Compare And Contrast Grant And Lee

408 Words2 Pages
Grant and Lee It all began in April 1865. Two of the greatest Americans decided to meet, and wrestle the thought of what needed to be done to end the Civil War. Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee had important similarities, but also had differences. Both men had superior characteristics that helped them make the decisions they did during the Civil War. General Ulysses S. Grant was a very powerful man. He was the son of a tanner on the Western frontier. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He was very modern, and thought you had to work hard no matter what. Grant was a man that did not live in the past. He had an eye for what the future would bring. Grant was very self- reliant which refers back to how modern he was. Grant believed in Democracy which meant every man is for himself. Grant also believed in equality. General…show more content…
General Robert E. Lee was an aristocrat. Unlike Grant, Lee was from Virginia and was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Lee was born into wealth. He liked property and rich people. Lee considered himself a relation to his region. Unlike Grant, General Lee did not believe in equality. He had leadership from the upper-class. He was such an inspiration to his men that they would die for him on the battlefield. Lee cared more about Virginia rather than a united states. Lee also believed that everything you fight for meant to defend everything in life to the deepest meaning. General Lee chose to surrender to General Grant. Even though he surrendered, he was still a great general and leader. After all, both General Grant and General Lee were very good examples of what it meant to be superior leaders. They both fought hard, and led very appropriately. Both men symbolized characteristics of what it meant to be a good human leader. Even though both men were divergent in many ways, they held more similarities than we

More about Compare And Contrast Grant And Lee

Open Document