While Common core provides a standard for all states to achieve the same level of academic excellence, Implementing new academic standards for all students to comprehend does not fix the academic achievements of Virginia or of the United States, because it doesn't implement any solutions to help students achieve higher standards, and fails to provide a better method to teach the curriculum to the students.
The daunting tone of the voices throughout the nation is raising apprehensions about the imposed Common Core State Standards (CCSS). If you pay attention clearly to the discussions, the vital concern is not solely in regards to the standards, but also towards the effects of the bemused tests ascribed to these standards. The standards have become foremost associated with the testing facet, rather than the deeper learning they were intended to promote. The CCSS initiative focuses exclusively on English language arts and mathematics skills evaluated primarily with multiple-choice tests. The multiple choice style of the end of year test taking advocated by the CCSS, while making the grading process
…show more content…
While imperfect as it is, the CCSS initiative “focuses on developing the critical-thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills students will need to be successful” (What parents should know, 2010, para. 2). Actual learning takes place when our students are motivated in the pursuit for knowledge and are prompted to understand a multifaceted problem and formulate a solution for it. Learning is a diverse process that does not defer easily to a subjective metric. The main questions that should be asked are whether the minds of our students are being challenged and are they vigorously engaged trying to work through their problems? Instead of making them memorize facts, the CCSS aspires to teach our students to
Today there is a huge debate between Common Core Standards and the Alabama College and Career Readiness Standards. These two standards are highly debated and investigated amongst teachers, government officials, and parents to understand which standards will enhance student’s academic knowledge. Some state political boards do not agree with the new adoption if the Common Core Standards. After researching both standards and gaining my own opinion, I think to adopt the new Common Core Standards is a positive thing for our school systems. Even though it has some negative like difficult transition for students, standards are vague, and unequal access to technology in the classroom and at home (Meador, 2017).
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
Explanation: This important because the backers of CCSS believe if that the general public could understand exactly what the standards are, there might be more support for them. Only seventeen percent of Americans who supported Common Core and the remainder was either confused or thought it was an umbrella for many topics other than education (Simon) This all connects back to my argument that the debate has spun out of control fueled by both sides, with the public stuck in the middle trying to grasp some understanding of CCSS. Analysis to compare of what is driving the resistance Politics, money, power
Sawchuk discusses the massive task of getting all the public school K-12 teachers ready for the standards. Professional development and the roles of the states and school districts are reviewed. This article is clearly demonstrates the amount of work it will involve to make the Common Core Standards a reality across the United States. Wilhoit, G. (2012). Make-or-break state action.
Our current period in education is full of great change and opportunity. Students, teachers, and principals are being challenged to think, learn, and apply in different ways. The Common Core State Standards and technology are the main reasons this time period is so important. These two things are creating, "great opportunities within themselves" (Fullan, p.12, 2014) and at the same time are very challenging because they have "unclear implications for implementation" (Fullan, p.12, 2014). Both Common Core State Standards and technology are very complex and create an exciting time in learning across the educational system however, make it challenging for educators in the U.S. to be effective and implement in a way that maximizes learning.
It was discovered that in education there were certain areas that were universal and common among learning. The two main subjects of concern were English language arts and mathematics. Common core is the new curriculum implemented now in school systems to develop learning. Common Core Standards are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for the knowledge and skills students need in English language arts and mathematics at each grade level so they can be prepared to succeed in college, career, and life. Although, Common Core seems to be here to stay this article addresses concerns in reference to content, instruction, and assessment.
Nevertheless, schools are facing hard times and taking the loss right where it hurts, the pocketbook. Many states signed up for the new curriculum within only two months, which was not nearly long enough to make sure that the new learning standard was fit for them. By signing up, these states agreed to buy tests and upgrade their technology to administer the tests. All of this added up to thirty dollars per student, more than what half the states can afford. “Common Core Causes Collateral Damage” reveals, “Just last month, Maryland announced it would need $100 million to get schools up to speed to administer the tests”(McShane, 2).
Sanders offers a new perspective of angle on the concept of learning. When thinking of learning, most jump to memorization or intelligence, but Sanders argues that is not actually learning. He views learning as improving one’s self-image and comprehension so that they can use those skills in the future. He also offers a new perspective on the questions to ask about a college education. One shouldn’t ask how can I get my degree, but rather how they can get the most out of their degree.
The Common Core State Standards (2010) for writing in fourth grade address text types and purposes, production and distribution of writing, research to build and present knowledge, and range of writing. Students are expected to write arguments, informative/explanatory texts and narratives; develop and strengthen writing using technology to produce and enhance writing; engage in reading and writing from sources; and write routinely over different time frames. In the text message and translation activity the teacher’s goal was to help students produce clear and coherent writing while including the important components of effective writing such as setting a purpose for writing, allowing choices in how and what to write, and addressing audience
Research Topic At High School One (a pseudonym) a rural 2A high school in Central Washington State, students struggle with the rigorous reading and writing skills necessitated by the Common Core State Standards. The Common Core State Standards require students to use skills and strategies that include: making assessments, comparing and contrasting the same topic in several sources, integrating quantitative or technical analysis, determining central ideas and providing accurate summaries (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010). As Washington State has adopted the rigorous standards of the Common Core and the Smarter Balanced standardized test, the traditional teaching and testing
After watching both videos, “The English Language Arts Standards: Key Changes and their Evidence” and “The Mathematics Standards: Key Changes and their Evidence,” I now realized where the need for the Common Core standards arise from, with the United States being behind in education ranking at 14th and our students performing at a low standard. The Common Core standards were formed to help combat this situation. Our students were entering college and the workforce under prepared. The Common Core standards were implemented with the understanding that these standards would help our students to graduate high school, college and career ready. These standards will provide a better understanding and mastering skills in language arts and mathematics.
In the state of Oklahoma all the parents, teachers and students disliked the CCSS. So in June of 2010 the battle to dismantle the common core state standards began. But a lot did protest the adoption of the new CCSS for the school year 2014-15. One of the former superintendent of public instruction of the State of Oklahoma Linda Murphy. Murphy said “Oklahoman’s need to put a stop to the Common Core State Standards before it does further damage to our children’s education.”
The California Common Core Standard I chose was Reading Standards for Foundational Skills K-5 on pages 17 and 18. I specifically chose first grade students. This grade level is appropriate for my teaching area when I begin to student teach and for the classroom I currently work in. First grade students should be able to identify the key components of a sentence (the first word, capitialization and ending punctuation) on a piece of paper. Phonological awareness is important for students to learn early on.
Common Core also shows that students that are coming out of this curriculum are more prepared to enter college by using their critical thinking
Introduction Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. Thesis Statement Standardized tests should not be eliminated completely, but should rather be evaluated in addition to other factors such as grades, extracurricular activities, and volunteer hours. This would take pressure off of students during standardized tests, allow colleges to see how well-rounded the students are, and give students who are better in other areas