ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr

820 Words4 Pages

To gain my admiration, a civil rights leader should be honest and open about their opinions without causing harm, effective in their ability to inspire others, and able to do what is right even when others doubt them. Even though Malcolm X expressed most these characteristics, I admire the works and accomplishments of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. because he was able to accomplish many things through peaceful protests and motivating words. Dr. King was able to promote equality for all races and showed kindness to everyone. Honesty is one of the characteristics a civil rights leader should have to gain my admiration. Dr. King was very honest about his intentions from the beginning. Although both men wanted the same thing, their intentions differed. …show more content…

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both had many people doubting them and not supporting them. Malcolm X was a black muslim which at the time was not favorable in society. Malcolm X wanted to have equality and be segregated from the white Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. faced many people that were violent and that did not agree with him many times, yet he did not act out aggressively or violently against those people. Dr. King Jr. wanted to accomplish equality in a peaceful way. He knew that the only way to get his point across was through peace. However, unlike Martin Luther King Jr, Malcolm X was sometimes frustrated with the people that disagreed with him such as other white Americans and he encouraged violence to get what he wanted. Although both men went against popular belief and continued their actions, In my opinion Dr. King Jr was able to do what was right and not acted violently against the white Americans even though they did not agree with him. Even when Martin Luther King Jr was arrested several times for marching and protesting, that did not stop him from continuing spread his beliefs and dreams for the

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Dr King And Malcolm X

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    King believed in a nonviolent approach to the Civil Rights movement, Malcolm X demonstrated a different means to addressing the movement. Malcolm X proclaim that the best way to understand and in order to obtain the same overall goal (in this case equality) one has to speak the same language as the other person in context. He proclaims this through the example of guns within the document and that if a person speaks this way, then this is the best way to answer their statement. The same aspects occurred within a duel in the old west. If a person was called out they would answer accordingly or be branded a coward for the rest of their life.

    Read More

  • What Is The Rhetorical Methods Of Martin Luther King And Malcolm X

    795 Words  | 4 Pages

    Martin Luther King and Malcolm X go down in history as the most prominent figures of the civil rights movement. Although they are often put against each other because of their different approaches, they were similar in several ways, such as their ability to make crowds grasp on to their words and follow their lead. So the question to be asked is not whether Dr King or Malcolm X was better, more moral, or logical, but what about them was so alluring to the masses that trusted them as leaders in the movement. Both Martin Luther King jr. and Malcolm X manipulated the emotions of audiences through powerful rhetorical methods, but applied them in different ways.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Letter From Birmingham Jail And Malcolm X

    2022 Words  | 9 Pages

    While controversial, these ideas were deeply principled and reflected Malcolm X's commitment to defending the rights and dignity of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, believed in the power of nonviolent resistance as a means of achieving civil rights. King understood that nonviolent resistance could be a slow and difficult process, requiring patience, strategy, and a strong commitment to nonviolence. Which causes him to fall into pragmatism. Iy contrast, Malcolm X's belief of self-defense and the use of violence when necessary was often seen as more confrontational and less pragmatic.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcolm X Dbq

    724 Words  | 3 Pages

    Malcolm X believed that blacks and whites should work separately, but have the same rights as one another. He also thought that blacks must achieve that through any means necessary. I believe that Martin Luther King had the better philosophy. He understood that violence wouldn’t fix everything, he was extremely determined, and he wanted the black and white communities to join together as one nation.

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Dbq

    1803 Words  | 8 Pages

    While King’s non-aggressive civil rights movement was extremely structured and led by organized protests, Malcolm X’s aggressive civil rights movement was less formally organized but many participants were influenced by his strong rhetoric. Malcolm X believed that his goals should be accomplished by any means possible, even if it meant that African-Americans needed to employ aggressive tactics in order to protect themselves. Malcolm X, who converted to the Nation of Islam while in prison during the late 1940s, worked with the nation’s leader Elijah Muhammad. Malcolm X’s conversion was one of the main things that differentiated him from Martin Luther King; while King preached Christian messages, often involving peace and love, Malcolm X preached Islamic messages, often involving justice and respect. Malcolm X believed that African-Americans were never going to get what they wanted by working with white society; he believed that African-Americans had to work alone.

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Dbq Essay

    639 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, civil rights have been a persistent issue, as far back as enslavement in the First Civilizations, such as Mesopotamia. With the issues however, a great many people have stood up for the rights of themselves and others. None of these people have been more prominent than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King was the person who most impacted civil right because of the sheer number of people he captivated, as well as his calls for change being carried out in a nonviolent manner. Not many people have the power of persuasion, and even fewer possess it to the degree held by Dr. King. "

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Malcolm X

    1692 Words  | 7 Pages

    The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. earned him to be recognized as the face of the Civil Rights movement. Therefore, Malcolm X should have changed his leadership style to work with Martin Luther King Jr. because his way of fighting for civil rights was strategically thought out and ultimately effective. Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights movement. He was born in Atlanta, Georgia to Reverend Martin Luther King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. Martin Luther King Jr. came from a line of pastors in his family, and from the beginning, he was on his way to becoming one himself (Martin Luther King Jr.).

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Dbq Essay

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    He wanted people to join hands. Martin Luther King wanted people to come together and be able to sit down together at one big table together regardless of their color. (Document B) "sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit together at the table of brotherhood. Martin Luther King wanted all people to come together and join hands well, on the other hand, Malcolm X wanted people to be in their separate groups working with their people. Some people did not agree that all people should come together.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Vs Malcolm X Dbq Essay

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr were civil right leaders who were well respected for their ideas. However, they had differences that would impact the success of their initiatives. Malcolm X had superior solutions for a strong centralized black community and a stable black economy, while King’s ideas made more sense in terms of his nonviolent philosophy and push for an integrated education system. Whiles Martin Luther King, Jr’s idea about blacks and whites together would work in a perfect society,America was far from a perfect society in the 1960s.

    Read More

  • Malcolm X: Racial Separatism And Black Nationalism

    157 Words  | 1 Pages

    Malcolm X reconsidered how many African Americans understood White America as a system of racial oppression which he thought they themselves can solve. Today, Dr. Martin King and Malcolm X as two opposite dogma in terms of today’s history. This misconception, breaches the influences of what each man (King and Malcolm X) had. Although, Martin Luther strongly believed in racial integration and Malcolm X himself believed in racial separatism and Black Nationalism.

    Read More

  • Philosophical Differences Between Martin Luther King And Malcolm X

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Comparison Essay

    1125 Words  | 5 Pages

    The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X

    1250 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Leadership Style

    1690 Words  | 7 Pages

    The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr

Open Document