Compare And Contrast Call Of The Wild

534 Words3 Pages

Have you ever read a book then watched the movie and noticed that some things were gone and missing when you look back in the book and compare the things that were there and what wasn't there? Today I will be telling you the compare and contrast of Call of The Wild about what happened and my thesis will be about how different the movie explains the story from the Novel.

1 Instincts.
The Novel and the Movie both have a main focus which is Buck who is the main central character of the movie and story. Although they each have their own way of expressing their way, Buck shows his instincts. In the Novel Buck just has those instincts in him and he fights with them to show him the way to survive. In the Movie, Buck has a Black Wolf that shows him like when he was fighting spitz in the novel he was getting thrown on the ground until his instincts kicked in and he beat spitz. In the movie, he was on the ground when he saw the black wolf standing there which gave him the strength and courage to beat spitz. …show more content…

The Movie shows more of a less violent scene during the part where John Thorton was shot; there was no blood around the area of the wound or on the floor. There was a little blood around his hand but not a lot of blood. Also during the part where Buck fights Spitz in the book, it says he ripped and tore the flesh of spitz and broke his bone. In the movie, it shows he throws Spitz over and stands on him, and lets him go so after that Spitz ran away. In the story, it says how they ate Spitz alive while he was down on the floor. So the story is more bloody and gore than the

Open Document