ipl-logo

Similarities Between Explanation And Arguments

845 Words4 Pages

Everyone at some point in their lives uses explanation and argument. Explaining and arguing is a part of human nature and our natural instincts. Knowing what an explanation and an argument is and being able to tell the difference is a critical thinking skill which is vital to our daily lives. Having the knowledge and ability to make a good explanations or arguments is necessary. To start, the definition of explanation is a statement that makes something clear or a justification given for an action or belief. A part of an explanation is a blend of what is being clarified and the statements which are doing the clarification. Another part is having the informing statements be simple and not suspicious. When an explanation is done and delivered correctly, then it can clear up any issue that may present itself. Explanations can be used to explain …show more content…

Starting off with differences, according to Austin Cline (2015), “an explanation is not an argument. An argument is a series of statements designed to support or establish the truth of an idea, and an explanation is a series of statements designed to shed light on some event that is already accepted as a matter of fact.” By comparing both explanation and argument we can see many differences. An explanation is used to clarify a situation and involves causes or consequences. While an argument tries to persuade people of an idea and is made up of fact or evidence. Though, there are differences between them there are also similarities. A similarity is how an explanation and argument are presented is an effect on its effectiveness. Another is that an explanation and argument can help prove a point or get someone out of a problem. Also, both of them are very important to critical thinking skills which we use at some point in our lives. Explanation and argument are similar and different, but both

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Mode

    194 Words  | 1 Pages

    Analogous argument sets up a direct comparison between two things in order to prove a certain thesis. Abductive explanation uses its conclusion to explain its thesis. Authors may use cause and effect strategy to strengthen a claim by proving that there is a direct link between one thing and another.

    Read More

  • Counter Argument Toulmin Argument

    332 Words  | 2 Pages

    Introduction: Explain the idea to make sure the audience understands. Establish how you, personally, are to argue this point. Explain what you arguing. Explain what you will cover in the rest of your writing(thesis statement).

    Read More

  • Summary Of Toulmin Model Of Argumentation By Christopher M. Fairman

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Toulmin Model of Argumentation, Christopher M. Fairman has constructed a strong persuasive piece on the case against banning the word retard. The components of the Toulmin Model of Argumentation that will be evaluated to determine the degree to which the argument was successful are the claim, data, warrant, and backing. To begin a synopsis will be provided about the article. Fairman’s main argument of the article is that the word retard should not be banned due to the many negative repercussions of the action. He starts the article stating he would not be making the pledge at www.r-word.org to eliminate the word from his everyday speech.

    Read More

  • Bought The Farm Essay

    384 Words  | 2 Pages

    Post by Day 3, 1 to 2 paragraphs that address the following: Explain the meaning of the word or phrase in the described cultural context. Briefly describe the cultural context of the family, group, or community that uses the word or phrase. Explain the connection between the meaning and the culture. My phrase is "bought the farm."

    Read More

  • Fighting Words: Why Our Public Disclosure Must Change

    549 Words  | 3 Pages

    Despite how much you may dislike it or try to avoid it, arguing is a natural part of life. Most people would not think that arguing is a natural way of balancing things out, but it is. Although there isn’t necessarily a right way to argue, there are definitely wrong ways to argue, which will most likely lead to bigger problems than the original problem. Clearly, no one taught us how to argue, but just like we are influenced to do a lot of things in life, the way we disagree with one another and accept criticism is one. In today’s society, technology has played a major role in influencing the way we argue and disagree with one another.

    Read More

  • Everything's An Argument Analysis

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    If everything's an argument, then that means the whole book and title could be an argument. Everything, indeed, is an argument. Before I opened this chubby book, I doubted the title. I thought: “How can everything be an argument? That would mean our days would be spent constantly arguing--mentally or verbally.”

    Read More

  • Rogerian Argument Vs Traditional Argument

    122 Words  | 1 Pages

    Traditional argument assumes that people are most readily convinced or persuaded by a confrontation “debate”. This form of argument is mostly used in essays or critical analysis. In a traditional argument, even though the writes argues reasonably and fairly, the writer provides evidence to support or back up their claim, the argument becomes kind of a struggle of “war”. Unlike the traditional argument, the Rogerian argument does not take the confrontation stance; it uses logic to solve problems by establishing a common ground with the opposition. If people are with each other, they need to be willing to change their views and identify where they can adjust their beliefs.

    Read More

  • Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

    1444 Words  | 6 Pages

    However, one of the arguments is superior ant that is the ontological argument. The Ontological argument is the stronger of the two due to the fact that it is based in pure logic and reasoning. The major premise of the Ontological argument is about what God is. In the Abrahamic tradition God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent.

    Read More

  • Three Elements Of Ethos Pathos Logos

    127 Words  | 1 Pages

    Deductive gives audience general proposition, then draw a specific truth. The Rogerian Argument is more of a mediation approach, identifying the conflict, and finding common ground to create a solution. The Toulmin Model base argument on qualifiers and rebuttal. This argument approach is not to push absolutes, but to lead the reader to a realistic

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Aging Out In Foster Care

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    In my own words the difference is rhetorical reasoning is deceiving like the author will makes you understand something and mean another while fallacy is less convincing because the reasoning is completely wrong Issue: Aging out in foster care Rhetorical appeal: Logos (Inductive reasoning): In 2012 there was 23,439 children that age out in foster care system and about 71% of young women are believed to get pregnant by age 21according to jimcaseyyouth.org that’s the reason why the statistic of children in foster care system keeps increasing. Logical fallacy: Either/or (This is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices): To control the rise of number of kids in foster care we need to give free birth control or let the number goes up.

    Read More

  • English 1302 Reflection

    600 Words  | 3 Pages

    He explained that when arguing it is not just presenting your opinions and refusing other people’s stances, it is a matter of listening to other aspects of the argument and

    Read More

  • Deductive Reasoning In Reasoning

    1257 Words  | 6 Pages

    A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.

    Read More

  • The Assault On Reason Analysis

    847 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Al Gore’s “The Assault on Reason,” many topics are presented to get his argument across. Gore’s thesis is not fully revealed in the essay, but one can infer it is about the people needing to wake up and realize what is happening. He wants people to ask questions, get reasoning, be a fully informed citizen. For example, Gore states "More and more people are trying to figure out what has gone wrong with our democracy, and how we can fix it." (Gore 9)

    Read More

  • Kenneth Burke's Unending Conversation

    1096 Words  | 5 Pages

    Before giving our opinion we need to do academic reading to have evidence to support our argument and opinion. Just as in the conversation we need to analyze what the argument was about before actually giving our

    Read More

  • Inductivism Vs Falsification Theory

    1172 Words  | 5 Pages

    In inductivism, a finite number of specific facts leads to a general conclusion. In falsificationism, definite claims about the world make a law or a theory falsifiable. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better, but not yet being falsified. For falsificationism scientific progress is possible via trial and error. While inductivism is applied to mathematics for instance where generalization is more possible, falsificationism is really common in biology, physics or social sciences, where there is not a general pattern, but many exceptions to the laws or theories.

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Explanation And Arguments

Open Document