What Sternberg might be trying to say is that a leader who depends too much on his hard knowledge alone might overlook the other important details. In this case, I can understand how a leader’s inflexibility is a drawback to a group’s common goal but since intelligence can be in terms of academic/analytical or practical/emotional, it is hard for me to agree with all that Sternberg
I am comfortable sharing such information with my close circle because I get assurance and support which I would not get if I kept that information to myself. On the other hand, I would not share it with people I am not close to because it is a bit too personal and I would feel like I was oversharing my life. It is also information that is too sensitive to share with people I do not
These skills are not only applicable in the counselling setting to form therapeutic relationship; they are also essential in daily life to convey information in a healthier way instead of finger pointing and blaming others, especially during conflict. To illustrate, the practice of “I” statements were especially useful in expressing my discomfort due to someone’s behaviour since it allowed me to convey my discomfort clearly while reducing the defensiveness of the person. Besides that, I used to have superficial relationship with others as I avoided touching on people’s inner feelings due to my fear of not providing any constructive feedback to resolve their issues. Nevertheless, this has taught me that conversations do not merely revolve around advice giving; by actively listening to others, that could also serve as the best form of support. After understanding this, I am more willing to listen to my friends’ feelings and provide emotional support which deepens our
"While slacktivism can inspire discourse on important issues, it often does not lead to conversation on how to take further steps of support." states Gabriella Corvese in her essay, 'Putting Action Back in Activism'. This statement puts perspective on the slacktivist issue because it makes you question the effectiveness that it has over people. Does slacktivism help beyond spreading word? It may at times, but most of the time people are not doing anything more than clicking a 'like' button or going out to actually do something about it.
Personally when I get the chance to express myself, I talk a lot, and I like to explore the problem with a professional guide. And in solution-focused brief therapy, problems are not analysed or talk in depth. Also the time is too short, when it comes to solution I like to obtain several ideas, plan A, plan B even a plan Y is necessary, but the therapy being short does not provide that luxury. And with the family approach, the gender separation might disturb me, and the lack emphasize on the emotional lives. I prefer the family therapy, because the problems or issues could be overcome by the support given, the relationship boundaries.
Additionally, my subordinates recognize that I apply Intellectual Stimulation because I value their opinions and point of view. I realize that I lack the Individual Considerations and the Inspirational Motivation to be a Transformative Leader. Also, I could be sacrificing the sense of purpose from my subordinates and hindering a strong relationship with my peers and supervisor by letting things that I deem unimportant to slide by misusing Coping Behavior, Cognitive Flexibility, “who, stakes, and situation”,
I feel there is a lot on my plate to create stress. Secondly, I do not agree with the results that say I avoid problems and because of that hold myself back from taking on challenges. I take on challenges whenever given the opportunity because I believe it helps me grow as a person. I also understand that you can’t succeed if you don’t take the chance and that failure is a great tool to learn from. Q- share three stress-reducers you currently use to manage stress.
Furthermore, we may become future colleagues. However, this way of managing conflict was not appropriate as it could harbour negative feeling and those feelings may reemerge when another conflict arises (Sullivan, 2012). I tried to reason out with him why I felt that wearing a mask and gloves was adequate PPE as mixing the thickener took only a brief moment to do. Furthermore, i did not have direct contact with the patient or her environment. I feel that if he was willing to listen and empathise to my reasoning, things would have turned out
At one point in time conversation was about debate and political reasoning as suggested by Habermas. However, in our contemporary world it has evolved into not only as Shudson suggests conversation being seen as useless in terms of democracy but also a way for individuals to exhibit their knowledge and experience of everyday life. The source of discomfort suggested by Shudson is thus replaced with a need to seek that discomfort and challenge one’s opinions and not in a positive matter as that praised by Habermas. Media outlets provide the space not for debate and intellectual growth but for one to exhibit one’s knowledge in relation to others. The concept of illusion brought up by Silverstone promotes the illusion of intellectuality individuals exhibit by reading articles or watching short Facebook clips to make themselves feel informed about the unreachable world of the other.
There’s many options of how to be a good leader, interconnect well or simply just be better. Nevertheless when searching the bad side, failure we sometimes jump at the fact that it could happen to us. Possibly that is why it appears to be one of the least discussed topics. Who wishes to admit to their failure certainly not to your manager or company owner? Nevertheless failure still occurs.