The Civil Rights Movement in the United States is synonymous with two key figures. Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. played roles of their own in progressing their race forward in 1950s America. While they both took very different routes and had competing ideologies in how the African American race would move forward they were equally important. When studying key activists it is important to understand their motivations, where they came from, and what they had hoped to achieve. Key speeches given by both of the highly talented protagonists of this essay are an important medium from which to gather this information. This essay, therefore, endeavours to compare and contrast the roles of both King and Malcolm X as two men fighting for …show more content…
Coming from a family which saw both his Grandfather and Father attending and graduating from the prestigious Morehouse College, his success was almost inevitable arguably bolstering his abilities in his future career, as intelligence and strategic planning were very much his ally. Malcolm X on the other hand came from a family dealing with the negative effects of having an outspoken black right activist within its mists. Born Malcolm Little in 1925, in Omaha, Nebraska, Malcolm’s family were notorious in an area known for, what the Klu Klux Klan called, “good Negroes.” Malcolm’s father Earl Little, himself from a family of activists for civil rights; was a prominent supporter of the ‘Back to Africa movement’ proposed by Marcus Garvey in the 1920s. Reinvigorated under the “Universal Negro Improvement Association” by Garvey the movement caused the Klan in Omaha to take matters into their own hands, regarding the Little Family. Eventually causing the children, including Malcolm, to go into care, the events of Earl’s life as a “crazy ni**er,” according to Malcolm himself were his first experiences of segregation. …show more content…
Whilst King, as has already been explained, used his Christian ethics and non-violent protesting form to champion the end of segregation, pushing for integration, hence the title “integrationist”. Malcolm X was not the friend of the white man, he wanted to remain segregated, he was a “Black Nationalist” and a proud supporter and follower of Elijah Muhammad, and the Nation of Islam. A black supremacist the role of Malcolm X is enshrined in the Nation of Islam for a significant time of his life. He first became known and first entered the public eye in 1957 in the Johnson Hinton incident. After hearing about the brutal attack of Hinton and three other Nation members Malcolm X got involved on Hinton’s side. Whilst failing to change anything for Hinton, other than his health, it demonstrated his power in the Nation and the role he was playing, thousands of people had turned up at the police station he was at. Not only did thousands of people attend the police station, Malcolm vastly increased membership, from 500 to 25,000. His prominence only grew from there, whilst a member of the Nation he preached their values and this viewpoint led him to see King as a “chump.” His role in the Nation of Islam saw him promote opposing views to that of the NAACP and King, particularly in terms of voting. He believed and taught that members of the Nation should not partake in
This book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human
In the end, even though both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both have a similar goals,they both have diffrent way of achieving them. Malcolm X uses repetition to to bluntly state his purposes and to point out issues. Martin Luther King Uses parallel structure to refute what the clergymen had to say about the actions of the blacks and labeling him an extremist. Yet even though both malcolm X and Martin Luther king did use rhetorical question, they used it to serve different purposes. Malcolm X used it to get the audience thinking on what they should do next and how they did not accomplish anything, while Martin Luther King used it to question the Clergymen's way of thinking and to ask where the white christians were at when blacks were being
Everyone knows Martin Luther King Jr. but not everyone knows Malcolm X. Malcolm got into the Civil Rights Movement when his father was killed by a white supremacist group called the Black Legion. Malcolm wanted to do something about it so he started public speaking at a place called the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X did plenty of things for African American human rights that people don’t know about. The points we are going to be focusing are on Malcolm’s youth, human right impact, and how he changed. First, let 's talk about how Malcolm’s father changed Malcolm along with his family.
