Have you ever read a book and then watched a movie and noticed that some things were missing or gone when you looked back in the book to compare what was there and what was not? There are many differences, like how the movie changed a lot of the theme then, how the book described it, and how the film is more faithful than the book. The book is better because it tells a great story and explains what would happen to dogs if they were sled dogs. There is also a huge difference because they published the book in 1903 and made the movie in 2020.
1 Instincts. The novel and the movie both have a primary focus, which is Buck, the main central character of the film and story. Although they each have their way of expressing themselves, Buck shows his instincts. In the novel, Buck has those instincts and fights with them to guide him to survive the wilderness. In the movie, Buck has a Black Wolf that directs him. For example, when fighting Spitz in the novel on page 34, he gets thrown on the ground until his instincts kick in. He then sprang into Spitz, ripping and tearing the flesh until he cracked the bone and left Spitz on the floor to die. In the movie, he was on the ground until
…show more content…
During the movie, there was a scene where Hal shot John Thorton, but there was no blood around the area of the wound or on the floor. There was a little blood around his hand, but not much blood. Also, in the book section where Buck fights Spitz, it is stated that he ripped and tore Spitz's flesh and broke his bone. The story says, " His teeth closed in on spitz fore leg. There was a crunch of breaking a bone. Then tried to get up but broke the right foreleg". On page 35, chapter 3, Spitz is alive while the dogs feast on him while Buck leaves the scene leaving Spitz and the other dogs in the distance. The movie shows him throwing Spitz over, standing on him, and letting him go. So after that, Spitz runs away. The story shows more bloody and violent scenes than the movie
Billy worked hard to save up for two hunting dogs. He trained his dogs to be the best coon hounds in the Ozarks. Lots of exciting events occured in this book for example when a mountain lion got into a fight with the dogs. Or when one of the boys that he made a bet with dies. There are many other tragic things about the book but in my opinion the movie was better.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
Buck stood and looked on, the successful champion, the dominant primordial beast who had made his kill and found it good” (London 21). One’s perspective on Buck should have changed by now because he has gone from being an innocent dog to becoming a dog that kills to get what he wants. Has Buck become the bad guy now and Spitz is the good guy or are they both the same? How did Buck win one might be wondering could Spitz have let him win because early in the chapter Spitz was described as a “... practiced fighter.
While many of the things in the book don't quite match the movie there are still many similarities.
For starters, Major Anderson was a girl in the movie, and a guy in the book. In the book, when Ender got onto the spacecraft to go to Battleschool, no one had their seat belts on, Ender was the first to put his on, when in the movie everyone had theirs on already. You might not of noticed this one, but in the movie, they made them take self defense classes, but in the book Ender decided to take self defense classes because of Bonzo. When Ender and Bonzo were fighting in the bathroom, in the book Alai came in to get Ender out of there, and in the movie, Alai didn't. Graff visits Valentine at her house instead of at her school in the movie, and in the book he meets her at the school.
In the movie, a scene was added to the book, the scene when Mrs. Foster and Winnie go to the bread shop. Another difference in the scene is that the book doesn’t include the scene at the bar were Miles is playing cards with another person. As well as the scene of the campfire and the dancing with Jesse and Winnie. Differences can also be in actions and what the actors say just like when Jesse and Winnie jump into the lake in the movie, and in the book Miles and Jesse jump into the lake, Jesse also tell Winnie the secret and Miles tells the story in detail instead of Mae, they didn’t discuss who takes Winnie to the lake, but in the book they do, the constable doesn’t go with the man in the yellow suit but Mr. Foster and his people do and on the other hand the constable went. Another Jesse never gives the bottle to Winnie but in the book he does, also the man in the yellow suit shoots Jesse with a gun and Jesse shows him he has everlasting life.
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
Another difference is that in the movie they go into town, but in the book it 's never mentioned. Something else that was different was that in the book the mood was happy most of the time, while in the movie the mood was sad. A difference between the book and the movie is that in the book momma was going to burn Byron, but in the movie she does not burn him. A big difference is that in the
Although they each have their own way of expressing their way, Buck shows his instincts. In the Novel Buck just has those instincts in him and he fights with them to show him the way to survive. In the Movie, Buck has a Black Wolf that shows him like when he was fighting spitz in the novel he was getting thrown on the ground until his instincts kicked in and he beat spitz. In the movie, he was on the ground when he saw the black wolf standing there which gave him the strength and courage to beat spitz.
The last distinction I found was the age of Cindy Lu. In the book, the say that Cindy Lu was no more than two. But in the movie, she looks older than two. Cindy Lu has a bigger role in the movie than the book. I found many differences in the book and movie.
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
The plot is same regarding Chris’ journey in both the movie and the book. However it is the execution of the book that gives Into the Wild more depth. Unlike the movie the book is portrayed through the eyes of Jon Krakauer
In the movie, though, not everything was relevant to what had happened in the book. Therefore, the book and movie have many differences, but also many similarities.
Books vs. Movies The constant battle between watching a movie and reading a book has lead to many disagreements. Many valid arguments can be made in favor of each as well as each having it’s own disadvantages, yet the question still remains unanswered. Books and movies have many similarities and differences when it comes to experience, development, and imagery. To begin, there are a variety of reasons that make movies not as good as books. The experience, the depth, and the imagery are the three main aspects one needs in order to understand why movies are not as good as books.