite of the fact that her overall world view does not alter. It should be covered below that in the following Essay, since the author and the narrator are the same person, will not be individually distinguished. For one thing, Mary Rowlandson provides all the conventions typical of a Puritan perspective.