Whats better the original or the copy? Todays topic will be the classic cult film The Rocky Horror Picture Show. I will be directing both the original film and the adaptation and choosing which is best in my opinion. The films have many differences. Such as costumes, actors, and delivery. Both adaptations have amazing qualities. However, one is better than the other. The first difference I noticed between the films are the costumes. In the original the costumes were much darker and only had one color scheme. The main colors of this film were black, white, grey, yellow, and a small amount of red, black being the focal point. One of the most iconic characters costume (Dr. Frank N’ Furter) is a black and shimmery corset top with a black bikini bottom, fishnets and black platform heels. In the adaptation of the film, the color scheme was broadened. The color scheme includes some of the classic but this version includes pinks, grays, browns, and red is more of the focal point. In this adaptation Frank N’ Furter is dressed in a red bedazzled body suit, a red silk robe, and red boots. Another difference between films …show more content…
For example, the film has an iconic line. That line isTim Curry stating “ I see you shiver in antici……pation”. The pause between the word causes an unforgettable tension. In the adaptation Laverne Cox doesn't take that pause between the word causes that scene to have that missing tension that so many original film lovers anticipated. Another example is when Frank N’ Furter’s first creation Eddie comes into the film. In the original Eddie enters the film by escaping through a freezer that Frank N’ Furter has in his lab. This entrance, in the film answers questions about Frank N’ Furter and his experiments. In the adaptation, Eddie comes in through the window. This entrance not only defy gravity and physics but it also leaves the viewer with questions on how he is relevant to the
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
1. How do you think the new and old versions represent different aspects of their societies/times? What are the similarities and differences? For this assignment I reviewed the movies Emma and Clueless.
Mrs. Schumacher Film Appreciation Final Paper Footloose When watching both Footloose movies the 1984 and the 2011 version, there are quite a few noticeable differences. I would like to start out by saying that the biggest one is the character choice. In my opinion Kevin Bacon didn't play a very good Ren McCormick. I believe that Kenny Wormald plays a better Ren. In my opinion the more modern version of the movie is a lot more up beat.
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
It’s easy to pin point the difference but in reality they share common themes which includes life lessons. Despite the difference in the years and the actors both the classic and sequel has common themes that can be applied to situations now in day. When we compare and contrast
Yes, the basics of the plot are similar, but in the movie, there are changed details, mainly like missing scenes in the movie that the book originally had, or simplified events. In the movie, there was an additional girl character that was not in the book. The house Moon eventually came to at the end of the story was supposed to be a brick house. Some of the things the characters in the movie said were a bit different from what was said in the book. Things like that.
The last distinction I found was the age of Cindy Lu. In the book, the say that Cindy Lu was no more than two. But in the movie, she looks older than two. Cindy Lu has a bigger role in the movie than the book. I found many differences in the book and movie.
Dogs are a mans best friend. The book Where The Red Fern Grows is about a young boy named Billy as he goes on exciting adventures with his two dogs Old dan and Little ann. Billy never knew how much his dogs loved him until one night that something terrible happened. Old dan and Little ann are some of the most fine,loving,and smart hounds you’ll ever meet.
There are many movies and books that have tons of similarities and differences. I choosed A Series of Unfortunate Events, because of the nail biting moments that are in the book and movie. Plus,and you just want to know what happened. They both have many differences, but not many similarities. Some of the differences are very big changes and might make you like the other one more.
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
what was different in the story and movie was some of the characters. Like meg in the book she had frizzy hair, braces and glasses and in the movie she does not have frizzy hair, braces or glasses . For Charles Wallace he is 5 and not in school and in the movie he is 6 or 7 and in school. The setting for
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
Every Film Adaptation is Not Necessarily Faithful Throughout history, philosophers wrote thoughtful poems and sophisticated plays; plays sought to challenge the intellectual minds of those who would read them. Inevitably, as time progressed, people found ways to stage the plays for entertainment. When staging the play, whether it would be literal actors reciting lines on a stage or a movie with the reenactment of the play, the director always faces the problem of fidelity of the adaptation and how true their adaptation has to be to the original source. Fidelity in the terms of film refers to the authenticity and familiar similarities an adaptation has to its original source.
How well can a director put a book into action as a movie? After reading the book The Color Purple by Alice Walker and watching the movie The Color Purple directed by Steven Spielberg, I was given both sides of the story written and the screen write. Contrasting the two together personally is quite tricky because both the book and the movie were great to take part in. However some events in the book were obviously different when watching the movie.
The most prominent similarity was the fact that Liesel still adored to steal and read books. Without this trait, this would be an entirely different book. The two most salient differences between the book and movie were the fact that Max Vandenburg didn’t give Liesel and books and that Death didn’t give any, or almost any, comments and narrations. Without these, there are noticeable differences between the film adaptation and book. All in all, I prefered the book better.