Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcom X
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X are two of the most influential African - American leaders in history despite this, the two have vastly opposing views on positive and negative liberty. Using their noted differences in opinion we will explore what the two leaders would have advised the Cherokee Indians to do in the face of the Indian Removal Act. The Indian Removal Act was a law signed into order by the U.S. that gave the government the right to displace Cherokee Indians out of their rightful land east of the Mississippi River to move to the west. This resulted in a multitude of Indians losing their rightfully owned property, and ultimately their lives. Martin Luther King Jr. was an advocate for positive liberty and reforming procedural justice. Dr. King Jr. would have advised the Cherokee Indians to find a middle ground to adjust the terms of the Indian Removal Act. Dr. King Jr.’s devotion to positive liberty and justice is exhibited in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”. As an advocate for civil disobedience, King ultimately …show more content…
and Malcom X are two of the most affluential leaders in history their strategies could not be more contrasting. Malcom X was a leader who was much more willing to promote to idea of negative justice. The Cherokee Indians under the leadership of Malcom X would be led to construct an organized revolt against the American government even though it will be bloody. On the contrary Martin Luther King Jr. would lead the Cherokee Indians in an entirely different direction. Dr. King Jr. would instruct the Cherokee to revolt against the American government using organized and peaceful demonstrations. Using positive justice and liberty Martin Luther would peacefully lead and mandate the Cherokee Indians to proceed to follow him. The Indian Removal Act would constitute a hurdle to both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X, but each would restore the situation through positive liberty and negative justice
Malcolm X Book Report
971 Words | 4 PagesThis book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human
Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail
458 Words | 2 PagesVisionary champion of the American dream and interracial brotherhood, Martin Luther King is widely acclaimed for his unwavering leadership during the African-American Civil Rights Movement. As a pastor and activist, King consistently preached a doctrine of non-violent civil disobedience based on his beliefs in equality and the Christian faith. On April 16, 1963, while in solitary confinement in an Alabama Jail, King completed “Letter from Birmingham Jail” which would become one of the most seminal texts of the Civil Rights Movement. King’s patient tone throughout the work, along with his acute understanding of rhetoric allows him to admonish his critics, reach a diverse audience, create a reverberating call for justice, and present a blistering critique of the United States’ duplicity regarding equality. The quintessential text of the African- American Civil Rights Movement, King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was instrumental in both galvanizing the Civil Rights Movements and creating the platform for freedom and equality in the present day United States.
Martin Luther King Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary
526 Words | 3 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. maybe one of the most notable Americans to ever live. He stood up against the racial injustices of his time to become the greatest and most influential civil rights activist. In his “A Letter From a Birmingham Jail”, King writes to the clergymen of Alabama explaining his stance against segregation and the importance of civil disobedience to fulfill a more just society. In his letter, King expresses many philosophical ideas to support his stance on equality.
What Is The Rhetorical Methods Of Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
795 Words | 4 PagesMartin Luther King and Malcolm X go down in history as the most prominent figures of the civil rights movement. Although they are often put against each other because of their different approaches, they were similar in several ways, such as their ability to make crowds grasp on to their words and follow their lead. So the question to be asked is not whether Dr King or Malcolm X was better, more moral, or logical, but what about them was so alluring to the masses that trusted them as leaders in the movement. Both Martin Luther King jr. and Malcolm X manipulated the emotions of audiences through powerful rhetorical methods, but applied them in different ways.
Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail By Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
1207 Words | 5 PagesDr. Martin Luther King, King discusses several actions the people must stop making and prejudices they must stop holding along with actions that individuals such as the observant white moderate must start taking for there to be a successful Utopian effort towards the improvement of societal relations. Although King considers what he has written as long for a letter, the content is concise and carries powerful relevance to the issue of societal segregation. By now, most of the civil right issues with the law have been resolved or improved, but many of the concerns from King are still applicable to current issues such as that of being defined as an outsider and what it takes to be considered an American by your neighbor. King’s large approval of nonviolent protest as a means to establish negotiation helps make efforts to achieve a more perfect society. Also, it is portrayed as a proper form of revolution that belongs in a Utopian society’s setup.
Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
1692 Words | 7 PagesThe most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.
March On Washington Speech Rhetorical Analysis
1236 Words | 5 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. inexplicably opened the eyes of Americans across the nation with his role in the movement and his use of resonating imagery, excellent emotional appeal, powerful voice, and evocation of logic in his “I Have a Dream” speech. With such an enthralling rhetoric he gained a vast amount of support and exponentially increased the pride in standing up for what’s righteous and just. Exemplifying the throes of being a colored person, King evoked sympathy whilst simultaneously applying the valid logic that no human should be subjected to lesser standards. His rhetoric wholly changed American history that day and thus conveyed his ability to maintain equanimity throughout all of the
Malcolm X's Speech By Any Means Necessary
780 Words | 4 PagesOn June 28, 1964, the Black Nationalist leader Malcolm X delivered a very powerful speech. A speech called “By Any Means Necessary”. During the time of speech, the major issue of the United States was gaining the true rights of an African American. Although Slavery had been abolished, blacks were still treated as less than human. Over the years, they worked hard to get their rights and are continuing to do so.
Malcolm X Dbq Analysis
563 Words | 3 PagesMLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
Philosophical Differences Between Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
1512 Words | 7 PagesPhilosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Speech
1848 Words | 8 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. Hence, King’s works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower.
Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X
525 Words | 3 PagesMartin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.
Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Comparison Essay
1125 Words | 5 PagesThe men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so
Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X
1250 Words | 5 PagesFocusing specifically on the opposition of racial segregation, The Civil Rights movement symbolized the need for change across America. Between the years of 1950 and 1960, events such as; the March on Washington, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, speeches, protests, and sit-ins, directly defined such opposition. Due to such events, two outstanding leaders of their time, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X emerged into the public eye and began to impact the Civil Rights movement. At a turning point of the century, the two men took charge and became icons across the world while resonating significantly with African American minorities. With such in mind, the two men had extreme differences in their morals, ideals, and religions; however, both deemed
Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Kennedy
874 Words | 4 PagesJohn Fitzgerald Kennedy, another incredible man, affirmed in his inaugural address that he would do anything to insure “survival and success of liberty” for Americans and it cost him his life (jfklibrary). Beyond his wealth and power, Kennedy was always considerate of the common man. This essay will explain how both Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy wanted to end segregation with faith and cooperation, but their ideas of achieving change were different; this essay will also connect their sacrifices, like going to jail or having the will to die, for the sake of the people.
More about Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcom X
Malcolm X Book Report
971 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail
458 Words | 2 PagesMartin Luther King Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary
526 Words | 3 PagesWhat Is The Rhetorical Methods Of Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
795 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail By Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
1207 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
1692 Words | 7 PagesMarch On Washington Speech Rhetorical Analysis
1236 Words | 5 PagesMalcolm X's Speech By Any Means Necessary
780 Words | 4 PagesMalcolm X Dbq Analysis
563 Words | 3 PagesPhilosophical Differences Between Martin Luther King And Malcolm X
1512 Words | 7 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Speech
1848 Words | 8 PagesSimilarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X
525 Words | 3 PagesMartin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Comparison Essay
1125 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X
1250 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Kennedy
874 Words | 4 Pages