Although Americans have the freedom to vote, there are still rules and regulations set forth to make the process a more smooth flowing affair. From filling out the application to meeting the qualifications, one American can find their voice as the determining factor for a sheriff, mayor or even president. There are many need to know facts about voting, one of the biggest most controversial topics pertaining to voting is the presentation of a photo I.D. With some states standing for
A constitutional monarchy does not make rules over you and does not have power over you. This means that you as a person decide what to do and they cannot change your decision. Constitutional monarchies connect with different countries, which means that you have allies. The republic is different, the people elect the republican leader and they have written laws that they must follow as a country. Though there are many advantages to both sides of the party’s there are also disadvantages.
How are Sparta and Athens different and similar to each other? These are the types of questions that allow us to understand the two cities politically. Althought Classical Athens was a democracy, not all citizens had the same rights and benefits. Women, slaves, and foreigners were not citizens, which leaves the males as the only individuals with citizenship. Having citizenship means not being excluded from politics and having the option of serving in the Assembly.
There is a difference though between Greek democracy and United States democracy. In Greece they ran a direct democracy where every citizen had the right to participate in deliberations, law making assembly, and other governing institutions. In the United States there is a representative democracy where citizens vote for representatives rather than participating directly. This is mainly because the changes of the way of life and the amount of people making it more difficult to ran the government the way Greece had. There have been recent political movements which have shown frustration with perceived failures of representative democracy, for example the Occupy movement was inspired by direct democracy.
For example, the website “governmentvs.com” states many ideas about the people getting the right to speak out. It states “Majority rules, people’s rights, power of voting…” This sets a democracy to a form of government where it favors the people. The citizens have control and some power of what goes on in their own country. The article also states, “People have freedom and power of voting and choosing what they want.” The main idea about a democracy is having the people have rights to speak up in the government. This system favors and encourages the citizens to feel as if they are a part of the government.
Because democracy is not based on quality, but on quantity. The majority party has the authority in power. In addition, people who do not have the intelligence, vision and corrupt could have been elected to state officials. That mean the country government by incompetent persons, democracy can only be run by people who are not competent. Because in a parliamentary, every citizen is allowed to take part, while not everyone is suited to that role.
Other than being a good learning opportunity it gives the people a voice in the government. The article Why Jury Trials are Important to a Democratic Society says “We do not want judges and lawyers making every important decision; they are not representative of the people of the United States. Juries provide the voice of common sense and the perspective of the citizen to our developing law of the land.” Judges and lawyers are only a small part of people in the United States having juries allows for all different people to come and represent their opinion and make a choice based solely on common sense and
Consent is not always risen from a direct act, it could be indirect and many philosophers have tried to get around this whole concept of indirect consent. A classic example of indirect consent, could be nationwide elections. By taking part in the elections, you are indirectly consenting to the authority of the state, because if you intend to become obligated by voting then you are allowing the state to enforce laws that should be obeyed, even though you may not always agree with them. If we do not like the laws implemented upon us, we can protest them, but this disqualifies the whole concept of a democratic state, because a state that is democratic would administer certain laws and its citizens would be obligated to obey them. What about a
History has been punctuated here and there by certain calls for action that allude to particular groups and their interests. These calls for action, which are conceptually called social movements, range from the seemingly vague and domestic to the radical and highly political. Social movements have covered everything from the personal, such as support groups for individuals dealing with addiction, to political movements that upset balances of power in a society, such as the Arab Spring. These points of dissent are due to the fact that politics is not just a discourse on power. More often than not, politics is also about taking into account the interests and demands of many individuals and groups in society and deciding how resources will be
Although some argued that inter-group conflict occurs naturally, there are also other causes that might spark the conflicts between groups. These causes can be taken from different aspects which is economically, institutionally and culturally. All these causes may also lead to prejudice and often would cause discrimination. The Realistic Group Conflict Theory further explains that the goals between different groups and its individuals causes conflicts because every group feels that they have the urge to compete with the other group to obtain the goal. Muzafer Sherif conducted an experiment on this which is remarkably
With the Articles of Confederation, one strength was that the power was spread out over the country. This lets all states help decide what’s best for the nation, instead of the central government have all the power. A weakness to this is that it might lead to a lack of unity within the United States. Another positive to this type of government is the ability for each state to have different laws. This allows each state to do what’s best for themselves.
He argues that a large republic would be using the idea of majority rules, but the ideas of the minority would still be taken into consideration. This also means that no one group could take over the government. He also argues that if it was a small democracy it would be easy for the candidates to fool the voters. If it was a large republic then it would be harder to fool voters. Madison believes that large republics are best able to avoid the dangers of faction.
Many believe that democracy allows people to be free from governmental influence within their lives. Federalism has helped to shape policing in the United States, ||is is often confused with democracy. With federalism power is divided among the government. The federal government creates laws for the whole nation, but federalism gives power to the states to make their own laws. State and federal government both have their own legal codes that they abide by.