The two movies, “Guess Who's Coming to Dinner” and “Selma” are outstanding in their own perspective. The movie “Guess Who's Coming to Dinner” was based on a woman, Joanna Drayton, an extroverted woman and a man, John Prentice, a black doctor become engaged in a time period, 1960s, where civil right movement was at peak and racial equality was a national topic with different personal views and ideas about the situation. On the other hand, “Selma” depicts the movement to secure equal voting rights by Martin Luther King Jr. through his march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965. Even though both movies were exemplifying the same time period of 1960s, they have a different method in filmmaking. In common terms, the movies that are released in the past decade has been more concentrated toward digital processing and editing however the movie made in 1960s had seldom reach to digital editing and processing. Another difference we can …show more content…
There are strongly four elements in every movie; narrative, cinematography, editing and sounds. The narrative in both movies had the actual use of word that were prevalent in the 1960s such as the use of the word “cool” in “Guess Who's Coming to Dinner”. The narrative in “Selma” were as subtle as the movie. The cinematography was different as they were filmed in different times. Through the differences, the both movie showed how the racial oppression was present at that time and how people were having a hard time in accepting another race and culture. Both movie can play a significant part as a tool of historical learning. “Guess Who's Coming to Dinner” gave us a context on the state of Interracial Marriage at that time, how social status played a vital role and the civic right movement efforts. “Selma” on the other hand showed us the efforts and the drive the nation and Martin Luther King Jr. had to ensure the voting
The movie that I choose to watch was Fences (2016). Throughout the movie discursive rhetoric is used a lot to show racism back in the 1950's. Troy is mostly talking with others about how inequality is occurring around them and how racism played a role in the job opportunities that blacks had or did not have. Black men were not allowed to drive the dumpster trucks. I feel that this movie hinderd me a little it could have improved by showing the interaction between the whites and black, instead of just hearing the characters talk about it.
People of all races and religious backgrounds joined forces. Race Relations Selma, would not be a movie about race, if there was scenes about race relations.
The To Kill a Mockingbird movie and book, both have different ways to portray important key events from their plot. The movie showed specific details on the settings and also the character attire which really brought the movie together and since in the book we can't really see the story happen its gives us details on all the settings, characters, and the plot. Both show us details but have different ways of showing it. The book and movie had similar ways to show the story and also carrying it out in a manner so that it could be understood . Likewise, knowing whether the book or movie had more differences or similarities depends on how the plot is shown/carried out, the setting and the characters.
Selma: Fact or Fiction? Some say Selma is an excellent historical film that brings the atrocities of the 1960s with the Black Voting Rights Movement to the big screen, while others retort that the film is a sad imitation of the truth, and the film was created solely to generate a large revenue in the box office. While the causal moviegoer will probably enjoy the movie for its theatrical achievements, as one dwells deeper into the facts and fiction of the film one realizes that while Selma is an entertaining film, it is riddled with inaccuracies. The film falsely portrays the relationship between President Johnson and Dr. King as argumentative.
The Scottsboro Trials and To Kill a Mockingbird In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, the famous father named Atticus says “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view… until you climb into his skin and walk around in it (Judith 2). This quote is said during a time of intense racism. “Not long after Obama took office, the National Urban League released its 2009 State of Black America report. The findings showed that racial inequities continued in employment, housing, health care, education, criminal justice, and other areas” (Buckley 1). This essay will primarily focus on the criminal justice area of this when discussing the Scottsboro trials and comparing the trials to the famous novel To Kill a Mockingbird.
To Kill A Mockingbird Comparative Essay To Kill A Mockingbird was published in 1960, immediately grabbing the public by the ear and showing them the dirty and racist underbelly of the deep south. Only two years later, the movie is produced, showing even more people the uncomfortable truth. As you may have heard before by the reviews of so many stories, the book is better than the movie. This claim will not come as a surprise to many, for the book is taken as a godsend to a large chunk of the population, where the movie, despite the outstanding quality for the time, is not so well regarded when stacked up against one of America’s favorite pieces of classic literature.
The Contrast of a Timeless Novel and a Classic Movie. During a time of stringent hardships, a young girl always found a way to keep herself enthralled. To Kill a Mockingbird, a timeless novel, was recreated into a movie that was a classic yet distinctive one from the novel. To Kill a Mockingbird is about a girl named Scout Finch who lived in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama during the 1930’s. This book focuses on a couple years of Scout’s childhood and everything that occurs and the lessons that she learns.
But sometimes they could be totally different in what happens in those scenes. Throughout the novel and film color and dialogue had showed up. Colors, and dialogue are both a big part of the novel / film, but they are also different. The film version and the novel "The Giver" were similar in dialogue because in both they really affect how the people in the community react to situations that happen, and they were different in colors because this had affected how the people saw their community .
For some people, reading a book is not the easiest activity in the world. They more prefer to watch movies, but there is always some differences and similarities between movies and stories which based on the same script. My essay will compare and construct the movie "In the bedroom" and "Killings" by Andre Dubus. After I the watched the movie “In the Bedroom" and read the story “Killings” by Andre Dubus, I have noticed a few obvious similarities. Firstly, I noticed that in both versions all characters have the same names.
These details include changes to the script to make it more understandable. The changes to the script also make the movie more realistic and modern. Throughout the movie, A Raisin In The Sun, racism is shown more frequently than the book. For instance, in the movie, new scenes and characters are shown to express the feeling of racism more in the book.
The Mighty Little Scout Did you grow up in a racist community where the blacks and whites did not get along at all? To Kill a Mockingbird is by Harper Lee. To Kill a Mockingbird is about how 2 children are growing up in a very racist community.
Have you ever wondered why most American movies portray people with color or origin as terrorists, maids, or just secondary characters? Have you ever thought of why specific ethnicities and races are represented most of the time as inferiorities? The representation of race, gender, and ethnicity in the media is accompanied by a stuff stereotype, and this is leads to the negativity and discrimination in our society today. I have chosen the movie “Maid in Manhattan” since it portrays and handles the issues of race discrimination and social class inequality. I will be handling each issue separately.
Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner Over the course of the semester, we watched three films form 1967 featuring the actor, Sydney Poitier. Thoughts about marriage in the world have evolved from the first settlers. Interracial relationship has the movie shows, have experienced intense struggles and obstacles in the story. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was my favorite movie because it demonstrates that skin color does not define or determine anything in our lives, liberal education and persuasions can be put to test and that sometimes we do not need anyone approves to do things. They say “love conquers all”, but when the couple in love has two different racial backgrounds, that are when the
Story shows a great focus on interpersonal dynamics between King and his followers, his enemies and his family. The organization of the Selma and DuVernay gives outstanding scenes to a wide variety of character actors in real-life roles. Ava DuVernay’s film is called “Selma” instead of “King” and there is a reason behind it. “Selma” is based on the procedures of political maneuvering, bargaining and fighting as it is about the chief orchestrator of the resulting deals.
Overall, the film and book share many similarities but there are also many differences between the two The film of To Kill a Mockingbird has many strengths throughout its length. The movie goes over and covers all of the major plot points from the book. It covers the major scenes such as the jailhouse scene, when they break into the Radley property, the Tom Robinson trial, and of course when Bob Ewell attempts to kill Jem and Scout.