I agree with all of the strengths of an INTP. This is because I can either see them in myself or others think I have them. (As shown by the poll we took in class.) I feel I display all the strengths of an INTP. Great analysing, abstract thinking, imagination and originality can all be shown through just a few of the conversations I have with Brendon Mondino.
It is an innate understanding, the principles of which are not debatable. As a result one must be aware of and begin with those first principles. Scientific knowledge is like the virtue of intellect in that what is scientifically known cannot be otherwise. Scientific knowledge is the universal truths in a given field that cannot be otherwise and can be demonstrated rationally. Art is within the class of what can be otherwise and is concerned with coming into being.
The majority of our nonverbal practices or the motions we make, the way we sit, how quick or how boisterous we talk, how close we stand, the amount of eye contact we make send solid messages. These messages don't stop when you quit talking either. Notwithstanding when you're noiseless, regardless, you're conveying non-verbally. As a rule, what leaves our mouths and what we convey through our non-verbal communication
Objectivity refers to a commitment to truthfulness which is to “report factually accurate information”. It is also to “imply neutrality in a sense of fairness” which is to be “unbiased to a report in an event and to present different viewpoints even-handedly.” (Calcutt and Hammond
Cheat Sheet “Common sense is the most widely shared commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it.” René Descartes *** Common sense is an important attribute to have wherever you are in the world. Much of what you need to know and remember while in Thailand or anywhere is common sense. For some reason though, common sense is one of the first things men forget when they come to Thailand. The words of wisdom in this chapter can be applied just anywhere in the world.
Frege and Geach on Assertion In this paper I will analyse Frege’s view on Assertion (as discussed in his papers “Sense and Reference” and “Thought”) followed by an account of Geach’s defence of this idea. Frege holds relevance in the history of analytical philosophy for proposing a sense to bridge the gap between what is said and what is heard and thus educating us about what is ‘expressed’. But among his rather rigid theory about how language works, he also advances an even more obscure theory about how assertion works. On Frege’s account, an assertion is any thought acknowledged as a judgement.
The sense presented in an object is greatly autonomous to the identity of the object in question. The understanding that different signs may be used to designate the very same object is important in attaining more knowledge about it. It implies that more knowledge can be devoted to understanding one particular object in a more diversified
1. Grantwriters have clearly defined needs along with describing how those needs were identified and how they will be resolved. 2. Grantwriters give something back. They are not selfish with there their request and show the benefits for others.
“The science of attention teaches us that we tend to pay attention to what we have been taught to value and that we tend to be astonishingly blind to change until something disrupts our pattern and makes us see what has been invisible before.” Page 243 Common sense to dictate that people will acknowledge problems before it occurs. You would think that people will be able to understand the outcome before it happens but that is not true. In part four of Cathy Davidson’s, “Now You See it”, she emphasize the importance of working with other people to help us to see what we are missing. In discussion of attention blindness, it is very difficult for a person alone to develop ingenious idea of solution to a problem because that person may only see the scope of a bigger picture.