Zen Buddhism can be fairly confusing to the average person; the teachings and stories may come across as arbitrary or nonsensical. However, do not let that deter you from getting to experience a religion that offers a highly different perspective of the world. The focus will be on analyzing some of the common themes of Zen Buddhism that comprises the Zen Slogan (associated with the First Patriarch). The phrase is: “a special transmission outside of the teachings not established upon words and letters; it directly points to the human mind and seeing one’s Nature one becomes a Buddha.” The goal is to explore the meanings that each of these lines convey, and how they might have been shaped by the previous ideologies of Indian Buddhism and Daoism. …show more content…
This is best evident in the Yogacara School, “All dharmas are preceded by mind (manas), chieftained by mind, made of mind” (Robinson 92). The mind is the birthplace of reality; however, this reality is hidden from the naked eye due to our attached and egotistic thinking. Undoubtedly, we all think of ourselves having ownership of property, money, cars, and whatever else. Once, these links are established they cause us to crave even more, and these material items began to have control of our lives. The mind is the locus of understanding, so having a clear mind uncontaminated by worldly desires allows one to see true reality (Nirvana). These transmissions are all within the mind like all phenomena. At this point, readers might be stumped by the abstractness of the teachings of this religion. Keep in mind that people spend years trying to understand the profundity these messages entail and don’t always succeed. Hopefully Mazu (a great Chan Master) can elaborate more on this, “The principle and phenomena are not different; everything is wonderful function and there is no other principle. They all come from the mind.” (Foster and Shoemaker 45). As we mentioned before, these transmissions are unique because they are not rationally passed down. The variety of these tactics are used to break into the actual mind (the one not clouded by your …show more content…
To clarify, the true nature of our mind is that of a Buddha. Yet again, we see these Chan teachings relating to those of Indian Buddhism, “The new term Tathagata-garbha makes the concept more explicit. In the second sense, the womb of Tathagatahood is the embryonic Buddha consisting of the pure dharmas in a person's store-consciousness.” (Robinson 94). All sentient (living) beings possess the qualities that are of a buddha, they just have not been expressed. No matter the bad actions or thoughts you have done there is a buddha that is in you. Why have we not expressed these qualities? Because of our own attachments to the world. Huangpo of the Linji school provides a great analysis on this topic, “all wriggling beings possessed of sentient life and all the Buddhas and the bodhisattvas are of this one substance and do not differ. Differences arise from wrong-thinking only and lead to the creation of kinds of karma” (Foster and Shoemaker 92). This further relates to that break in ordinary thought we mentioned earlier. Once, we bust through the barriers of ordinary thinking, we will be able to live without suffering. This clarity is your own buddha nature illuminating throughout your body. Although, both traditions of Buddhism emphasize this teaching, Chan Buddhist argue that seeing this own nature can happen suddenly. Juxtaposed to Indian Buddhism, enlightenment is supposed to be a long process that
These two major figures influenced the lifestyle of billions of people from all over the world. Throughout the book Hanh shows a deeper connection between Christianity and Buddhism by renewing the reader's understanding of the main importances of the two religions. Hanh also highlights the importance of being open minded about other religions and emphasizes that people need to be open to the commonalities and or similarities seen
The Buddha, who is the origin of Buddhism, had to face
Religions have existed for millenniums, cultivation and sculpting the old world into what it is today. Each religion is unique in its own sense, meaning that each religion is its own mix, it’s own jam. Every one of these jams, or religions, have been spread across nations. Some jams are smooth like butter, finding easy acceptance and even easier assimilation, whereas some jams are chunky and laden with difficulties. Buddhism’s jam was one of interesting circumstance, containing a vary of smooth and chunky consistency.
Karen Armstrong and Robert Thurman wrote their essays, “Homo religiosus” and “Wisdom”, respectively, describing two words, “being” and “void”. These words, although have opposite meanings, describe the same spiritual experience that come about through different means. By definition, “being” is a kind of fullness or completeness of existence and “void” is emptiness or a negation of existence. Armstrong believes that “being” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana” while Thurman believes that “void” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana”. Although these terms seem to be opposite in the literal sense of defining them, they lead to the same outcome: not being at the center of one’s own universe.
