"Freedom on the Wallaby" is a ballad written by Australian poet Henry Lawson in 1891 after the Australian Shearers’ Strike in 1891, while "Federation" is a poem written by Eileen, a woman in Australia in 1900 (a year before the Australian Federation), who published this poem in The Sydney Morning Herald. Both poems portray the beauty of freedom from a first-person perspective. Nonetheless, "Freedom on the Wallaby" is a ballad about fighting for freedom, whereas "Federation" is an ode about the freedom that will come. The two poems, "Federation" and "Freedom on the Wallaby", are structurally different. "Federation" uses an iambic pattern of rhythm, while "Freedom on the Wallaby" does not, as it attempts to break through from the traditional rhythmic patterns of poetry and fulfils its form of being rebellious and free. Nonetheless, both poems distribute lines according to stanzas, where “Federation” is distributed into 8 stanzas with each stanza consisting of 4 lines per stanza, while “Freedom on the Wallaby” is distributed into 5 stanzas consisting of 8 lines per stanza. Both poems also have certain rhyming schemes such as ABCB in “Federation” and ABCBDEFE for most stanzas in “Freedom on the Wallaby”, as they were written to effectively deliver the writers' …show more content…
"Freedom on the Wallaby" uses colloquialism, which is the use of informal language as seen in lines such as “An’ Freedom’s humping bluey” (line 2) to deliver a sense of Australian pride by using a typical Australian vernacular instead of formal British English. In opposition, "Federation" uses archaic vocabulary such as "thee" as "you" (line 5), "thy" as "your” (line 17), and "thine" as "our" (line 15) to relate to the delicate Shakespearean poems as a representation of highly educated literature. These poetic devices target the main audience and consistently deliver the writer’s idea throughout the
Primary source: The Australian Worker, October 26, 1916 “For Australia’s Sake” On the 26th of October, 1916, The Australian Worker published a piece entitled “For Australia’s Sake”. The title of the paper itself is an indication of their intended target audience, the Australian Worker; its sub headline is “The Australian Paper for Australian Homes”. This gives the reader an indication of the political standing of the paper, it is clearly a Labor-oriented newspaper, and thus the document should be read as a piece of Labor party propaganda. Written by Henry E. Boote, a Labor propagandist, the document appears to be an article (arguably an advertisement) on the front page of the newspaper.
The first government in the U.S. was called the Articles of Confederation. It was the first set of laws after the states became independent. The laws in the Confederation were very weak, and they all contracted each other. It also had a weak central/national government because the states didn’t want to give it too much power like the monarchy with the British. Some weaknesses in the first government were that each state no matter how big or small had only one vote, each state could coin its own money, making it hard to move, and lastly, they could not have a military so it would be hard to fight armed rebellions or militias.
Y. O’Connor, responsible for the development of the Goldfields Water Supply Scheme, a landmark feat of engineering that brought O’Connor and Western Australia global recognition. Robert Drewe’s characterisation of O’Connor strongly reinforces the dominant assumptions regarding what it means to be Australian, despite his own non-Australian heritage. O’Connor is shown to act in a way which is typical of the stereotypical Australian “bogan.” He uses informal Australian vernacular, such as when he exclaims to the protagonist, William Dance, that his pet parrot is a “bloody budgerigar,” and uses idioms such as “buttering up” a person. O’Connor’s way of speaking reinforces the dominant assumption that Australians speak with aggressive vernacular and slang terms.
Australia became an independent nation in 1901 when the British Parliament passed legislation, giving us the right to govern ourselves. We stood up for ourselves and became more independent. 1914 brings the start of World War One. They went into battle with the characteristics formed by the founders of our nation, the bravery, mate ship, determination and honour coursing through their veins. The approximately 52,280 people that came back from the war continued to live the now labelled ‘ANZAC Spirit’, teaching their children and grandchildren to live life with courage and integrity. Even while the war was on, the women lived the spirit in Australia by stepping up and doing work the men usually did as well as the normal female tasks.
