Instead you were to let god decide what happens to the person or people. (Doc.F) "Justified Or Not Justified" is what the whole point of this DBQ. So I have to decide if Hamlets actions are justified or not justified. I believe that Hamlets actions were justified because Hamlet had went through a lot of trouble to figure out how to get revenge for his father’s death, when he was going to get revenge for his father 's death, and many other things. In the end Hamlet had made a promise to his father 's ghost that he would revenge his father’s death.
Not all people respond with hate and revenge, some people let themselves get walked over but not hamlet. Hamlet does not respond to injustice too kindly. He wants revenge for his father's death, wants to set things right, help out whoever is in charge of people receiving karma by taking things into his own hands. His main goal in the novel is to seek revenge on his father's death, this started when he was visited by the ghost of the old king. The ghost said to him “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” the ghost of the old king wanted Hamlet to seek revenge on claudius for his ‘unnatural” murder of the kind.
King Hamlet may not have been in the play very much, but when he was, he proved to be a very important role. Hamlet’s father needed vengeance against his brother for his murder, stealing his wife and crown, along with taking the crown away from Hamlet. He had a very strong motivation of getting what he wanted in this situation. If he had not shown himself to Hamlet, Horatio, Marcellus, and Bernardo, King Hamlet never would have been able to tell the story of what really had happened. He had a great effect on Hamlet in reminding him on his purpose there.
The foil character introduced is that of Fortinbras. The two could definitely be seen as very similar to each other, since they are both avenging their fathers, but in fact, the reality is that a closer look reveals the signs of the things that set them apart from each other. When the character of Fortinbras is mentioned in Act IV, Scene ii, Hamlet is quick to point out his shortcomings, such as the fact that he was willing to go to excessively large lenghths to avenge his father’s death, even if it meant wasting many lives and troops for a seemingly worthless cause. However, when Hamlet finds a moment alone, he puts his own feelings into words and confesses how he truly sees the situation, which he does after nearly every altercation that is thrown his way. This does not just show that Hamlet is crazy for always talking to himself; it shows that Hamlet is his own confidant.
In this play Hamlet used Deontology without even realizing it. In the beginning he was going to use teleology but then soon realized that it might be a trick and that he should do some investigating. Then in the end he finally realized that the spirit wasn't lying and that his uncle did do it. The reason that he is not insane is that he takes his time to kill his uncle. To conclude this essay the reasons that I used to prove that Hamlet went crazy was that Hamlet started talking to himself in his crazy voice, another reason is that he was the only one who could see the ghost in the bedroom scene.
One such character is Prince Fortinbras from Hamlet. Fortinbras plays a crucial role in Hamlet because his presence provides the reader with a parallel to Hamlet and a constitutional opposite to Hamlet–thus highlighting Hamlet as the central character in the play. Both Hamlet and Fortinbras are shaped by the actions of their fathers and the actions of their uncles. The characters have been shaped not so much by their fathers’ actions, but by their fates. One man killed the other in single combat, while the other was murdered.
He married his mother with no knowledge that it was his mother so he cannot be called materially guilty for that. Although he did not know it was his father, he was still formally guilty. He did do the action, and it was bad, but not depraved. What he did that was depraved, was murder. He murdered his father, although he did not know it was his father.
Laertes wanted to kill same as Hamlet. Both of these men wanted revenge and hated the man of their father’s death. Others would say the most used sin in Hamlet would be pride because that's how it all started and Hamlet did everything for his pride towards his father. I say nay! Nor was it for his father but for himself!
Many people think that it was hubris that caused his death but I just don't think that hubris is a logical explanation. He didn't know the truth about his life, his life and his actions were already predetermined, and he was just living life with curiosity. The first reason that hubris was not the reason Oedipus died was because he didn't know the truth of anything. He didn't know that he killed the king, let alone knew that Laius was his father. On page three Oedipus says “whoever he was that killed the king may readily wish to dispatch me with his murderous hand, so helping the dead king i help myself”(3).
Oedipus Rex essay Final draft Oedipus certainly deserved his fate. Oedipus and his actions are clearly disrespect to the gods , he faces the fate he deserves. He was doing things that would eventually lead up to the unfortunate event of his death , he was even warned by the great and wise Teiresias , but he being himself was to stubborn and did not listen. All the things Teiresias said would happen became the truth. He killed his father, married his mother, yet he tempted his fate , he deserved everything that came his way .
And another part of him couldn 't help but wish de Foix was his father, as he had first thought. There was also a small part of him that wished he hadn 't grown up in the Court of Miracles but in a safe and happy home with a loving family. However, a much larger and rational part of him was grateful and accepting of the man his childhood had helped him become. If he had grown up privileged and as the heir of Belgard, would he be the man he is today? Even so, Porthos had to admit he wasn 't pleased with his own behaviour these past few days.
In William Shakespeare 's play The Tragedy of Hamlet Prince of Denmark there are a variety of different characters with similar motives for their actions. Most of the characters’ motives stem from love, whether it be lust, family ties, romance, loyalty, or devotion. Hamlet, out of devotion for his father, promises to get revenge for his murder when his ghost tells Hamlet that Claudius killed him, and that he wants Hamlet to kill Claudius for revenge. Ophelia’s family ties to her father, Polonius, make her betray the love of Hamlet. Horatio’s loyalty makes him the only character that Hamlet trusts.