According to Jamie Fuller, Common Core might be the most important issue in the 2016 Republican Presidential election (Strauss). Some of the issues include a concern about "...a race towards the mediocre middle"(Strauss). The costs involving Common Core such as new tests, books, and technology would be included in the cost of Common Core. Thomas B. Fordham described the proposed standards as being "very, very strong"(Associated Press). Understanding Common Core is understanding that Common Core is standardized teaching, testing, and high student performance.
The Common Core State standards were released in 2010, and it was a good time for them to be released. These standards gave the presidential candidates just enough time to choose whether
…show more content…
It is believed that the curriculum is too complex for states that were originally too far behind when really educational success depends on the dedication of teachers, the motivation of students, and the support of parents (Farmer) With the curriculum being similar for everyone some of the people who went into the advanced math classes saw huge growth, expecting to only get better each year (Paulson). The kid’s critical thinking skills are improved with common core (Paulson) (Layton) The new math standards require you to know how to do a problem multiple ways. It focuses more on critical thinking skills rather than memorizing a formula. The new standards could leave the kids in the higher grades behind. The kids coming into kindergarten will be able to learn from the common core standards from the get go giving that generation an academic advantage. Eventually once everyone who is in school has started common core from the get go you will see its perks. The word standardized is defined by (dictionary definition) There are many more standardizations but the ones I addressed were necessary in proving that being pro common core is the way to go (Farmer). With an understanding of common core it is apparent that common core will be beneficial to the …show more content…
The Common Core does have a lot of support from the Obama administration. The Core does not prescribe how the students should meet the standards (Strauss). Each state that adopts Common Core also receives federal funding. The states needed this; otherwise, they would have trouble paying for everything that is needed in the change from the state standards to the Common Core state standards. The states that applied for waivers from No Child Left Behind were asked to adopt the common standards by the Education Department. Duncan promised that the new Core-aligned exams would be an “absolute game-changer in public information” (Strauss). The test that were scheduled for the next school year didn’t get the high amount of approval from the supporters. They were hoping for more of a leap forward. All in all the Common Core tests will be more advanced than the current assessments (Strauss). The education standards are intended for kindergartners through 12th graders about what they ought to be able to know and do at each grade level (Simon) It is meant to get every student in the country United States of America on the same page (Simon). A lot of countries with good educational systems have something like the Common Core in
Even with all the cons associated with the Common Core Standards, I think the new Common
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards.
What was revealed by analysis showing a progression through time with CCSS? Both America’s political left and right vigorously tout their solution is the only one and education is a hotbed because it is an easy target. Evidence: Activists and politicos try and harness the debate from any angle that would put their point of view ahead of their rival. Common Core in the mainstream right media is portrayed as an evil creation by the left. Generally it has nothing to do with the standards themselves, but is likely to be any additional hot point that can be born under the name Common Core (Simon).
Sawchuk, S. (2012). Many Teachers Not Ready for the Common Core. Education Digest, 16-22. http://proxy.ashland.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=82981829&site=ehost-live Beginning this research I stumbled on this article which discusses the successful implementation of the Common Core Standards.
In 2009, governors and state commissioners alike came together to formulate the development and implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Through membership organizations such as the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) (http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/), they were able to create a system that represented a clear-cut caliber of expectations meant for students in kindergarten to grade 12. Over the past several years, new amendments have been added to keep up with the standard that 48 states have adopted into their school systems, although the adoption of the policy was voluntary (http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/). Despite majority of the states in the U.S. having decided on the policy already, there has been conflict amongst the parents of the children who are subject to the rigorous and exhausting amount of tests they must take to keep up with what is fixed into their school systems. The argument against test-taking is a controversy in itself as many believe
Our current period in education is full of great change and opportunity. Students, teachers, and principals are being challenged to think, learn, and apply in different ways. The Common Core State Standards and technology are the main reasons this time period is so important. These two things are creating, "great opportunities within themselves" (Fullan, p.12, 2014) and at the same time are very challenging because they have "unclear implications for implementation" (Fullan, p.12, 2014). Both Common Core State Standards and technology are very complex and create an exciting time in learning across the educational system however, make it challenging for educators in the U.S. to be effective and implement in a way that maximizes learning.
It was discovered that in education there were certain areas that were universal and common among learning. The two main subjects of concern were English language arts and mathematics. Common core is the new curriculum implemented now in school systems to develop learning. Common Core Standards are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for the knowledge and skills students need in English language arts and mathematics at each grade level so they can be prepared to succeed in college, career, and life. Although, Common Core seems to be here to stay this article addresses concerns in reference to content, instruction, and assessment.
“When the Common Core first caught public attention in early 2010, it seemed like an unstoppable locomotive… As I write in the summer of 2014, the prospect is a bit different. That locomotive is nowhere to be seen and may be lying on its side in a dry gulch”(Wood 29). Common Core started off strong however, after uncovering all of the problems that lie within it, it has become more of a problem than a
I say this because it just adds more unnecessary stress on the students, it also works at a speed that might either be too slow or fast for you. In 2009 the states decided that they wanted to share a learning system, they called this system Common Core. The amount of people still using Common Core consists of 42 states, 4 territories, and the District of Columbia. One of the problems I see with Common Core is standardized
Common Core; an education system hated by students, teachers and parents. Far too many standards projects have simply become efforts to move decisions about teaching and learning away from educators, to be put in the hands of politicians and bureaucracies. Common core was developed in 2009 and its curriculum has been adopted by 45 states. Currently, 34 states have introduced Anti-Common Core legislation, 16 have withdrawn or are in the process of withdrawing, and 27 have introduced legislation that and the use of PARCC and SBAC assessments. It is filled with fake promises, harsh politics, and failure for the future generation.
Many people say that the Common standards are not culturally equitable, and that it has harmed student’s love of literature and progress in math. Parents also feel it has taken away their say in their child’s education. The standards were developed behind
While Common core provides a standard for all states to achieve the same level of academic excellence, Implementing new academic standards for all students to comprehend does not fix the academic achievements of Virginia or of the United States, because it doesn't implement any solutions to help students achieve higher standards, and fails to provide a better method to teach the curriculum to the students. The daunting tone of the voices throughout the nation is raising apprehensions about the imposed Common Core State Standards (CCSS). If you pay attention clearly to the discussions, the vital concern is not solely in regards to the standards, but also towards the effects of the bemused tests ascribed to these standards. The standards have become foremost associated with the testing facet, rather than the deeper learning they were intended to promote.
According to the Kentucky Department of Education test scores in all three Common Core subjects have gone up. In english test scores have gone up 3.7%, in math test scores have gone up 4.8%, and in reading there is an increase of just over 5.2%. This evidence shows that not only are students improving, they are improving in all three Common Core subjects. On the other hand, some may say that Common Core is based on a very average curriculum, but it’s only logical to say that if average curriculum is improving our below average education then what’s the problem? All in all Common Core is a good solution for America’s education system.
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40