Buddha drew on these pivotal events that unfolded during his lifetime to shape the core concepts of Buddhism, with his teachings
Using this technique, he posits one will eventually find the truth and be on the right path. This summarization can be likened to Conze’s assertion that Buddhist thinkers loved paradox and contradictions. With this, he associates Buddhist thought with
Zong Mi, a leading Buddhist scholar defends Buddhism by praising it as it was established “according to the demands of the age and the needs of various beings” during a time of need. (Doc 5) Also, in Zong Mi’s defense of Buddhism he is careful not to criticize Confucianism or Daoism as to avoid angering Emperor Wu after his revival of the imperial structure, instead he calls the founder’s of these religions “perfect sages.” (Doc 5) On the other hand, the Buddha simply lays out the basic principles of how to achieve nirvana in the Buddhist tradition of “The Four Noble Truths.”
The first attitude is soteriological inclusiveness, this show that gender is not a factor important in attaining enlightenment in Buddhism. Any one and any sentient being can attain enlightenment. The second attitude is institutional
Ideal Practitioners in Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism each have their own ideal practitioners described in their teachings. These ideal practitioners provide a role-model and an ideal path for their followers. They also help followers and outsiders understand the important values of each tradition. In regards to Buddhism, this paper will delve into two ideal practitioners; one from Theravāda Buddhism and the other from Mahāyāna Buddhism. Theravāda Buddhism’s ideal practitioner is called an arhat (or Arahant).
It talks of ideas related to good governance, harmony in social order and emphasis on relationships. In the beginning, Buddhism were only for men. Also, in Buddhism, one follows a disciplined life to move through and understand that nothing in ourselves is of one being. The Buddhist teaching regarding suffering is based on the Four Noble truths: 1.
Firstly, it is like-minded with knowledge of humans and brains. Secondly, it accounts for the close relation we think there is between mind and body. When we talk about how a person thinks or believes, we are talking about how a human behaves. Thirdly, it is a monistic theory removing mental substance, which makes it an acceptable theory for materialists.
We then start to see the world “as it is”, and not as we expect it to be, or want it to be, or what we fear it might be! It consists of starting to focus our attention on our breath, as it flows in and out of the body. We are then able to observe our thoughts as they arise in our mind, and realise that these thoughts come and go on their own, like the wandering clouds in
Even though Buddha didn’t think that his teachings would come this far and even become a religion, it has become a big part of the world. His therapeutic methods helped millions of people throughout the centuries according to Buddha Philosophy and Western
It was found politically useful and harbored differences amongst different sects, without breeding conflicts. Increasing popularity beginning the 12th century reflected the two kinds of teachings concerning Amida Buddha (external source) and divine assistance; “Nirvana” and “Rebirth in pure land”. The former was later rejected by scholars. Later, however, Zen Buddhism became popular, which rejected the idea of external divine source such as Amida, and focused on a highly disciplined form of meditation known as Zazen, which valued less importance on religious texts and philosophical discussions. Transmission of teachings in an unbroken chain of succession from the master to the disciple, starting from the historic Buddha himself was emphasized under Zen form.
It also became an agent of mental and practical liberation to the oppressed peoples and of economic development to the disadvantaged peoples. “Engaged Buddhism” is defined by the intention of Buddhists of whatever sect to apply the values and teachings of Buddhism, especially compassion and love, to the problems of society in a nonviolent way, and are motivated by concern for others’ welfare, and is served as a channel to express their own Buddhist practices. So, “Engaged Buddhism” is neither a new Buddhist sect nor does it belong to one of the established sects. This engagement is not detached from Buddhist spirituality, but it is a modern phenomenon to express their Buddhism spirits and values to the problems of society (King, The Social Ethics of Engaged Buddhism, 2005). On the other hand, the reason of emergence of “Engaged Buddhism” was similar to the third problem Taixu discovered as I mentioned above.