When I first read Come Into Animal Presence by Denise Levertov I was captivated. The poem spoke to me, after I first read it the way I interpreted the poem is a bit different than the way I see it now. When I first read the book I believed that Levertov was trying to show us how innocent and simple animals are, but yet how humans are not. I thought this, for she used words like guileless (innocent, without deception) and insouciant (showing a lack of concern) to describe animals. She talks about how the animals do only what they know to do, the animals do not leave their course because it is the only thing they know. When I first read the poem I believed that Levertov was trying to convey the joy that we get by seeing these animals, act without a care of what is happening around them. I know see the poem as a lesson trying to teach us to take life simpler. She does this by relating humans to animals …show more content…
She is able to send a message when she calls the snake guileless. She is saying that she believes that a person should be straightforward with others and with oneself. Levertov believes that a person should not be trying to hide anything or be too concerned about what one does. People should not be too concerned about what has happened you can 't change that past, but in the same sense worrying about the future is not going to help, it will hold you back when you want to make bold decisions for you will be worried about the consequences. In the first stanza levertov also calls an armadillo insouciant. The armadillo see’s no fear in the people it comes across as it is walking on its path, it simply keeps walking into the brush. This is showing that the armadillo does what his instincts tell him to do and he is not scared or pushed off his path by others who are trying to distract him.. With the armadillo Levertov is trying teach us not to get intimidated by
As a result of the comparison of likeness of humans and animals, the audience is compelled to sympathize with the animals, augmenting the persuasiveness of the author's
Have you ever been hunted or wondered what it would be like to be hunted, well Richard Connell the author of The Most Dangerous Game has exercised this idea into a short story. Rainsfords external conflict with zaroff, and his view on animals and how they change throughout the story, and being hunted by zaroff, then the change of his view on animals reveal that humans are more like animals than we realize. Throughout the story Rainsford’s understanding about how animals feel changes. Rainsford’s initial of view animals is that they do not feel anything and that they only know how to survive.
Line 5 and 6 describe a “mouse which once hath broken out of trap / Is seldom 'ticed with the trustless bait”, here the mouse has “learned the hard way” on grabbing foods that seem too good to be true. The same goes for the speaker; he is not enticed by the bait –love– because he has previously fallen into a trap –heartbreak. Bait is not a word normally used to describe humans; therefore, the author breaks from social norms and compares humans to bait in order to better describe his emotions through analogy. Another instance of animal imagery occurred in line 9 and 10. The author says that a “scorched fly which once hath 'scaped the flame / Will hardly come to play again with fire”, this time, instead of a mouse, the author compares his reasoning for not looking at a particular woman to a fly.
He states in this poem that those things make up who we are, and that these things are too difficult to let go for a fate that we don't know and scientists can't prove. It would be easier to stay behind and stick to the habits that keep us happy rether than accepting our own deaths and having to take on our own sadness. Lingering around as yourself would even be preferred to inhabiting an animal or object and living a lifetime as that. The poem opens with a Middle Ages' lore of having to block the holes of objects and sht the mouths of animals when someone dies so that person won't inhabit that object or creature, but immediately
The use of imagery invokes a sense of discomfort and disgust in the speaker. In “Plums Failing Well”, the only attention they receive is from “ants and birds”. This indicates that humans have absolutely zero respect towards the plums. In fact, the only attention they receive is from the lower class creatures such as “ants”. By using personification, if “only they can breath”, the poet is comparing plums to humans.
Whether it be a movement, an essay, or a novel, motifs in literature and in life are significant and deserve deep investigation. Due to a motif’s ability to reinforce themes through symbolization, imagery and recursion, it is a common sight in today’s most famous works. A prevalent motif in American literature and movements, is that of the animal. Two exceptional examples of pieces that use animal motifs successfully are, Their Eyes Were Watching God, by Zora Neale Hurston and The Yippie Manifesto, by Jerry Rubin. In both of these compositions, animals appear as meaningful motifs, in order to bolster a scene or movement’s emotional weight and significance, and to provide the audience with connections to the outside world.
The following poems all teach readers the importance and significance of wildlife and the horrible treatment they too often receive from human beings. As everything becomes more modern, we can not help but stray farther away from nature. This increasingly insensitive attitude can have detrimental effects on the environment. Although the elements of poetry used in the following poems vary, Gail White’s “Dead Armadillos,” Walt McDonald’s “Coming Across It,” and Alden Nowlan’s “The Bull Moose,” all share one major conflict; our civilization 's problematic relationship to the wild.
Similes in the poem such as ‘till he was like to drop’ are used to create a more descriptive image in the reader’s mind. Metaphors when saying ‘He lifted up his hairy paw’ and in many other sections of the poem to exaggerate areas to give the reader a more interesting view. So the poet can express what he is trying to prove through and entertaining way. The imagery device enhances the poem to make it stand out more so it grabs the reader attention. The poem was a very entertaining and humorous.
Through the poem’s tone, metaphors used, and symbols expressed the poem portrays that fear can make life seem charred or obsolete, but in reality life propels through all seasons and obstacles it faces. The poem begins with a tone of conversation, but as it progresses the tone changes to a form of fear and secretiveness. The beginning and ending line “we tell
The poem “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kuman and the poem “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop give the reader two examples about how man interacts with nature. Charles Darwin wrote “the love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man”; it is clear that the narrator of one of the poems is much more noble than that of the narrator in the other poem. Not only do the narrators contrast each other in the two poems, the poems also differ in the theme, tone, and situation (Citr). The theme of the poem “Woodchucks” is no regard for the life of living creatures and death.
I have interpreted these lines in one way, yet there are a million different possibilities. The author puts the words onto the paper, but the reader’s job is to interpret their own emotion, memory or belief and actually apply it to the poet’s words in order to create an
Within the first 10 lines of the poem, Bryant personifies nature. He makes you feel as if nature is the most loving and comforting person. “She has a voice of gladness, and a smile And eloquence of beauty, and she glides Into his darker musings, with a mild And healing sympathy, that steals away Their sharpness, ere he is aware.” (Line 4-8)
While reading this poem you can see "...where the Indian in a white poncho lies dead by the side of the road" and you can see how sad that scene is. This image is a striking image because it grabs the readers attention as to how bad someone's life could be and what Linley someone could be filled with. Another striking image that grabs the readers attention and makes them thing is when the reader pictures "how you ride and ride/ thinking the bus will never stop,/ the passengers eating maize and chicken/ will stare out the window forever. " This image strikes the reader because it makes them look into the passengers lonely hopeless faces. The imagery in this poem makes the reader think about their life and what sadness and sorrow is really like and how kindness can change someone's life all around.
Both people and animals walk on the streets and either could step on or touch something sharp and cut themselves. Animals could also eat trash and, depending on what it is, it could cause harm to them or potentially kill them. “As I turn up the collar on my favourite winter coat” (stanza 2, line 1), while not being a direct piece of figurative language, means that he has choices between which coat he wears. He is more privileged than others, which is a reason to help others. Also, more figuratively, turning up the collar on your coat can mean that you are shutting people out and only thinking about yourself.
There are several interpretations of John Keats’ poem, Ode to a Nightingale. Keats begins his poem with talking about a bird that seems real, but as the poem progresses the bird turns into a symbol. Keats was envisioning how life could be much simpler and he was thinking about the different ways life is troublesome. His reality was taken over by his dream of having a life like the nightingale- worryless and free. He wishes that he could join the bird because if he could escape to the nightingale’s world, he could escape from reality and live a much more uncomplicated and worry free life.