Scott Sawyer’s opinion piece published in the Gladstone Observer on the 25th of January 2014, employs an informal tone to argue against the unnecessary racism often exhibited on Australia Day. The piece follows a train of thought as it transitions from an impartial positive tone to stern and disgusted. The article “Ditch the racism and enjoy Australia Day as it should be” states it’s contention in it’s title, clearly and concisely, continuing on to position the Australian population to agree to it’s contention using rhetorical questions, emotive and inclusive language and appeal to patriotism. The article displays a cartoon image of a cave man looking puzzled at a stone wheel, contemplating its existence and use. The image acts as a metaphor
To compare and contrast the differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-republicans? Is by the federalists and the democratic-republicans both have people that put rules down too Rule by the wealthy class and Rule by the people but they are a different type of people like the wealthy class and the normal people. Another compare things they both have is that they both have strong governments but Alexander and Thomas had different governments like Alexander had a strong federal government and Thomas had a strong state government. Also, Alexander and Thomas had an alliance but with different people like Alexander had an alliance with British and Thomas had an alliance with the French. But an overall, they both had banks but, they both
George Washington was on the “front lead” of the American Revolution, and it is no surprise he would become the first president of the United States. He ruled in a blank slated government, since there was no precedents of a government detached from the British. During his mandate The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were created. While the new government was trying to settle, two groups of people were also starting to be distinguished: The Federalists and the Republicans. George Washington’s vice-president, John Adams (who would succeed him) was a Federalist.
Around this era of the late 1700’s, the citizens of the newly independent nation of “America” were in the process of ratifying their government from the Articles of Confederation to the current Constitution which allowed for a democratic republic. The people in support of this ratification were the “Federalist” whom often used pamphlet writings known as the “Federalist Papers” to persuade and inform the public of their ideas and Constitution ratification. The most influential paper among the 85, is the Federalist paper #10 that disproves the Antifederalists’ argument that a republic of any kind would fall from the pressure of multiple divisive opinions among its citizens. Given the nature of humans by God, creating factions based on similar
This had to do with battle cries and freedom songs during the civil war between the years 1861 to 1865. The Union and Confederacy comes in place and it is known that slavery was the primary source of the civil war. (Goldberg, ed., The American Journey, 417).
he Anti-Federalists were centered around two fundamental things; making an oppressive government and absence of individual power on the off chance that the focal government turned out to be all the more intense (Kaminski et al 3). They held the conviction that the Constitution gave the focal government a great deal of forces through the lawmaking body, legal and official. They were of the contention that, much the same as King George III, the official would be onerous to the general population as opposed to ensuring their individual rights. In supporting their claim, the counter Federalists contended that Americans had been included in a grisly and exceedingly expensive progressive clash to wind up free from British run the show. Setting themselves in a place like that of an unregulated government would not be valuable to the eventual fate of the country.
The framers of the Constitution established a federal form of government to provide for a central government which could overcome the failures of the Articles of Confederation. This new federal government lets states retain many of their powers, while simultaneously creating a strong central government, thus essentially creating two governments which run side by side: the state governments and the federal government. The need for a divided government was validated by the armed uprising known as Shay’s Rebellion. After the Revolutionary War, America’s economy was all but destroyed, and many veterans who fought in the war came home to massive debts and crushing economic policies.
The rebellion is looked upon today as a milestone in Australian history as it was apart of the struggle for democratic tights. It is also seen as a symbol of resistance. The Eureka Rebellion was the section in the Gold Rush when the miners had enough of the government’s laws and rebelled. This was seen as a turning point in Australian History. The miners recited this quote at the Eureka Stockade, “We swear by the Southern Cross to stand truly by each other and fight to defend our rights and liberties.”
On March 23, 1775, “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” was heard all throughout St. John 's Church. These famous words were not only a great speaker looking to have his voice heard, but they would have an everlasting impact on young English students studying the use of ethos, logos, and pathos. Patrick Henry also used figurative languages such as allusions, parallelism, and biblical references to bring his speech to life. In this specific piece of literature, qualities like independence and individualism are exceedingly prominent, this all being due to Henry’s use of literary devices. Conversely, in the very first sentence, Henry uses ethos to articulate how he is patriotic to his home, but he occupies diverse views than his audience, the Virginia
An Australian Republic is about us — not the Queen, not Prince Charles or the world economy. We should do it now, without delay. As Nelson Mandela once said, “ For to be free is not merely to cast off one 's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” Until we break our last Constitutional links to the mother country, our nationhood is incomplete. Now after just over 115 years of Federation, Australia must finally join the world of nations as a full equal, unshackled to any other nation.
The soft alliteration portrays how peaceful freedom is, “the wind stirs soft through the springing grass.” To be freed from the cage and being able to experience the world, the feeling of liberation, that's what freedom feels like. The bird started with freedom but ended up being caged. Freedom did not last long for the bird. In the first and last line of the stanza its creates a cage by repeating, “I know what the caged bird feels.”