God in the Old Testament is perceived in many ways, from violent to loving, to unjust and fair-minded. David Lamb and Richard Dawkins both explain contradicting perceptions of God. Dawkins’ quote from, “The God Delusion” gives off a negative tone of God’s image. Dawkins uses words such as: misogynistic, megalomaniacal, and a capriciously malevolent bully.” While Lamb applauds Dawkins’ attempt to bring the issues up to the surface, Lamb believes that Dawkins exaggerates the negative side of God. However, Lamb does acknowledge the different sides of God and the way he chooses to handle a situation. Lamb responds to Dawkins’ claims by providing full examples of God behaving badly and he shows his positive aspects as well(17). Lamb reveals that …show more content…
In Lamb’s chapter, “Sexist or Affirming?”, Lamb explains how many christian women stop following God because of how he portrays women as just servants to men. However, Lamb says that, “The charge of sexism in the Bible is based upon a lack of knowledge of Scripture”(47). He elaborates more on how God created mankind in his image and he blessed both men and women. However, even the order of who came first makes people believe that God put women inferior to men. However, we are not supposed to get confused over the term submission and inferior and label them equal to each other. God brought a woman out of a manand when Adam and Eve sinned they were both put under difficult circumstances. Eve was cursed with painful childbearing and submission to Adam. While Adam was told, “...cursed is the ground because of you”. Lamb explains how the woman’s, “curse” was not really a curse, “...while the ground of the man is cursed (and the serpent is directly cursed)”(57). Lamb tells us that it was not God’s intention to bring forth such harsh punishment to both the first man and women, but their disobedience to him resulted in punishment. God wants us to know that out of love he protects us and provides discipline to guide us into the correct …show more content…
While in other’s eyes God is just using his power and legalistic ways in a negative way for his people. Lamb explains how through God’s mercy he gives us grace through obedience to his laws he creates. These, “harsh laws”(121), were set aside for the people in the land to follow to have an account to. The creation of these laws was for Israel to have a legal system(122), they were given many laws to follow since they were a nation right out of slavery. Many of these laws were actually a blessing to his people, such as the commandment of the Sabbath day. God told the Israelites to rest after their six days of tiresome labor, and to keep the Sabbath day holy. Another claim against the Sabbath day is the death of the man who was collecting sticks on that day and God ordered for him to be stoned death(125). People use this example of God to be shown as unmerciful and megalomaniacal. While no one listens to the underlying cause of God’s actions. A man who was supposed to be resting on a holy day God set out for the Israelites was working and God gave clear instructions not to do so on that day. As a result, he was stoned to death and God only wants his children to obey his rules and to honor and respect him. Also, God gave specific instructions and showed the importance of the Sabbath
The problem of evil is a logical problem that creates a contradiction in the theist’s belief that God is both omnipotent and wholly good. If God were all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good, he would be conscious of all the evil that is present in the world, he would be able to cure the suffering that occurs in our world, and he would want there to be only goodness. However, we are a population encompassed by wickedness and cruelty; thus, we cannot logically agree to a God. This conflict, identified as the problem of evil, is a logical
He made laws to follow and if you broke them you were punished. The Virgin always forgave. God had power. He spoke and the thunder echoed through the skies. The Virgin was full of a quiet, peaceful love”(44).
Jonathan Edwards uses several types of writing skills to persuade his audience of God’s intentions. His use of figurative language, analogies, imagery, and repetition all emphasize Edwards’s views. He uses fear, anger, and apathy to appeal to the audience in attempt to warn his audience of God’s intentions. Jonathan Edwards uses fear in this sermon to terrorize his audience into thinking of God as someone to be feared, not someone to be loved. Throughout the sermon, Edwards uses figurative language along with imagery to frighten the audience.
Although, the Israelites laws were established by the Commandments. Also,
From the beginning of the bible places both man and women at
As narrated through one of the most significant books in history, humankind is inherently flawed and needs a single ruler, the Lord God, to sublimate their culture. If people remain obedient and devoted to God by following the rules He lays out for them, the society will have order and harmony. Through human nature, patriarchy, and the transition from henotheism to monotheism, the purpose of the Bible is for a single God to issue rules to humans, giving them a set of laws and a hierarchy. Human nature is to be evil and therefore they need the rules presented in the Bible in order to live a prosperous religious life. God only makes laws for humans, because unlike angels, they are born evil.
Rhetorical Analysis "Fear is an instructor of great sagacity and the herald of all resolutions. "- Ralph Waldo Emerson. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” was a sermon written and delivered by American reverend Jonathan Edwards in 1741, and was an outstanding example of the potentially dominant convincing powers of the use of Rhetoric. The sermon, even when read silently, is effective in projecting a specific interpretation of the wrathful nature of God and the sinful nature of man.
The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is
The overarching theme of abuse towards women regarding their comparable experiences is what makes these women’s stories unique in both the bible and Song of Solomon (SparkNotes
People who disobeyed the bible were executed or forced to leave their village. To them God was everything and they lived to please
The Religion Influences in The Handmaid’s Tale Word Count: 1563 This purpose of this essay is to establish and explain connections between the Christian Religion and ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. It is not attempting to point out flaws or discriminate against the religion. Margret Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ is a dystopian novel, that centres around the themes of corruption, oppression, and theocracy. Told in the first person, the novel follows the female ‘Offred’ in her daily life/activities and past experiences in the newly founded “Republic of Gilead”.
Women were held responsible for the first original sin or sometimes known as the fall of mankind. Since Eve took the apple from the snake the church felt it was necessary to punish all women for her mistakes. In the book of Genesis, God tells Eve “Your Desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you” (Hopkins 5-6). People during the Medieval Society took this as an order that women should at all times be obedient to their Summerlin 2 husbands. The church got rich off of peoples fear of the devil and again, women were the subject of
God forbid hard heads, philosophers, poets, orators, mad and scholars. " The idea that God has always been a great tool to calm the people in society and determine hope for a better life in all
Introduction: Professors Richard Dawkins and John Lennox go head to head in a battle to match their superior intellect. The debate was titled “Has Science Buried God?” Lennox also announced his new book “Gods Undertaker”. The John Lennox - Richard Dawkins Debate - bethinking.org. 2015
Men make laws to instill order in a society and prevent chaos in any shape or form. Naturally, laws will always be somewhat unjust because it is impossible to consistently construct laws that directly and equally benefit all members of a society. There will always be a majority that makes the laws and a minority that has to obey the laws. Although laws are usually the standard of morality by which we live by, they must be disobeyed in certain situations. These situations are, but not limited to, an undemocratic formation of aforementioned laws, laws that are inherently unjust according to human law which can be synonymous with God’s law.