Grant and Lee It all began in April 1865. Two of the greatest Americans decided to meet, and wrestle the thought of what needed to be done to end the Civil War. Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee had important similarities, but also had differences. Both men had superior characteristics that helped them make the decisions they did during the Civil War. General Ulysses S. Grant was a very powerful man. He was the son of a tanner on the Western frontier. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was very modern, and thought you had to work hard no matter what. Grant was a man that did not live in the past. He had an eye for what the future would bring. Grant was very self- reliant which refers back to how modern he was. Grant believed in Democracy which meant every man is for himself. Grant also believed in equality. General …show more content…
General Robert E. Lee was an aristocrat. Unlike Grant, Lee was from Virginia and was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Lee was born into wealth. He liked property and rich people. Lee considered himself a relation to his region. Unlike Grant, General Lee did not believe in equality. He had leadership from the upper-class. He was such an inspiration to his men that they would die for him on the battlefield. Lee cared more about Virginia rather than a united states. Lee also believed that everything you fight for meant to defend everything in life to the deepest meaning. General Lee chose to surrender to General Grant. Even though he surrendered, he was still a great general and leader. After all, both General Grant and General Lee were very good examples of what it meant to be superior leaders. They both fought hard, and led very appropriately. Both men symbolized characteristics of what it meant to be a good human leader. Even though both men were divergent in many ways, they held more similarities than we
After a series of correspondence between General Ulysses S Grant and Robert E Lee, they agreed to meet On April 9th, 1865, both Grant and Lee met at the Appomattox Court House to discuss the terms of surrender Grant and Lee remembered each other from the Mexican - American war Around four in the afternoon, General Lee officially surrendered Upon the surrender, General Grant allowed the Confederate soldiers to retain some freedoms He allowed them to keep their sidearms, horses, and other items He also allowed them to return to their homes under probation News of the surrender took time to travel to the rest of the Confederate soldiers
General Ulysses S. Grant had a great impact on the United States both in his time as a war general and in his time as president. His role in the Civil War was instrumental to the Union victory and the strategies he employed saved many union troops and ended the war quickly. He had many wins, but also many losses and setbacks that were devastating. He learned and adapted through those setbacks and won the war and the American public. The United States would have had a much harder time winning the war and with recovery efforts afterward were it not for General Grant.
Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee. According to Bruce Catton, they were two powerful men who survived from the civil war in 1856. Lee was from Virginia, he was of an old age of chivalry. He believed there should be an “inequality within Americas social Structure;” he had a sense of entitlement obligation to community, he was an aristocratic south, he believed in what the culture and tradition of his country; The other General, Ulysses S. Grant, aspired for America that were the opposite
Bryan Servin 23, November 2015 History 1301 Panola Community College professor Bill Offer Greatest Civil War General There has been a lot of controversy about whether Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant was the better general. They were both really great generals. Abraham Lincoln wanted Robert E. Lee to command his army but he declined because his home state of Virginia seceded from the Union.
General Lee always knew what was best for his troops also. He knew how to blend his troops needs and his needs to win the war perfectly. This mix of being able to satisfy his troops and his needs to win the war for the south was a perfect concoction to victory. General Robert E. Lee was also a faith man. He completely loved God and nothing could ever change that.
Ulysses S. Grant commanded the victorious Union during the Civil War in 1861-1865. He was a national hero after the civil war. Main focus was the Reconstruction for the North and South and he wanted to reconcile the both sides while also attempting to protect civil rights of newly freed Black slaves. While in office he did not recognize fast that his associates were corrupted.
The Civil War is known as one of the most destructive wars of the time with a total casualty rate of about 625,000 soldiers.1 The non-slave owning states, the Union, and the slave owning states, the Confederates, fought each other for power over the national government which would be the deciding factor in whether the upcoming states would or would not be slave states. Each side had its own prominent general, Robert E. Lee of the Confederacy and Ulysses S. Grant of the Union. Many people in America today often have their opinions on who they think was the better of the two so, I’m going to ask you. Who do you think was the greatest general of the American Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant, or Robert E. Lee?
General Lee chose to fight and his attempts were thwarted and he was then forced to surrender his army. Without the acts of General Custer, the Union victory at the Appomattox would not have been possible (“Battles of
There are few men who, even in defeat, have their names remembered and revered for centuries. Robert Edward Lee was one such man. Hundreds of years after his life and death have passed, Americans still widely regard him as one of America’s greatest generals. He is well-deserved of this title. Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, said that Lee was the finest general “...the English-speaking peoples have brought forth” (Horn).
“Boom, pow” you hear as a bullet whirl right past you almost striking your heart, your men jaunt among you, with friends and family you know and love. It is your fault and your duty if they die, you can be a hero, a coward, or a man slaughterer. This was the everyday life of General Robert E Lee, he was almost always in the life of battle, this gentleman was a gutsy leader and an extraordinary man. Lee has sacrificed his daily life for his wife and his country, he contributed to amazing jousting techniques, many say he is one of the best generals in the world. People say that he is a bad man just because he fought for the south, but he argues that he does not have any regard in the method of slavery, but he could not let his home down.
“They were all privileged in their own right.” (394). Lee embodied a way to life that men “with money” had equal rights and a chance in the world. He assorted to the fact that all men were alike and the chance that were given to them should be equal for all. General Ulysses S. Grant was born into the frontier life.
Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
He never received a single demerit in his four years there. This training shaped him into the great leader he became. Robert E. Lee is considered to be one of the best Generals in America’s history. Lee was a General for the Confederate
I would agree with both characters in certain ways since each captain showed different aspects that made themselves unique. Grant, for example, was a great soldier that only care about the future of the nation. On the other hand, Lee was the image everybody wanted to follow. His personality was higher than Grant’s, and his desire of keeping the old aristocratic mentality was the nation’s example of loyalty. But, they both had the same purpose which is keeping the American nation as one united country.