ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

957 Words4 Pages

Both federalists presidents, George Washington and John Adams demonstrated a great extent of promoting Unity of the Nation and the authority of the federal government throughout the time period of 1789-1798 by enforcing new laws, having control of the miltras. After the American Revolution in 1783, although the United States of America was formed, many states remained divided and believing they are better than one another. Thus lead to the form of the Constitution and the formation of the Federal government. This frighten many citizens like Thomas Jefferson, an Anti Federalists, because the idea of central government might turn their way of government back to a monarchy. When Washington gave his first Inaugural address in 1790, his purpose …show more content…

As government began to gain more power and authority they began to start violating the citizens very own rights in order to gain more power. The Alien and Sedition act explained that no one can criticize the government which completely go against the 1st amendment of the bill of rights of free speech and press. This violation goes back to the John Peter Zenger’s trial during the colonial period, where the British violated the colonists rights. The citizens,intended audiences, is shocked by this because, after they have separated from the oppressing British, they are once again having their rights being violated. This led the citizens to believe that the federal government have too much power. ( document G) This led to many debates and cause hatred to the federal government. This led to the state of Kentucky to draft the Kentucky resolutions to say that the Alien and Sedition act to be unconstitutional. The purpose of the Kentucky resolution was basically to express the hatred towards the federalists and also to protest against the Sedition act. They believe it go against the 1st amendment, thus citizens do not have to follow because it goes against our rights. From the Kentucky resolutions, it allows one to tell that the Federal government is starting to obtain too much power and they will have to start to contain it. (document H) A great source that would be able to support this statement would be the XYZ affair because it will show how much power Adams have and how he was unwilling to compromise with the French without even informing Congress or the house of representatives or the Senate

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    156 Words  | 1 Pages

    Anti-Federalists in the late 1780s strongly objected to the amount of authority given to the government by the constitution, and had an unorganized but large effort to prevent its ratification. The Anti-Federalists believed that liberty could only be upheld if the federal government remained small and uninvolved with local matters in the states. Congress, with the power to make laws deemed necessary and proper, has no firm limitations under the constitution. Anti-Federalists thought that each state should control itself, with minimal interference by Congress or the national government. The purpose of becoming independent of England was because the King was not sympathetic to struggles in the Americas, and under this new constitution, the executive

    Read More

  • What Were The Goals Of The Federalist Papers: Taxation

    946 Words  | 4 Pages

    It involved "nothing less than the existence of the UNION . . . the fate of an empire, in many respects, the most interesting in the world. "(Hamilton, Federalist papers #1) A wrong decision in this matter would "deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. "(Hamilton, Federalist paper #1) Expecting criticism

    Read More

  • What Is The Federalist Paper No. 51 For A Strong Central Government

    876 Words  | 4 Pages

    causes could not be removed7. Alexander Hamilton advocated in Federalist Paper No. 51 for a strong central government with a system of checks and balances; “several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places”8. Hamilton and Madison specifically tried to prevent a revolution, like theirs toward Britain, from happening in America by proposing a strong democratic republic that could operate in concert with state governments and maintain a certain level of autonomy over the states and the nation as a whole. Federalist Papers No. 6-9 spoke to the importance of a strong union, as well as the discord a separation of states might have caused9.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    199 Words  | 1 Pages

    Like any political thought sometimes it will agree with other and by other times disagreed just how the Federalist and Anti-Federalist happen to proceeded . However we can say that from both ways on the balance they would both provide compromise and at the end come together . To start with the Federalist Party that was lead by James Madison and happen to be in favor of the formed Constitution, which ideal point was to provide security to the union along with a variety of states that could encourage arise as a piece to the union. Madison would see the new republican form of government more enriched in Constitution due to all the overcome it could provide to the unions . Improvements such as in the infrastructure side of union taking all the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    339 Words  | 2 Pages

    Question 3: “Federalist or Antifederalist? Pick one (or neither) and then defend your position.” Answer: After the passage of the Constitution in 1787, a fierce debate erupted between those who support a strong, national government, known as the Federalists, and those who opposed the creation of a central government that would have more power than the states, known as the Anti-Federalists. I chose the Federalist, and here’s why: In the Anti-Federalist view, the creation of a strong, national government would seem unreasonable.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Federalists

