ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Han China And Imperial Rome

494 Words2 Pages

The empires of the classical era have many similar characteristics, but they also had many defining qualities. For example, Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E-220 C.E.) have utilized their methods of political control in various ways. These two empires had similar methods of political control concerning defense. Other methods of political control were different in the sense of how they conducted their society within the empires. Methods of political control in imperial rome and Han China were similar in the sense that both empire defense systems were weak and fragmented which later led to the collapse of central governments. Still these empires had many differences such as,ideas of culture in relation with the people. …show more content…

Some examples that led to the collapse of the empires include, the Roman and Chinese borders were overrun by incursions time and time again thanks to the weak frontier defense system. As a result of the defense systems being problematic, the empires were forced to build walls to protect the people within the empire. The cost of the defense system soon skyrocketed, and as a result economic prosperity within the society began to erode. The Han and Roman Empire had problems protecting themselves and tried to prevent invasions with the implementation of borders, however the empires ultimately collapsed.
The two empires had different ideas of culture in relation with the people and their viewpoints. The Chinese had a defined hierarchy. Whereas the Romans had a weaker not as defined hierarchy with no equivalent religion to Confucianism. Family was the foundation in Chinese culture, the Romans lacked this particular quality. Both empires contrast because of their vastly different views because of culture and

Show More
Related

  • How Did The Chinese Empire Differ From That Of The Roman Empire

    806 Words  | 4 Pages

    In comparing the Roman and Chinese empires, which do you find more striking—their similarities or their

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Han China And Rome

    693 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty allowed ecological creation to impact, their society economically. But, with human resources it allowed both empires to consolidate their power with limits; rather than expanding their empires. The Roman and Han Dynasty showed their power of quality in building a empire. In three hundred and fifty BCE, Rome was one of several city states on the Italian peninsula with no imperial ancestors.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Tang And Song Dynasty

    296 Words  | 2 Pages

    As China grew with population and technologies, so did their government. Their military was weak but they had the idea to make iron and steel weaponry. The increase of weapons allowed the Chinese military to have more power over the people. Yet, the downfall of their era was their tactics in controlling their army and the rebellious citizens. As China’s economy and population grows, so does the growth of politics and Urban life styles.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Roman Empire And Chinese Empires

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Roman, Chinese and Indian empire are the three main empires that exist in the past and inspired the rest of the empires that came afterwards. The Roman empire used trade and government to get where it was. The Chinese empire used legalism and a strong army. The Indian empire used religion to be successful. An empire consists of many different features, but there are some specific key features that makes an empire a strong and powerful empire and it usually consist of a strong military, effective leader, religion, trade and a lot more different features.

    Read More

  • Why Do Empires Fail

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard and an author, has stated that “empires inevitably fail, and when they do, history judges them for the legacies they leave behind.” Feldman really hit the nail on the head with regards to describing one of the countless important aspects of history—analyzing it. A positive benefit of evaluating an empire is to examine the reasoning behind the empire thriving, even if it may only be a short period of time. Comparing one empire to another may also solidify one’s beliefs regarding the advances that have contributed elsewhere, as well as explaining its downfall. Although both Imperial Rome and Han China shared a similar strategy to expand their empires yet differed in the governments’ thoughts on an individual’s role in a society and the selection for positions of power, they both exemplify that “an empire is never too big to fail.”

    Read More

  • What Are The Similarities Between Rome And Han China

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    The time is the third century BCE to the third century CE, two major world empires are in reign; these empires are Han China and Imperial Rome. Both of these empires rule in many of the same ways, yet are vastly different in the way they rule. During this time empires everywhere were growing, and people were learning to live in new ways as new forms of government become more present in society. In Han China, Emperor Gaozu takes over as first emperor as the Han Empire. His empire controls China for almost four hundred years.

    Read More

  • Rome And Han China Comparative Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    Perhaps the two most important civilizations, Rome and Han China both fell due to major similarities. At the same time, Rome and Han China fell due to distinct differences as well. Furthermore, the collapse of China and Rome had far more similarities rather than differences. During 200 and 600 BCE both classical civilizations suffered from outside invasions; growing from Central Asia. They were not as sweeping as earlier Indo-European growth but tested Rome and China severely.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

    1233 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ming And Qing Dynasty

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Ming and Qing dynasties were two of many dynasties in China. They were also in fact, the last two dynasties. The Ming dynasty ruled from 1368-1644, and the Qing empire ruled from 1644-1912. Both dynasties had long lasting eras of power because of strong framework from influential leaders. The Ming dynasty had Zhu Yuanzhang who was a successful war leader.

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Imperial Rome And Han China

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Chinese Dynasties

    1274 Words  | 6 Pages

    Different periods throughout China’s history have different names, known as dynasties, for the diverse positions within its society. Theoretically, all of the periods are similar, with the government and military officials ranking high in the hierarchy, and the average everyday people being under regular Chinese law. Throughout China’s history, the society has been organized into a hierarchic system of socio-economic classes, known as the four occupations. The four occupations system seems to have become distorted after the commercialization of Chinese culture during the Song Dynasty. Even though the social rankings within the country are not as predominant as they once were, the people living within the country still know their “place” within the society.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

    1525 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Mesopotamia And Ancient China

    407 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient China shared the same type of government. Although Ancient Mesopotamia began ruling its lands with priest kings eventually came to rule just as Ancient China, both civilization believed kings had divine approval. Social classes among both civilization followed the upper class, middle class, lower class structure. Upper class among the two consisted of the higher gods, kings, priest etc. Middle class consisted of peasant farmers, merchants, fisherman etc.

    Read More

  • Imperial Administration In Ancient East Asia

    111 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imperial administration in ancient South Asia and ancient East Asia had many similarities and differences among them. , during the period of 600 BCE- 600 CE. Ancient South Asia and ancient East Asia both had their lands controlled in some sort of system administration, which at many times pertained to some sort of religion symbolism. However, ancient South Asia proclaimed a “caste system”, a hierarchy in which placed people each in their own role or purpose in life- and were born into it; in contrast, in ancient East Asia their imperial administration consisted of an emperor which would rule all of the area, make the rules, and proclaim control over the people.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Han China And Imperial Rome

Open Document