The traditional semi-military structure of policing is very different from the structure of team policing. The traditional style of policing utilized in a hierarchy which is military style also have operations which are in the style of a military (Hixson, 2015). Since mankind originated, there has been conflict. As people changed, their conflicts also changed. It is this change of conflicts which led to armies existing in the community. These military styles of policing were intended to protect the citizens and guarantee the enforcement of the law (Myhill & Bradford, 2013). For traditional policing, the military style has served the police well in many ways. It has developed a disciplinary structure in which regular people who have been hired …show more content…
According to Hixson (2015), the implementation of the paramilitary composition is founded on the fact that the police work together with the military and most police departments all over the world developed from the military. Overall, police departments have different roles which include fighting and preventing crime, emergency response services such as first aid and firefighting, protecting the rights of the constitution for the citizens, controlling traffic, resolving conflicts, and many others (Kania & Davis, …show more content…
Community policing includes citizens when trying to discover the answers to the problems. It also tries to eradicate the fear that has been in the public and maintain order in society. The police attack this in a strategic method such that the relationship between the community and the police is retained. Before any matter by the community police is handled, they initially have to make certain that a camaraderie between their system and the public is built (Hofstede, 2013). This is done through team policing which officially started in 1970 after the realization that the policies of the police department could not work better unless the community was involved (Carter, Phillips, & Gayadeen, 2014). The police were separated from the community and regarded as enemies to the general public. This made crime control completely problematic. The police needed to work cohesively with the community in order to eliminate further occurrences of crime, so officers were placed in different areas of the community in order to study the behavior of the citizens in society (Myhill & Bradford,
Without the support and approval of society, police officials can rarely meet the demand of their job (Argosy University,
Even worse, police presence opens up the possibility of violence in community spaces that ought to be safe. That same man witnessed cops tossing one of his neighbors on the cement because he was gambling (Schenwar and Law p. 4). As these examples of the presence of police in the community suggest, rather than making police interactions less hostile, community policing just creates more opportunities for escalation and violence.
“Only about one-third of a patrol officer’s activities are devoted to criminal law enforcement” (Walker & Katz, 2013, p. 4). Many other areas of work that the law enforcement officer does consist of social work, maintaining public safety, and solving many problems of the community. Most police officers would like to know that they have a warrior mentality about them. This is because “When officers find themselves in a dangerous situation, they must have the mental mettle to never give up, fight on, and prevail against all odds” (Brocklin, 2015).
Now, 28 law-enforcement agencies, including police departments in New York, Seattle, Las Vegas, Memphis and San Francisco, have requested program materials and inquired about the training”(A. Novotney). We see that there are positives when it comes to training the police. This police training began because of one major reason and that reason was that in 2005 police misconduct had reached an all time high in New Orleans. There were a lot of high profile beatings and unjustified shootings by the police. This lead on to the police being trained so that there would be less violence used against civilians and so that there would be less chaos in the community.
Policing has been around a long time, ever since the 19th century to be more specific. In that span of time between the 19th century and today, policing has gone through many changes, to lead us to the state of policing we are in today, which is now a complete 180 from how it used to be. Way back when the first settlers came to America, communities actually policed themselves. They believed that this was the most effective way to uphold the law, or whatever they called it back then. They had many ways to keep people in line such as public disapproval, shunning, and even public humiliation.
The development of the Bomb Squad and SWAT Teams are prime examples of how police departments are militarizing. Supporters of the militarization of police forces state that it is essential to keep up with the potential threats of terrorism and gangs. It is the police’s duty to keep their country safe and if the only way to accomplish this is to militarize the police, it is necessary. While it aids in keeping the community safe, the main reason supporters encourage militarization is that it protects the police officers from being harmed (Sheeler). Their heavy equipment protects them, enabling them to defend the community.
The federal dollar began to flow and agencies were getting equipment and training. Local police forces used their funds to get military equipment. A retired police in New Haven said, “I was offered tanks, bazookas, anything I wanted”(74). Obviously, we as a society are not getting what we need from our nation’s police. Justice system
Which influence officer behaviors to make peace with citizens. The advantages for community policing is that both the officer and citizens get to come in accordance with reducing crime and increase the security in the community and neighborhoods. This era gave citizen a voice. To help assist and work with officers as community watch to reduce crime. Unlike the reform era, who attempted to be
These challenges shaped the evolution of police departments, prompting them to adapt, strategize, and reform, constantly reshaping their approach to maintaining the peace. This historical panorama provides an invaluable context for understanding the police departments of today. The twin ideals of authority and service persist, albeit in more complex and plural societies. Today's law enforcement agencies grapple with the same challenges, albeit amplified by technological advances and societal changes.
The militarization of police has become an increasingly contentious issue in the United States, with concerns raised about the scope, mission, and perception of law enforcement agencies across the country. The concept of militarization refers to the adoption of military tactics, equipment, and strategies by police departments, a process which began in 1965 with the inception of SWAT teams in Philadelphia (). With the aim of law enforcement being the enhancement of capabilities in high-risk situations, this outcome was inevitable. The militarization of police has intensified and expanded since that time, with military vehicles, equipment, and weapons becoming commonplace across the country. A large contributor to this phenomenon has been the
Community policing is a philosophy and an organizational strategy that promotes a new partnership between people and their police. It is based on the premise that both the police and the community must work together to identify prioritize and solve contemporary problems such as crime , drugs , fear of crime , social and physical disorder and over all neighborhood decay , with the goals of improving the overall quality of life in the area .It required wide department commitment from every civilian . That challenges all personal to find ways to express this new philosophy in their jobs.
2. Literature Reviews 2.1 Perspectives on Community Policing This section provides a review of the relevant literature that underpins this study. As argued in the previous paragraph, the concept of community policing, its drivers and purposes can be considered as key unresolved issues in the literature. In this sense, two background questions have guided this literature review section – these being: i) what is community policing; and ii) what are the key drivers for the development and application of community policing?
LICEING THE 21ST CENTURY The police are the public and the public are the police - Robert peel When we talk about the criminal justice system the public at large plays a very important role right from the prevention to reporting to the investigation of the case. The criminal justice system cannot achieve its goal without the active participation of the general public. If we take a look at the ancient police setup in medivial and ancient india we come across that there were various provisions for the participation of the public working with the police. The word police, inspires confidence inspires a sense of truse, security, commitment, and public service.
Literature Review *Needs Serious Help The literature used for this subject is closely related to one another with key differences between each different articles approach. They all address the concept of police corruption and deviance in general but take different stances on the cause of it and how it’s fundamentally made within a flawed system. The articles to follow suit all provide insight to previous methods of addressing the matter.
General issues of police forces. The importance of public image to the organization An unfavorable image can affect how the police perform their duties (Goldsmith, 2003): citizens are reluctant to address the police in problematic situations (Davis & Henderson, 2003; Tyler, 2006), to voluntary cooperate with the police forces (Huq, Tyler & Schulhofer, 2011; Tyler & Fagan, 2008) or to positively respond to the various police requests (Bradford & Jackson, 2010; Jackson, Hough, Bradford, Hohl & Kuha, 2012). The more so, in terms of the general public there is no "effective or real police action " that can be separated from the image people hold on the police activity (Salmi, Voeten & Keskinen 2000 ). In addition, in the absence of a favorable image we cannot talk about a consented police act (Goldsmith, 2005).