Common Core is the new standard of teaching in schools implemented by the federal government. State education chiefs and governors developed a set of standards that they believe students should know after each grade, so they are prepared for college or a job after high school. But are these standards fair for everyone? Not everyone learns at the same speed and some students require special attention. The cost of Common Core is also costly to the school districts. Most teachers do not support Common Core either. I believe there needs to be some modifications made for student with special needs.
Common Core is tailored to a student that learns at a normal rate. The creators did not take into consideration students with mental and physical
…show more content…
The cost of Common Core can greatly impact a school and a student`s education. The Washington State Office of Public Instruction last year estimated the new Common Core standards will cost taxpayers in the state more than $300 million. (Kittle, M.D.). These costs are due to the new need for technology, textbooks, and other requirements for Common Core. Since Common Core tests are mainly computer operated, schools now need the technology in order to complete them. This money could be used somewhere else such as art or music programs. Many school are eliminating art programs because of the lack of money. Money can also be used to hire more teachers, so class sizes can be decreased in …show more content…
Each student is different and learns differently. There needs to be modifications for special needs students. The price tag of common core is hurting school districts. The anxiety of test taking is causing psychological effects on some students. The communication between parents and children regarding school work is just about lost and teachers now teach towards the test. I honestly do not think that common core will drastically help a student be better prepared for college or a job after high school. Since it is still a new concept, there is no real statistical data to support how effective common core is. You should not have to worry about how good you do on a test, but rather develop critical thinking skills do better yourself for the
“The law's annual testing requirements in math and reading have led many schools to pump up the amount of time they spend teaching these two staples — often at the expense of other subjects, such as history, art or science.” (Blass, 2007) Another problem is that the assessment doesn’t take individual learning into account. There is no correction for a learning disability in a student, or for students in Special Ed. Rob Andrews put it best by saying, “A school's AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) should not be based on standardized tests that fail to account for a child's cognitive capacity… in many cases [the standardized test] is beyond the abilities of special education students.”
Even with all the cons associated with the Common Core Standards, I think the new Common
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards.
Explanation: This important because the backers of CCSS believe if that the general public could understand exactly what the standards are, there might be more support for them. Only seventeen percent of Americans who supported Common Core and the remainder was either confused or thought it was an umbrella for many topics other than education (Simon) This all connects back to my argument that the debate has spun out of control fueled by both sides, with the public stuck in the middle trying to grasp some understanding of CCSS. Analysis to compare of what is driving the resistance Politics, money, power
Students leave school stressed and full of anxiety and its actually making a negative effect on their everyday life. Students get so overwhelmed that harming themselves is in the picture. The state needs to realize that students aren’t giving their 100% and they will never know their actual academic skills. So why give standardized test? Teachers need to focus on the future and teaching them skills they need in their everyday life.
One of the biggest myths about the Common Core State Standards is that states will no longer have control of education in their respective states.
Common Core Mathematic Standards have been under evaluation because of a debate between college professors, some who feel the standards are not substantial enough to prepare students for the college degree. It is a teacher’s responsibility to prepare their students for the next level. Even many supporters believe that the Common Core State Standards have many flaws and should be evaluated. With that being stated, the board that constructed the standards made mention that the cause for these flaws is because they focused so much on the K-8 standards that they ran out of time. Because of this short time, they ended up having to rush to work sure the K-8 plus or High School Standards were completed, meaning they had less time to truly think them through.
(About the Standards, n.d.). Lets start with who designed the common core? Common Core State Standards Initiative said, “states across the country collaborated with teachers, researchers, and leading experts to design
As written in the tenth amendment, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” The mission for the department of education has always been “ to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access”(“Federal Role in Education”). This means while each school strives to not only create a competitive education environmental but also to separate the individual students needs from the whole as an individual not a group. Common Core started with a single state in 2009 however the organization can trace its origins started back to 2007. (Common core standards.org.) According to “Common Core Standards” “ Common core is not a curriculum.
What if a certain community cannot invest in a better education? What if education is now becoming too expensive and children are now not receiving adequate information to mold a better future for themselves? This is where Common Core creates a great dilemma in the United States of America. Common Core was created in 2009 that lists a set of standards for the grades K-12 that was created to better prepare students for the future in college and their careers. It has already been nine years in which this has been active, but schools are still barely transitioning due to the fact that these standards are very difficult to understand.
Standardized tests are not helping the students of the United States of America and they should remove the mandatory tests students are forced to take. Throughout one’s education in the United States of America, a student is going to run into many standardized tests. This is the result of the signing of the No Child Left Behind Act that was signed by President George W. Bush in 2002. It was signed to give more responsibility to the government to educate the children of the United States of America. Underneath all the legal words, it meant that states must test students, from the third grade to the twelfth grade.
In fact 70 percent of educators surveyed in 2015 say that tests are not developmentally appropriate. Furthermore many students suffer a great deal of stress because of standardized tests. What’s most shocking is that instead of lower income schools getting better after tests were implemented they have actually gotten worse. School could essentially be taught by robots. At this point most teachers in my district have to teach a curriculum that is developed by the state instead of their own curriculum.
The United States adaptation of the Common Core mathematics standards has reduced the competitiveness of American schools compared to other nations. In 2009 the Common Core State Standards Initiative developed new state curriculum standards for implementation across the country. The intention of these standards was not only to unify curriculums across the states, but to implement a greater focus for mathematics than previous
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40