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    The document consisted of acts/ laws that if violated citizens would have suffered consequences. For example, the document proclaimed that if, “any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States” (Sedition Act), would have been convicted, punished, and imprisoned. Our fellow opponents, the Republicans, stated that with this law, we are eliminating freedom of speech and press from the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. That was quite incorrect. This was a necessary precaution of the prosperity and stability of the nation.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    168 Words  | 1 Pages

    While the Federalists dominated the government through the 1790s, they rapidly declined after 1800. Thomas Jefferson's election to the presidency was bolstered by Republican victories in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federalists remained powerful enough to obstruct certain Republican measures for about a decade, but they were not strong enough to prevent the United States from going to war against Britain in 1812, a war which the Federalists vehemently opposed (Shmoop, n.d.) In US history at 1787 until 1788, there were federalist and anti-federalist. Federalist wanted a stronger national government and the ratification of the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    138 Words  | 1 Pages

    Another reason for this belief was people didn't have guaranteed rights. In conclusion this belief among others led to the Anti Federalists fighting against the constitution. The Federalists and Anti Federalists thoughts on the bill of rights like everything else was different. The Federalists believed that the bill of rights was useless. Anti-Federalists thought it was essential to making sure that peoples rights were kept safe.

    Read More

  • Alien And Sedition Act Essay

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    In, 1798, the Alien and Sedition Act went into place. The Alien part of the Act is for non-citizens, America has the right to export them if they slander the government while the Sedition Act is for current citizens, citizens could be punished by fine or imprisonment for criticism of America. I think this Act is a smart idea because no one should know all the information about the government, word spreads like wild fire and could end up in the wrong ears. If we allowed citizens to criticize the government how they please, other countries could get a hold of that information, use it to their advantage and harm the United States. I am going to have to be a Federalist on this issue.

    Read More

  • The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

    247 Words  | 1 Pages

    We gained two important pieces of American history from the discourse between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalists. First we gained a more balanced Constitution with the addition of the Bill of Rights. Second being the Federalist Papers. The federalist papers are a collection of 85 articles and essays written. These papers explained the Constitution and its meaning to many who were not informed.

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Anti Federalists

    1093 Words  | 5 Pages

    The opposing viewpoints of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created lengthy debates on how the newly found country would run the government and what rules would be considered the supreme law of the land. The anti-federalists thought the government held too much power and wanted the inclusion of the Bill of Rights (Young, slide 30). Patrick Henry, one of the most ardent anti-federalist, advocated extensively for the inclusion of the bill of rights (Young, “Found Fathers…”). Henry constantly voiced his discontent with the constitution and questioned aloud why the inclusion of the Bill of Rights were not added. As the delegate of Virginia, he led the people of Virginia to reject the ratification of the constitution and promised them that by his efforts and their rejection that the Bill of Rights would be included (Young, “Found Fathers…”).

    Read More

  • The Federalists Party

    1696 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lastly the Sedition Act restricted free speech among the people which violated people’s protection granted under the first amendment of the constitution. However during this time the practice of the Judicial Review was still in its early stages and therefore not always effective. These acts were ultimately what helped the democrats defeat the Federalists during the election of 1800. The Sedition Act was allowed to expire in 1800 and the Alien Friends Act in 1801. Thomas Jefferson ended up

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    586 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists and Anti-Federalists The Federalists were the people who supported and proposed the U.S. Constitution. They had a wish of a stronger national government and were in favor to ratify the U.S. Constitution to manage debt and pressure following the American Revolution. Most of the Federalists lived in the metropolitan areas. The Federalists wanted the government to help regulate the economy because the majority of them dominate big business and arts. They supported the central banking and central financial policies.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson First Inaugural Address Analysis

    1808 Words  | 8 Pages

    Summaries: First Inaugural Address As Jefferson takes office he hopes to bring peace with other nations while also advancing American civilization. He acknowledges the brutal nature of the election of 1800. This shows he is aware of its importance for history.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

Open Document