The Chesapeake and New England regions were the first places the English settled when they came across from Europe. American Indian societies had their own way of living before they arrived, but the English brought new ideas with them that transformed and bettered these regions. Although, there were geographical and environmental aspects to the Chesapeake and New England regions that slowed their development during the 17th and 18th centuries, like cold, snowy winters and bugs that ate away at their crops. these regions soon prospered because of the seclusion of their farms from villages, well-watered grounds, and wide range of crops and animals. The Chesapeake’s farms were never far away from a water source. “Every farm, is no more than one …show more content…
This was probably because mosquitoes stay away during those cold months. However, it was good for the inhabitants because it allowed them to stay healthy and not die from these diseases. In the Chesapeake region, they didn’t have many other foods other than their abundant supply of corn, but New England's wide range of animals and plants to eat allowed them to maintain a healthy diet. “They could supplement that with fish for the sea, birds from the air, and animals from the forest” (Hawke 76). This healthy lifestyle made for higher mortality rates and increased the population. The lack of certain foods in a diet lead to pellagra. This was common in the Chesapeake region, which slowed their development before they improved their diet with fresh fruit from orchards and cider to drink instead of water. Lastly, like the Chesapeake, New England built their farms away from the city. Distance from the city “loosened ties with the village, and the later generations of New England...they were cut off from daily contact with the larger world” (Hawke 32). This could be seen as a positive or negative influence on the development of this region because it destroyed the unity among the region. However, the rural civilians were able to create their own customs and not have to abide by what the townspeople told them to
The Book “Creatures of Empire” by Virginia Dejohn Anderson sheds light into how livestock became a crucial part of life in the new world. The goal of setting a colony up in New England was to create an overseas empire. The idea was to spread Old England’s
The manure that was brought over by the livestock even changed the type of grass and plants that grew in New England. Colonists even created dams, millponds and canals in the years to come, which resulted in major changes in the fish population, mosquito diseases, and also changed the water flow in some areas. These are just some of the ecological changes that the colonists caused on New England from trying to make a completely different ecosystem into the one in
Kate Hohfeler Burton United States History 23 September 2015 William Cronon’s book, Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England identifies, examines and explains the ecological history and changes that took place in New England between the late sixteenth to the early nineteenth century, and how it affected the future of the region. In the first part of the book, Looking Backward, Cronon highlights the works of Henry David Thoreau and William Wood. In Wood’s piece of work, he recounts his 1633 journey to New England and paints a literary picture of the scene; In Thoreau’s piece of work, Walden he is considering his Concord home and the ways in which it may have been altered.
On page 13, Whitaker states “I have seen it by experience and dare boldly affirm it that sickness doth more rage in England quarterly than here yearly”, and this tells me that sickness does more damage in England in a quart of the time that it does in Virginia (Whitaker as cited in Dudley Cholberg 13). Although illness was in fact a problem starting out, it later got better for the settlers and was no longer as much of an issue. Another
On the other hand, there were fewer diseases since the cold climate killed many of the germs. Although the weather and soil made it hard for the Puritans to farm, people could still grow some crops such as pumpkins and corn. Additionally, colonists also fished for food. However, in the Middle Colonies, there were many hills and flat lands.
How the landscape and soil shape middle,new england and southern colonies New England ; the Soil in the New England region is quite rocky, hilly, and shallow. It made England hard to plant and export cash crops England was by the Atlantic ocean. The land in New England was shaped by glaciers. During the Ice Age, thick sheets of ice cut through the mountains. Glaciers pushed rocks and rich soil south.
However this was not the most important thing, the most important thing was their education. Their education can be seen in a way as part of their culture. New Englanders were people who were highly educated and view their education as a way of living and also as a necessity. For the founders of the colony of New England established little settlements that offered education for the kids and also for the adults. Also as the people settled in the colony they brought in with them books and also brought other literal devices that helped them gain more education.
70,000-100,000 Indians were already settled in the New England area in 1600. By 1700 New England contained only 93,000 Europeans inhabitants. The European and the Indians had different ideals on life and different opinions on how they should use New England’s land. The Europeans lived a life that was very reliant on settled agriculture while the Indians lived off the resources the land provided to them. Europeans were motivated by capitalism.
New England did not "have all of it 's investments tied up on one place" very like the Chesapeake. The economy depended on angling, shipbuilding, and cultivating. The cultivating in New England was done on a substantially littler scale, notwithstanding. Since the religion (and society) was so family-situated, ranches were generally sufficiently substantial to nourish one 's family, with a little overflow. It was no where close to the span of the huge estates in the Chesapeake.
This difference was contributed to religious tolerance, economics, and population. Religion was distinctly different between the New England and Chesapeake regions. Although both were overall Catholic, the degree of tolerance for
of the soil on the eastern seaboard had already become exhausted because of crops such as tobacco and poor farming methods. In New England, much of the soil was poor to begin with.
The ecological state of New England has evolved drastically over time. Most of this change can be attributed to the arrival of the first Europeans, and their views of the land and the natives already established on the land. They not only impacted the land on which they lived, but also drastically changed the Indians by introducing them to resource commodification and disease which took out large numbers of their population. Through this combined effort the Europeans took a land of plenty and transformed it into a land of scarcity. While the broad implication was the over use of the land, much more came with the Europeans from their homeland.
Both the Chesapeake colonies and the New England colonies were vital to Britain’s atlantic trade. They both had large populations and booming economies. However, they both eventually established their own cultures that were different from each other. The colonies’ differing beliefs, environments, and labor lead to the contrasting cultures. The New England Colonies were a Puritanical society, who preached against excess.
New England’s democratic practices laid the
Deer, turkey, moose, rabbit, skunk raccoon, swan, and duck. What do all of these have in common? They are all animals, but more importantly, they were all hunted in colonial times. Today I will show you hunting in colonial times. We are going to look at this in a couple different ways.