Miss Dove and Leiningen … intro sentence… Miss Dove and Leiningen share many similar qualities shown during their stories “Good Morning, Miss Dove” and “Leiningen Versus the Ants.” Throughout their stories, they show that they can be straightforward, observant, and motivational. To explain, Miss Dove and Leiningen are straightforward while speaking to the people they lead. " ' Well, lads,' he began, 'we've lost the first round. But don't worry, we'll smash the beggars yet, don't you worry. Anyone who thinks otherwise can draw his pay out of here and now and push off. There are rafts enough and to spare on the river,and plenty of time still to reach 'em.' " This shows that he was straight with his men, and as a result, his men always believed …show more content…
Yesterday her carrot- colored mane had been neatly braided and pulled back from her serious, freckled face. Now it hung to her shoulders, a bushy mop of undulations and frizzy ringlets. It hung on her mind, too; that was plain to see. For Jincey’s expression was one of utter and enviable complacency.” If Miss Dove wasn’t observant, then she wouldn't be able to notice if her class were misbehaving behind her back or if her children were struggling. Lastly, Miss Dove and Leiningen are both motivational. This is shown on page 74 of “Leiningen Versus the Ants” where it says, “Realizing that another such casualty, yes, perhaps this alone, might plunge his men into confusion and destroy their morale, Leiningen roared in a bellow louder than the yells of the victim: ‘Into the petrol, idiot! Douse your paws in the petrol!” With everyone feeling like they were as good as dead, Leiningen motivated them and told them to protect themselves with the petrol and continue fighting. Throughout the story, Leiningen continued to encourage the Indians, which lead them to win the war against the ants. As page 6 of “Good Morning, Miss Dove” states, “ Well, it …show more content…
As page 54 of “Good Morning, Miss Dove,” states, “She saw them as a challenge. Their babyish shyness, their lisping pronunciation, their reckless forgetfulness- these evoked no compassion from Miss Dove. They were qualities to be nipped and pruned. Her classes were like a body of raw recruits that she was to toughen and charge with purpose. Miss Dove was the stuff that commanders were made of.” If her children were to act out, they would be glared at by Miss Dove. By that singular glare, they would know they angered Miss Dove and immediately stop their misbehaving. On the other hand, through pages 80 and 81, it portrays the amount of pain Leiningen had to withstand to complete his mission. He endured multiple ant bites and the hot flames surrounding him, all to finally destroy the ants and save the village from their rampage. Miss Dove was tough but she was tough in an orderly way; she made sure her children would listen to her and behave accordingly. Whereas, Leiningen was tough in the war sense; willing to go above and beyond to protect people from the oncoming danger coming their way. Lastly, Miss Dove and Leiningen differ from the way they behave. Miss Dove is orderly and reserved, as opposed to Leiningen who was outgoing and spoke his mind. This is proven on page 71 of “Leiningen Versus the Ants” says, “Act of God, my eye! Anyway, I’m not an old woman; I’m not going to run for it just because an elemental’s on the way. And don't think I'm the kind
“Whatever verve there was left in her, whatever was of love and beauty and joy that had not been squeezed out by life, had been there in the marigolds she had so tenderly cared for. '' Children see the world far more simplistic than adults. Lizabeth says she no longer saw Miss Lottie as a witch, but just an old woman who tried to cover up the ugliness of her life with the beauty of marigolds. This was the first time she felt compassion and remorse for her actions. Lizabeth then develops the ability to distinguish what is right from wrong, and is able to feel proud when she does the right thing, as well as ashamed when she does not.
Richardson’s judgmental attitude toward Mia. For instance, as Mia arrives at Mrs. Richardson’s home, she surveys Mia and takes note of her outfit and looks. The author says, “Mrs. Richardson tipped her head to one side and studied her tenant. Hair, as always, unkempt atop her head. A loose white button-down untucked over jeans.
Dill and Scout go to school. It is Scout’s first day of school and her teacher is Miss Caroline. Miss Caroline tells Scout to read and she feels useless, insecure since she can read and since the majority of the class is repeating the grade Miss Caroline doesn’t know what to do. Miss Caroline picks on Scout
A dedicated teacher could provide Daugherty a stress relieved school night and pleasing meetings with the school. To aid Paul Daugherty in his struggles, a dedicated teacher for his daughter, Jillian, would allow Daugherty a school night full of joy and accomplishment. Specifically, Daugherty’s frustration appears when Jillian loses a book or does not bring a book home from school, through extreme exaggeration, Daugherty expresses, ”On nights when the homework careened off track, I could lose touch with Jillian’s guts and determination. I’d fall down the rabbit hole and into despair” (136).
