César Chávez César Chávez was an activist and leader who wanted better pay, better treatment, and working conditions for farm workers. He used marches, boycotts on growers, and hunger strikes to get his message out on the treatment of farm workers. Dolores Huerta and César Chávez formed the National Farm Worker Association, which later became the United Farm Workers (from a merge of the union groups National Farm Worker Association and the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee). He strived to have better conditions for farm workers, since he was a farm worker when he was a child. César Chávez led marches to help farm workers with their working conditions and better pay, for farm workers had pesticide issues and didn’t get enough pay to be able to support themselves and their families.
Both of these people fought for people’s rights, spoke with citizens, and tried to motivate them to listen and join. As much as Mother Jones has done, Cesar Chavez made a bigger impact on the world. Cesar Chavez was a civil rights leader, a farm labor leader, a community organizer, a religious and spiritual figure, a champion of of militant nonviolent social changes, and a crusader for the environment and consumer rights. The authors wrote, “As a common man with an uncommon vision, Cesar Chavez stood for equality, justice and dignity for all Americans.” (Chavez Foundation, 19)
Harriet Tubman was also an activist who helped out slaves for their freedom and justice. They were being treated unfairly simply because of their skin color/race. Cesar Chavez and Harriet Tubman fought for the discrimination people were receiving, this was mainly caused because they were thought as “less than”. To illustrate my point, Cesar Chavez was also an individual who fought for rights. Likewise, Cesar had worked in the fields with his parents, so he understood how much of a pain it was to work without any breaks.
Cesar Chavez and Civil Rights Movement Kamran Shojaei Prof. Fernandez Chicano/ Chicana History December 8, 2015 Cesar Chavez, as a chicano himself, was a Mexican-American farm worker that changed the world of many individuals. Many believe he came along at the right time, the right place, and he was the right person to move chicanos and chicanas to fight for their basic human rights. His qualities as a leader inspired chicanos to defend themselves. In September 1965, under Chavez leadership, Mexican-American farm workers walked off the field and refused to pick grapes at many California venues.
Both associations later came together and formed the United Farm Workers which is still around and currently attempting to recognize a day of service in memory of Cesar Chavez. A couple of strategies Chavez would use to draw attention towards the farmer’s rights included: boycotts, strikes and marches. Chavez was also similar to Martin Luther King Jr. in the way of supporting nonviolent strikes and believing nonviolence was more powerful than violence
With many boycotts, marches, and fasting, in the end, Chavez and the farmworkers ended up winning. It was all because of his confidence and nonviolent movement. Through the act of peaceful protests, Chavez was able to settle the conflict against his own fellow
Thus by writing an article for an audience of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need, the members of the religious organization likely lobby for the farmers to not protest violently, leading many farmers to rethink their choices and decide to go the nonviolent path of protest. Chavez does a excellent job using of the aforementioned rhetorical choices to help the audience understand the power of nonviolence resistance, as time is on the side of the ones who want
Civil rights are something that is given, no matter the race, color or class. Most people take civil rights for granted and don’t think about the hard work it took to get to where we are today. There are some people, however, who always fought for their rights and for equal protection. Cesar Chavez was the influential and hard working civil rights leaders, and it’s because of him that there are civil rights today. Cesar Chavez had many events and influential people in his life that promoted his participation in civil rights.
What made Cesar Chavez an Effective leader? Cesar Chavez was born in Yuma,Arizona in 1927. He moved a lot and went to 36 different schools. He lived through the Great Depression and worked in fruit and vegetable fields as a farmer. On a regular basis California farmers would face mistreatment and abuse mainly by the growers taking advantage of them all.
Chavez asserts repeatedly that nonviolence is the only way for change to happen. The repeated use of “we”, “us” and “our” conveys the message to the audience that he is one of them. Chavez can relate to the farm workers based on his credibility (ethos) because of his past. Chavez went to work on the farm fields at a young age and knew exactly how the frustrated workers felt.
Mentioning Gandhi, and stating his thought son the best ways peacefully cause change. This is showing the audience that Chavez realizes that these men have proved their methods the best, and he doesn't want to change them just try to use them for the benefit of the people. “ The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause”. This quote really does work so well because of the organization that is used by Chavez to convey Gandhi’s message. If Chavez had not eased this very power quotes into is writing, they would not have been hear the same way.
Moral Courage and Cesar Chavez Today in 2018 California’s minimum salary wage for migrant workers is about $5-6 an hour. In the 1930’s they were paid from $0.60- 1.00 per hundred pounds offered by growers. Leaving his job in Arizona Cesar Chavez moved to California to dedicate his life to improving the treatment, pay and working conditions. By examining cesar chavez’s moral courage, how he relates to Elie Wiesel, and how and why he impacted me it is clear that Cesar Chavez was an important man. Moral Courage, the courage to take action for moral reasons in spite of the risk of unfavorable consequences.