Ashley Toledo Mrs. Zech English 12 Period 7 14 March 2023 Compare and Contrast Essay Oftentimes in stories authors relate to the same thing whether it has to do with a theme or a past event. Both “Back to My Own Country” and “Shooting an Elephant” discuss the classification of color. However, Levy’s essay talks about growing up differently than those of her color; whereas, Orwell’s short story talks about doing something because of peer pressure. In “Back to My Own Country” the author Andrea Levy wrote a narrative essay. She talks a lot about her early childhood and what it was like for her while growing up. She begins by saying “I remember a journey I took on a London bus when I was a young girl. It was the early nineteen sixties”(Levy 691). At this time in the world seeing someone of color wasn’t very common. She goes more into detail by providing the year and how she could tell the guy wasn’t from around that area. During this time people of …show more content…
In this essay he talks a lot about how he was disliked by a large number of people. He talks about being a “sub divisional police officer of the town, and in an aimless, petty kind of way anti-European feeling was very bitter”(Orwell 705). He feels like he doesn’t belong as well because he is European. However, he is later on forced to do something because of peer pressure unlike Andrea Levy’s story. He begins by saying “but I did not want to shoot the elephant”(Orwell 709). He had been watching this elephant for a while and it wasn’t currently disrupting the people. Causing him to not want to kill the elephant because technically it wasn’t causing any harm. He also talks about the worth of the elephant by saying “alive, the elephant was worth at least a hundred pounds, dead he would only be worth the value of his tusks, five pounds possibly”(Orwell 709). By him stating that observation it shows that if it were up to him he wouldn’t kill the
Compare and Contrast Draft “Back to My Own Country” written by Andrea Levy and “Shooting an Elephant” written by George Orwell demonstrate the theme of people’s different backgrounds of culture and society. However, Orwell’s essay represents the differences between law and moral beliefs, demonstrating no moral freedom. Meanwhile, in Levy’s essay, she discusses her experience of freedom through learning and self-discovery. In “Back to My Own Country” the author talks about her whole life experiences.
In Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. gives an inside look at the racism and oppression that African American’s had to face during the early 1960’s. Not only did King portray the oppression he dealt with through his writing, but, George Orwell did as well in his story Shooting an Elephant. As shown in both readings, Martin Luther King and George Orwell had both been oppressed, but in two very different ways. King discusses the oppression that had spread throughout the USA created by racist, white America, while Orwell dealt with oppression by the Burmese because he had been apart of Britain’s imperial law enforcement. The difference between King and Orwell is that King had been oppressed because something he could not change,
In the short story Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell a Police Officer who is not from Burma is forced to go out and kill a wild elephant. Orwell whom is the main character is not from Burma and when he goes about his quest to hunt down and kill the elephant he goes about the actual killing of the elephant. The local people begin to dislike him because of the way he went about putting the animal down. This story is often interpreted as an interpretation of how orwell viewed the Indian Imperial police. This story Follows the quest motif to the letter; every aspect of this story seems to fit in with the motif.
As an opponent of political and social injustice, author George Orwell shows his disapproval for political corruption and political injustice through the display of pathos. Likewise, in “Shooting an Elephant,” readers detect George Orwell’s subjective opinions on imperialism through persuasion using pathos. Throughout the essay, the narrator uses expressions and feelings of fear, hatred, anxiety, doubt, and distress at the fact that he is in a position of no authority to inform the audience of his disapproval.
Twentieth-century English writer George Orwell, in the nonfictional essay “Shooting an Elephant,” delves into “the real nature of imperialism – the real motives for which despotic governments act” (Orwell 149). In his essay recounting his experience as a police officer in Burma, not only does Orwell capture his anguish, ambivalence and guilt from the killing of the animal, but also effectively conveys the perils of imperialism upon both the oppressed and the oppressor through deliberate use of irony, tone, and detailed physical description. “Shooting an Elephant” is almost entirely characterized by irony – from the very beginning to the end – that reveals Orwell’s ambivalence towards the natives and hollowness of British Raj in the East,
Zachary Conners SUNY – Eng. 12 Mrs. O’Malley December 15, 2014 “Shooting an Elephant” is a persuasive rhetorical piece written by George Orwell used to describe Orwell’s feelings about imperialism. Orwell uses pathos, logos, and ethos to convey his feelings towards imperialism and how destructive it can be. Born 1903, George Orwell, novelist, essayist, and critic, was best known for his novels Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty- Four. Son of a British servant, Orwell spent most of his days in India, where his father had been stationed.
