Comfort Women Memorial Statues: it is possible for these to be symbols of peace? 1. Introduction This term paper focuses on the symbolic meaning of comfort women Memorial Statues around the world. Are these, or can these statues be someday, symbols of peace? To give answer to this question concerning the ongoing disputes and conflicts between Japan and other nations, I will hereinafter draw, for comparison with the comfort women case, the case of the Hiroshima A-bomb Cenotaph, which has been taken up in the June 20 lecture, and the case of the Nazi Holocaust memorials. 2. The purpose of war memorials A memorial monument in general is defined as “a general term of building which is publicly established in order that a particular person or …show more content…
The case of the comfort women statues Comfort women Statues are a family of statues settled across the world commemorating the comfort women, who are believed to be coerced by the Imperial Japanese Army to engage in the sexual service for the troops. A recent case is Glendale, California, the case that made a wide dispute over the Internet society. What is to be noted is that almost all of the epitaphs of statues contain two types of tokens: “peace” and “Japan Army”. For example, the epitaph of the Glendale statue reads as follows: Peace Monument In memory of more than 200,000 Asian and Dutch women who were removed from their homes in Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, East Timor and Indonesia, to be coerced into sexual slavery by the Imperial Armed Forces of Japan between 1932 and 1945. And in celebration of proclamation of “Comfort Women Day”by the City of Glendale on July 30, 2012, and of passing of House Resolution 121 by the United States Congress on July 30, 2007, urging the Japanese Government to accept historical responsibility for these crimes. It is our sincere hope that these unconscionable violations of human rights shall never recur. July 30, 2013 (Reprinted from Wikipedia, underlined by …show more content…
Conclusion As seen above, the Comfort Women statues have still a long way to go to become symbols of peace in spite of their self-reference as “peace” symbols. However, it is still possible, I believe, for them to be. Compared to the Hiroshima Cenotaph, the Comfort Women statues do not lack the universal evaluation in terms of the urgency for humanity (c). However, the problem of (b), namely the problem of forgiveness, has not yet been over. Since the post war clean up has not been completely done, as we saw in Section 4, even ordinary Japanese tend to refuse to admit the responsibility in fear of the infinite blame being put upon eternally (for the detailed mechanism see Takahashi 2001: 1-20) and the Korean people are still unwilling to extinguish their anger. The victims that have still not been satisfied with the compensation from Japan are whom we should sympathize with. It is also understandable that the Korean activists are furious with the way the Japanese Government has undertook the responsibility. However, without concrete recognition and broad agreement on women’s right shared by both Japan and other countries, and the overcoming with the tu quoque problem, the settlement will ended up in making the matter
When learning about and analyzing acts of mass atrocity during World War II, hundreds if not thousands of questions can be asked trying to gain a deeper understanding for their actions. Probably one of the most intriguing thoughts to ponder is what leads individuals and societies as a whole to descend to such a level of cruelty. According to the author of Unbroken, Laura Hillenbrand, one reason may be, “Few societies treasured dignity, and feared humiliation, as did the Japanese, for whom a loss of honor could merit suicide. This is likely one of the reasons why Japanese soldiers in World War II debased their prisoners with such zeal, seeking to take from them that which was most painful and destructive to lose” (189). To elaborate, the Japanese
Order No. 9066, 7 C.F.R. 1407 (1942). Retrieved from http://www.vlib.us/amdocs/texts/fdrrelocation1942.html Shaffer, R. (1999). Opposition to internment: Defending Japanese American rights during World War II. The Historian, 61(3), 597–619. Trowbridge, D. J. (2016).
Although Fussell admits that the bomb was a “most cruel ending to that most cruel war”, and that those who claim that the use of the atom bomb was wrong are simply attempting to “resolve ambiguity” concerning the ethics of war, he believes that the bomb was, without doubt, necessary. Using mainly statistics and accounts of soldiers, Fussell introduces several compelling figures. First, he reveals that for the anticipated Allied invasion of Japan, “one million American casualties was the expected price“. Secondly, Fussell tells us that “Universal national kamikaze was the point” which means that every man, woman, and child in Japan would have been prepared to sacrifice their life in defense of the homeland. If this suicidal loyalty is taken into consideration, it seems that the loss of Japanese life upon the invasion of the mainland would have far outweighed the actual loss of life that occurred when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed.
Monuments that are constructed in order to give commendation to people, places, or events are located all over the globe. It is very possible for someone to find a few in their very own town. Although there may be negative controversy on certain monuments, many throughout the world have changed individual’s lives tremendously in a beneficial way. One monument in particular has stood tall through it all and has had so much positive effect on millions of people from the beginning of time. One hundred and thirty years later this monument continues to impact people’s lives from all over the world.
Julie Otsuka’s When the Emperor was Divine is a story about a Japanese-American family and their experience in an internment camp in Utah. In the book, the young girl says to her mother “Is there anything wrong with my face?... People were staring” (15). The reader can see from this quote what it was like for the Japanese-Americans during the war. The quote shows how it was not just a national problem; it was a problem for everyone- including making a ten year old girl feel self-conscious.
These memorials have the same overwhelming feeling of respect and gratitude for the men and women who gave their lives for the life we have today. Based on this information, I
During the World War II, Japan committed, considerably, some of the worst acts of cruelty ever recorded in history. The influence left on Prisoner of War guards,
Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.
If you had a statue in your town, Why would you want a statue representing your town that isn’t a hero? The text states, “Instead of honoring the officers, it honored the killers. That kind of “honor” has no place in an American city.” What do you think? From the other side, this statue and other statues are memories to some.
Kirk Savage suggests in Source A (Savage), “The public monument speaks to a deep need for attachment that can be met only in a real place, where
Japanese Relocation The relocation and internment of the Japanese in America is often seen as one of our nation's greatest mistakes. For many, the quest is to now understand why we committed such an atrocious act. The most common explanations include racist attitudes, military ‘necessity’, and economic reasons. Japanese relocation was a disgracefully racist act that the Government of the U.S committed, an act that was virtually unnecessary and unjustified.
Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and
The Yasukuni Controversy “What atrocious controversy could possibly lie in a shrine?” one would think to themselves as they walk under an enormous and welcoming torii. The Yasukuni Shrine is certainly infamous, which is hard to believe when it is adorned with such lavish flowers and promises it’s visitors that it was “established to honour the courageous soldiers who laid a foundation for modern Japan, and to pray for the repair of their souls”. With such supposedly pure intentions, it only seems natural for the prime minister of Japan to pray at this shrine. Yet, after feeling an eerie gaze from the right-winged propaganda vehicles that were slowly patrolling around the shrine and seeing just a little too many Japanese flags, things started
One must keep in mind that, monuments may never make everyone happy. As long as a monument was not made with the intention of attacking a group of people it deserves to be
Thesis statement: Though many speculate that the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) while not doing so on Europe (Germany and Italy) was racially motivated, racism played little to no role in these bombings. The United States of America and her allies were willing to end World War II at any cost, had the atomic bombs been available they would have been deployed in Europe. In the 1940’s there is no doubt that the United States of America was engulfed by mass anti-Japanese hysteria which inevitably bled over into America’s foreign policy. During this period Japanese people living in both Japan and the United States of America were seen as less that human.