Lizabeth then continues towards Miss Lottie’s house and rips up all her flowers she had been taking great care of. Lizabeth is greatly flawed by hearing her dad sobbing and her parents talking about the struggles they had as a family. Lizabeth then took out her anger on Miss. Lottie’s flowers because they were standing perfectly fine. Lizabeth had woken up to Miss.
As she grows into womanhood, Lizabeth starts to see past the mask of innocence that has shrouded her perspective for so long, and she even “flinched” at the realization of how she has harmed Miss Lottie, displaying her newfound empathy. As Lizabeth unintentionally commences her journey away from innocence and towards understanding, she grows closer to maturity, expressing that these factors are what initiate this growth. When Lizabeth eventually recalls her story as an adult, she looks back to see her loss of innocence and to
First, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters notice an errant quilt patch in an otherwise beautiful quilt. The women notice how lovely the other quilts are and how the other rough-looking patch stands out: “all the rest of them had been so
In the end, he came out the other side as the villain instead of the hero as he originally thought. Leiningen is the antihero of “Leiningen Versus the Ants” due to his selfish and egotistical personality, mass genocide of the ants and the morbid act of putting 400 innocent peons in mortal danger. At the beginning of the short story Leiningen is warned that he should leave before the ants arrive, yet instead he decides to stay because he knew the ants could never defeat him. This shows that Leiningen is full of himself and very arrogant. Later on, Leiningen sends the women and children across the river to keep them out of the
Peter’s intuition is beginning to tell her that Minnie wasn’t treated right. The court attorney walks in the room, and sees the bird cage but no bird. If he sees the bird, he finds the proof. This is the start of Mrs. Peter’s rebellion. The attorney asks if the bird has flown, and Mrs. Hale tells him the cat got it.
She loved the Harling children as her own. She served Jim’s grandparents as if she was their bondservant. Whatever she did, she did wholeheartedly, tending the seeds of love and hope she had planted. And this did not fail her, for at long last she harvested the love, admiration, and respect of everyone around
When it comes to battle many would rather avoid it all together and that is just what Little-face did. Little-face had no children and her husband out looking for bison so she was able to lay in her lodge go get some rest. As she was about to drift asleep she heard a small voice calling out to her. She looked around to find a small mouse that wished to speak with her.
Minnie’s quilt, the dead bird and its cage, and the kitchen show that living in a man’s world is not easy. In the end, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale recognize that they too have experienced the same loneliness and mistreatment that led Mrs. Wright to murder her husband. The men don't value the women in this story and they don't see them as being very intelligent either. It is for this reason “A jury of her peers” is created. Peers being the women themselves as they stand up, united against the subjugation they have all experienced.
People in the town have Indians portrayed as extremely superstitious, drunks, and lazy individuals, however; this just not true. One character, Wesley Hayden has an opinion on native Americans, “Nevertheless, he believed Indians, with only a few exceptions, were ignorant, lazy, superstitious, and irresponsible”(33). Maire Little Soldier defines the odds of all those negative aspects said of Native Americans. She is responsible of David along with other things around the Haydens’ house and is a hard worker. However, Wes is still reluctant to have Marie as a Native American gain justice.
The men of the group, much like John in “The Yellow Wallpaper,” consider themselves more capable than the women and refuse to consider Mrs. Wright as anything other than irrational. The men leave the women to their “trifles” on the first floor, where they discover a broken bird cage, and the bird’s body, broken, carefully wrapped in a small, decorative box. They realize that Mr. Wright had wrung the neck of his wife’s beloved bird and broken its cage. Mrs. Wright, once known for her cheerfulness and beautiful singing, she stopped singing when she encountered Mr. Wright. Just like he did with the bird, Mr. Wright choked the life out of his wife until, finally, Mrs. Wright literally choked the life out of her husband.
The women began to pity Mrs. Wright as they knew her before she married to Mr. Wright. The females felt pity, where the men just accessed the situation at hand. After the women examine the empty bird cage they remember the way that Mrs. Wright use to sing and compared her to her former self as Minnie Foster. “Trifles,” introduced the masculinity here from the Sheriff’s side instantly putting his instinct into saying that there was a murder that happened at the farmhouse, was caused by Mrs. Wright without any hesitation. He didn’t look into the sadness, or let the depressing home get to him as much as what his intentions and his well-being come into play before his