Holding elections for government officials is a democratic feature of government, but the requirements were not equal. For the election to be completely democratic it has to be fair, all people must have a say in government. Despite their race, gender, or religion. Although colonial America’s government was democratic it had some undemocratic features like selective rights and unfair elections so the democracy was a work in progress at the time. With the distance from Britain helping with the planning of the government, over time the colonial version of democracy was improved.
), the government should not interfere with a free market economy (A.S), the freedom of speech (Volt. ), the government could be overruled (J.L), and the government should rule according to the will of the people. Nevertheless, these ideals are important because they shaped the government that we have today. Therefore, these ideals massively aroused the
The colonists created a system in which the government had limited power but enough to maintain the country while the states and the people received equally limited power as well. The Constitution still protects its citizes on several accounts, including through democracy and power distribution, nevertheless failing in premitting the President to wield all powers during a national emergency. As for the future, the Constitution will continue to be amended to protect the citizens to the best of its ability from tyrants and their dictatorial
Currently, the France, that people know today, is the aftermath of the French Revolution. The government of France “is a unique hybrid of presidential and parliamentary systems that reflect rich political traditions and culture” (Guardian). In the current France, there is no absolute monarchy. There is no divine ruler like King Louis XVI. France is now a democratic country with the President as the leader along with his hers subsidiaries.
The representatives in parliament are elected by the people and they have to be responsible to the people and protect them. The representatives in parliament has no greater power than what is given to them and they cannot act against the best interests of the people. Political parties has to earn respect from the public in order to succeed. Today parliamentary sovereignty is done away with and the Supreme law is the Constitution
So, we should keep the options more open for elections. Also, each state has two senators to be chosen by the state legislature, not voters. Also, popular among most states rights proponents is dual federalism. Dual Federalism is an interpretation of federalism in which states and the national government have separate jurisdictions and responsibilities. It suggests that, much like in a layer cake, there are distinct; no overlapping areas of responsibility for national government and state government and each level of government is sovereign.
The most important differences between absolutism and constitutionalism are the setup of government power. In an absolutist government the monarchy has complete power; whereas in constitutionalism, the monarchy must share power with an elected assembly of representatives. Another important difference is the interests of those in charge. Absolutist rulers usually pursuit their personal interests. Constitutionalist rulers think more of the common people, or the country as a whole.
The documents they drafted were contracts that defined the powers of government, as did the old colonial charters, but they drew their authority from the people, not from the royal seal of a distant king. As written documents the state constitutions were intended to represent a fundamental law, superior to the transient whims of ordinary legislation. Most of these documents included bills of rights, specifically guaranteeing long-prized liberties against later legislative encroachment. Most of them required the annual election of legislators, who were thus forced to stay in touch with the mood of the people. All of them deliberately created weak executive and judicial branches, at least by present-day standards.
The United States of America established itself as a nation that advocated a political system subjected to the construct of democracy. This system was created to represent its citizens so that they may not grow weary in a tyrant monarchy, such as that of the British before the American Revolution . The forefathers gathered to establish a constitution that respected the rights of its citizens and debated with much tension to how authority would be exercised in such a representative government. History has shared an active evolution to the structure of government within the United States , yet America today is actively still subjected to the famous political party establishment that was made in the years of 1783-1815. The political party commonly known were the Federalist and the Democratic Republicans – two very different ideal groups that helped change America.
Aristotle thought the government should work for an accepted good through effective mean. He thought that a monarchy was an appropriate form of a government. Aristotle and the middle class. Aristotle 's argues six points that regards the middle class and how they can make the city better. One is that they obey the reasoning of the constitution.
The national and state government both have power which the people can appoint to represent them. It imposes laws to keep corruption and illegal behavior from those that can hurt citizens. Under the constitution we have checks and balances. It distributes power onto the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative so no one is more powerful than the other. Our government has created laws to keep peace and order within its borders.
With the Articles of Confederation, one strength was that the power was spread out over the country. This lets all states help decide what’s best for the nation, instead of the central government have all the power. A weakness to this is that it might lead to a lack of unity within the United States. Another positive to this type of government is the ability for each state to have different laws. This allows each state to do what’s best for themselves.
The Electoral College system is a long process but a fair system. The theory behind this system is to ensure that all of the states, even the small ones, receive a fair voice in the election. In doing so, this will assist in the election process. Electoral College is defined as, “an unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013, p.514). The Electoral system is a large part of the cohesiveness in our country and requires the distribution of support throughout our election process.
Federalism itself allows the common man to have representation at the state level. It is the government 's duty to enforce what the Constitution and therefore follow what it has to say. Although the people do have representatives, they sometimes lack the true ability to see what is really needed.
Through persistence, interest groups are able to keep the government not only updated on what’s going on in the country, but they make sure that the people still have a say in what goes on. For democracy to actually work, the people must play their part in the system and the government must listen, some order and balance must be maintained and the interest group’s power to influence the government makes sure the government system really is democratic. A great example is the women’s suffrage movement. Women, as human beings and equal citizens, deserved the ability to vote from the beginning, but due to the strictly racist, classist and sexist mindset of the original leaders, they were unfairly treated and were given no say in what went on politically. Over time women gathered the courage to fight for their rights.