Even though Orwell did commit the crime of shooting an elephant, throughout the story he used ethos, pathos, and figurative language to convince the audience if given the opportunity he would never shoot an elephant again because the elephant represents the innocence of people. First and foremost, Orwell establishes his ethos. As stated in Everything’s an Argument, ethos is described as the author's credibility. He establishes his ethos right from the beginning of the story when he states he works for the British but he despises them.
“Shooting an Elephant” is an essay written by Geoge Owell in 1936 that describes a specific experience he had while serving as a police officer in Burma. Orwell wrote about this encounter because it was extremely memorable and made him question his morals and position of power. This essay uses Orwell as the narrator and describes the instance where he was faced with killing an elephant to please the public despite his personal beliefs. The essay begins by explaining Orwell’s job as a police officer and the hate he recived for being in that posiiton. He desperately wanted out of his job because he saw the terrible things that the government did to people and the constant imperialism he disagreed with.
The purpose of “Shooting an Elephant” was to show that sometimes people do things they know aren’t the right decision just to impress everyone else. The officer felt that,“It seemed to me that it would be murder to shoot him” (Orwell 4). As he shot the elephant he
This narrative piece is an effective expository technique that describes the narrator’s thoughts and tone. Orwell uses oxymoron such as “grinning corpse” and paradox phrases such as “the story always sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes”. Another paradox statement is shown in “I perceived this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”. Orwell’s decisions were briskly altered as he was deciding on whether to kill the elephant or not. His mind altered from “I ought not to shoot him” to “I had got to do it” and also to “But I did not want to shoot the elephant”.
Hannah Edmiston Boudreau AP Language Friday 25 September, 2015 Shooting an Elephant Analyzing Rhetorical Devices Shooting an Elephant, written by George Orwell in 1936, describes his experience working as a British officer located in Moulmein, Burma. He writes his essay to reveal the cruelty and disastrous outcome of imperialism he witnesses. Orwell uses strong resource of language such as symbolism, metaphors and imagery to express his disdain for British imperialism. Orwell uses symbolism to connect the character of the elephant to the effects of imperialism.
Prompted by the influences of society, greedy and ignorant individuals in The Picture of Dorian Gray, “The Painted Door,” and “Shooting an Elephant,” all submit to change in order to achieve eternal happiness. The Picture of Dorian Gray written by Oscar Wilde is about a beautiful man trying to make a life in the Victorian era in Britain. “The Painted Door,” written by Sinclair Ross, regarding the feeling of needing a change of lifestyle from isolation to appreciation and affection. Lastly, the author George Orwell, developed “Shooting an Elephant” based on a common colonist view “When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” All three of these short stories convey the ideas of an individual pursuing happiness based
Shooting An Elephant The story “ Shooting An Elephant” by George Orwell is about a man who lives in Bruma as a police officer. Bruma is under British control and they are not aloud to own guns. Being a British officer, the narrator was aloud to own one at the time. The story is told in first person, as readers learn about a traumatizing experience the narrator had in his past.
In George Orwell 's short story titled “Shooting an Elephant” presented an event that changed a countries civilization. George’s life in Burma, and the prejudice placed by the people he oppressed inspired his writing through the uses of setting, style, and theme. In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell no specific event influenced this piece rather it was an accumulation of many small events of prejudice and hate by an opposing group of
In his essay, “Shooting an Elephant” George Orwell describes his experience of killing an elephants when he was an officer in Burma. He explains how the local Burmese hated him and saw him as the authority of the repressive white British. He mentions that he also had the same feeling about the local Burmese. Even though he hated the Thyestean imperialism but he also hated what he called the yellow-faced and evil-spirted Burmese people. One day, he was told that an elephant was destroying the bazaar and killing people.