Common Core In America Pros And Cons

1552 Words7 Pages

According to Jamie Fuller, Common Core might be the most important issue in the 2016 Republican Presidential election (Strauss). Some of the issues include a concern about "...a race towards the mediocre middle"(Strauss). The costs involving Common Core such as new tests, books, and technology would be included in the cost of Common Core. Thomas B. Fordham described the proposed standards as being "very, very strong"(Associated Press). Understanding Common Core is understanding that Common Core is standardized teaching, testing, and high student performance.
The Common Core State standards were released in 2010, and it was a good time for them to be released. These standards gave the presidential candidates just enough time to choose whether …show more content…

It is believed that the curriculum is too complex for states that were originally too far behind when really educational success depends on the dedication of teachers, the motivation of students, and the support of parents (Farmer) With the curriculum being similar for everyone some of the people who went into the advanced math classes saw huge growth, expecting to only get better each year (Paulson). The kid’s critical thinking skills are improved with common core (Paulson) (Layton) The new math standards require you to know how to do a problem multiple ways. It focuses more on critical thinking skills rather than memorizing a formula. The new standards could leave the kids in the higher grades behind. The kids coming into kindergarten will be able to learn from the common core standards from the get go giving that generation an academic advantage. Eventually once everyone who is in school has started common core from the get go you will see its perks. The word standardized is defined by (dictionary definition) There are many more standardizations but the ones I addressed were necessary in proving that being pro common core is the way to go (Farmer). With an understanding of common core it is apparent that common core will be beneficial to the …show more content…

The Common Core does have a lot of support from the Obama administration. The Core does not prescribe how the students should meet the standards (Strauss). Each state that adopts Common Core also receives federal funding. The states needed this; otherwise, they would have trouble paying for everything that is needed in the change from the state standards to the Common Core state standards. The states that applied for waivers from No Child Left Behind were asked to adopt the common standards by the Education Department. Duncan promised that the new Core-aligned exams would be an “absolute game-changer in public information” (Strauss). The test that were scheduled for the next school year didn’t get the high amount of approval from the supporters. They were hoping for more of a leap forward. All in all the Common Core tests will be more advanced than the current assessments (Strauss). The education standards are intended for kindergartners through 12th graders about what they ought to be able to know and do at each grade level (Simon) It is meant to get every student in the country United States of America on the same page (Simon). A lot of countries with good educational systems have something like the Common Core in

Open Document