Carter Gilliam
Rubendall
Period 6
17th February 2023
Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans
In the late 1700s two political parties were being born, one was the Federalists and the other democratic republicans. Each party had different political figures that led them to the Federalist leaders Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and John Adams. The democratic-republican leaders were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Many of the supporters of each party came from a certain region of the U.S. mainly federalist supporters were from the north while democratic republicans were from the south. I would vote for the Democratic republicans because Thomas Jefferson wanted to lower the voting qualification so common people could vote, also he had a very strict interpretation of the Constitution and he supported the freedom of speech and press.
The first reason I would vote for the democratic republicans is that Thomas Jefferson wanted common people to be involved in the government. I liked this because he wanted to lower the voting qualifications. The federalists didn’t feel the same way Hamilton thought that common people were ignorant and incapable of self-government. Hamilton wanted the rich to run the government because he thought they would have more knowledge. I think this
…show more content…
He believed that the government could only do what the constitution said it could do. Hamilton on the other hand thought that the government has implied powers, powers which are not listed in the constitution. For example, Hamilton wanted a national bank but nowhere in the constitution did it say that you could do that. But Hamilton thought that the constitution gave them implied powers to let them create one. I think a strict interpretation is important because it won’t let the government make up some dumb rule or something that wasn’t in the
The federalist dominated the national government through the end of the 18th century. The Republican party emerged as organized opposition to the Federalist policies. It is said that Washington appointed both men to his side because of their opposing
Alexander Hamilton was a federalist at the time, and he set out to expand the national government power. This would allow states “to retain their rights and individuality”. But hamilton didn’t think of his version of government without inspiration from the British. He believed that it was the best form of government at the time, “consisted of a strong monarch, an assembly of aristocrats called the House of Lords, and another assembly of commoners called the House of Commons.” This system allowed the people to participate in government via representation in Parliament.
Hamilton thought that we should have an economy where it is business-based and was full of cities. He wanted to use the government’s powers to promote business, manufacturing, and trade. His goal was to build lots of cities so more immigrants would want to move to the U.S. Also, Hamilton wanted to establish a national bank as well as a national currency. That way they didn’t have to go through what France went through in the French Revolution just because someone liked spending money.
Jefferson not only disagreed and opposed Hamilton's(Federalists) ideologies, but had completely different viewpoint of the government. He wanted America to be predominantly agrarian, opposed international trade and manufacturing, and distrusted concentrated power in the privilege. In other words Jefferson wanted a small-scale local economy that would be best served by a small scale local government. In addition, Jefferson wanted strong ties with France, for he spent time there as an ambassador, and appreciated French’s help in the revolutionary war. Unlike Hamilton, Jefferson wanted more Democracy.
Majority of the disagreements were how to drive the economy, the division of power between federal and state governments, interpretation of the constitution, and the foreign policy, which made Hamilton and Jefferson couldn’t agree and unite each other. Therefore, the supporters of Jefferson became Democratic Republicans, and supporters of Hamilton became
a) The government would also represent the people along with the point that states couldn’t infringe on individual’s right to land. b) Hamilton was in support of the idea that a president and Senate should serve life terms. c) Many people wanted to find a middle ground between
To compare and contrast the differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-republicans? Is by the federalists and the democratic-republicans both have people that put rules down too Rule by the wealthy class and Rule by the people but they are a different type of people like the wealthy class and the normal people. Another compare things they both have is that they both have strong governments but Alexander and Thomas had different governments like Alexander had a strong federal government and Thomas had a strong state government. Also, Alexander and Thomas had an alliance but with different people like Alexander had an alliance with British and Thomas had an alliance with the French. But an overall, they both had banks but, they both
Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist which means that he supported the Constitution and what it had to say. He believed that the new America needed a strong, central government and a lot of order and less liberty to keep people from following their vicious passions. The strong central government would be having a president, and one bicameral legislature for the whole country. He did not trust that the people will do the right thing if they are given a ton of liberty. He said, “Take mankind as they are and what are they governed by?
In the upcoming US presidential election of 1800, John Adams, a member of the Federalist party, is running for reelection against Thomas Jefferson, a member of the Democratic-Republican party. John Adams favors a strong national power and limited state power. He believes that common people are incapable of governing themselves and is against too much individual freedom. The people who support him are high class citizens such as bankers, manufacturers, and merchants. On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson favors a weak national government and believes that the people are capable of ruling themselves.
Hamilton also had a vision for America to be a highly commercial and industrial nation, and one without slavery. However, Jefferson had a vision of a nation focused on farming and nature. He and many others again argued that this would make the government too powerful. I don’t think that Hamilton’s proposals would make the government too powerful. I agree with Hamilton’s way of viewing the Constitution.
Jefferson's democratic-republican party views are always contradictory to the Federalist party founded by Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson believes in small federal government and more powers to individual states, his policies are around people and they should rule the government. Jefferson always follows strict constitutional rules. Jefferson always believed the country economy will improve through the agriculture. Hamilton views are very contrasted to Jefferson's view.
In the article Martin explains “[t]hat current stressed the need for a capable, energetic government, led by wise guides chosen by the people. ”(24) He also believed that the people already look to those more educated than themselves for guidance, and that applying that pre existing system to the government would be the most beneficial to the people. Hamilton also believed that if the government did get out of hand that the educated people outside of office would urge the people to act against the government or take up arms- just like in the Revolutionary war. Although I don’t believe that only rich old white male lawyers should lead our government, I do see the sense in employing people who have an adequate knowledge of politics, and the American’s needs.
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist During the building of America’s government identity in the 1780s, the colonies were politically divided between two parties; the federalists and the anti-federalists. Typically the lower class, anti-federalists generally pushed for stronger state power. However, the wealthy and propertied class, the federalists, pushed for gains through a stronger national unity. The opposing groups worked hand-in-hand in creating the structural framework of the United States of America.
In the 1790s, there were two men who had different beliefs regarding how the United States should function. The two men were Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson was the leader of the Republican party and Hamilton was the leader of the Federalist party. The political parties were created by Hamilton and Jefferson based on their differences in opinion on how the country should run. For example, Jefferson believed that the government should be self-governed and all of the power should go to the individual states.
The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most