After his meeting with Muhammad in Chicago, Malcolm went to the upstart African-American borough of New York known as Harlem and began to organize Temples for the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X was above all else a voice for the people, because despite the surprising low number of members in the Nation(50,000 per Britannica.com) the influence and power of the Nation was undeniable. So, with his platform of being a key figure in The Nation of Islam, Malcolm X challenged mainstream ideals of major civil rights activists like Dr.Martin Luther King Jr., citing that integration was not the key to civil rights and the blacks should be independent and self-sufficient. The constant assault of famous figures came back to haunt him because after the assassination of JFK, Malcolm publicly pronounced that this was merely an example of “chickens coming home to roost”. This sparked controversy not just on a large scale but also on a personal scale for Malcolm as his leader and partner in the teachings of The Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad, who sentenced him to a 90 day silence
In the unstable American culture of the mid twentieth century, Malcolm was conceived. Like each other dark youth, he felt the torment of isolation; however, dissimilar to numerous who were conceived before him and the individuals who were his contemporary, Malcolm emphatically fancied a change. He realized that is something was going on, he realized that something must be done, and he additionally realized that he could accomplish something however how was not exactly clear. When he in the long run chose to peruse law keeping in mind the end goal to gain a fundamental training for his course was the point at which his dad Early Little, minister and a coordinator for Marcus Garvey's general Negro Improvement Association was killed along these
Malcolm X was an effective leader because he had exceptional communication skills. These skills are viewed in his speech “By Any Means Necessary” and have been analyzed. The main goal of this speech was for blacks to figure out or to begin to figure out, what they can do to change the injustice, in order for blacks to gain things that
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
When he joined the Nation of Islam, he changed his family name from “Little” to “X” as it was “a custom among Nation of Islam followers who considered their family names to have originated with white slaveholders” (1). Malcolm benefited the organization by being a spokesman and expanding the movement (“Malcolm X.” History. History Channel, n.d 1). He “became the minister of Temple No. 7 in Harlem and Temple No. 11 in Boston” (“Malcolm X Biography” 1). “An articulate public speaker, a charismatic personality, and an indefatigable organizer, Malcolm X expressed the pent-up anger, frustration, and bitterness of African Americans during the major phase of the Civil Rights Movement from 1955 to 1965”
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.
This journal article belabours the point that is also a common theme in “The Autobiography of Malcolm X”: Malcolm’s changing views on civil rights. Again as a result of his tumultuous childhood because of the “white man”, Malcolm generalizes all white people as essentially haters of blacks because of the negative experiences he’s had with them and the tragic ways they treated him. But, as he grows older and matures, Malcolm has the eye-opening experience of seeing people of all colors worship next to each other. This is an interaction between blacks and whites that creates a positive environment as an outcome.
Introduction: Malcom X urges the Negro community to fight to gain the equal rights they deserve by taking action against their white oppressors. He emphasizes that blacks will gain their rights either thorough voting, with the ballot, or else through the inevitable violence with the bullet. Thesis [part a] Like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., also fighting for the civil rights of black Americans in the 1960s, but in a more peaceful manner, Malcom X takes a different approach.
Imagine living in a world of segregation - constantly judged by color of one’s skin and not being permitted to associate with the “superior” race. From slavery to discrimination, African-Americans experienced this horror in daily life since the beginning of their existence. Due to the fear of severe punishment, blacks were scared to fight for equality; however, on April 3, 1964 in Cleveland, Ohio, one brave soul finally did. His name was Malcolm Little (known as Malcolm X), a widely acknowledged human rights activist. Although he supported black equality, he attacked the problem unlike others such as Martin Luther King Jr. did.
Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.
The Story of Malcolm X Malcolm X was a Black rights activist during the 1960’s, he was regarded as a powerful speaker and a highly intelligent person. He was averse to blacks and white living in harmony, and spearheaded the black separatist movement. Malcolm X was not always the man that is taught to the public in history classes however, “Learning to read”, and excerpt from Malcolm X’s autobiography, recounts the tale of who Malcolm X was before he was well read, and how a prison’s library shaped views during the civil rights movement, and started fanning the flames for his racism.
Malcolm’s speeches acted more as instruments of provocation than conversion. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr.’s campaign, Malcolm’s campaign around the country was a direct assault and it was difficult to see any oppressor that will tolerate such. This obviously accounted for the many police brutalities, imprisonment and deaths among the black race. Malcolm X symbolized black dominance and self-respect, he was one of the greatest forces that shaped the current understanding and interpretation given to conflict and violence in the world politics today. If Malcolm were to live in this era, he would be labeled as a terrorist (http://malcolmx.com/).