Compare And Contrast Democratic Republicans Vs Federalists

1138 Words5 Pages

The political groups we see today, mainly the conservative and democratic parties, stem from Democratic-republicans and Federalists who have shaped the nation from the start. The creation of the federal government, which brought upon the bill of rights, lead to the creation of these factional groups and merit debates which discuss the liberties of the common people. Jefferson and Hamilton, both posed differing opinions and ideas which supported one region more than the other in some cases. Jefferson, on one hand, focused on the farmer’s rights and opposed the government from becoming too powerful. On the other hand, Hamilton focused on the government with the elite to support the masses of the changing people with an economy based on manufacturing. …show more content…

Jefferson, A political figure for the Democratic-republicans, had a clear bias in support of the farmers and held land in high regard. Jefferson’s implicit racism correlates with his absolute support for the system of slavery and the disapproval of the U.S. factory system. The Democratic-republican ideas wanted manufacturing to be reliant on England and wanted manufacturing to remain in England. Furthermore Jefferson states, “While we have land to labor then, Let us never wish to see our citizens occupied at a workbench, or twirling a distaff”. Jefferson shows his distaste for the idea of manufacturing and his emphasis on the investment of land. The ideal society of the Democratic-republicans excludes dependency with other regions and rather relies on countries, like England, for manufactured products. This idea also includes having the state government to implement their own banks, regulate immigration, and determine their own taxes. In conclusion, The Jeffersonian idea wanted to advance states’ rights and support the system of physical labor in the United …show more content…

The loss of control becomes the primary issue at hand. The federal government unable to regulate the social order among the working class may lead to mob action or even a revolution. A separation of wealth and ideas among regions dismisses the hope of an interconnected population and rather leads to the ideas of a secession. The reliance of specific foreign policies for finished goods irritated the Hamiltonians due to unpredictability of the foreign markets. Their beliefs focus on regulation of westward expansion and dread land ownership by rich farmers where it will just create higher need for physical labor. Additionally, land being construed into a religious obligation gave instability to the social liberty. In the response to industrializing without workers, Hamilton claims “first, the increased efficiency of machinery would enable it eventually to eventually replace human hands… ”. In his response, he relays the idea that machinery creates a greater use for land and is essentially better than physical labor. This industrial expansion created the workforce for women and children, a problem due to job scarcity in the pastoral economy. As factories become abundant in the job market, the increasing working class of unskilled and poor laborers became an ordeal to the Federalists. Government and social instability, and an unpredictable economy were the important insecurities of

Open Document