ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Omniscience And Free Will

498 Words2 Pages

The concept of free will versus a God who knows everything has been a topic of philosophical debate for centuries. Some people believe that free will and omniscience are incompatible, while others argue that the two can coexist (Clarke, 2003). In this paper, I will examine the ramifications of these two concepts and their implications for the existence of God, moral responsibility, and the meaning of life.
One of the central arguments against the coexistence of free will and omniscience is that if God knows everything, including all of our choices and actions, then our choices are determined and not truly free (Craig, 2008). This idea is rooted in the principle of determinism, which states that every event, including human choices, is determined …show more content…

If our choices are predetermined, then we cannot be held responsible for our actions, as we have no control over them. This argument has led many to conclude that if God is omniscient, then free will is an illusion, and moral responsibility is untenable.
However, proponents of the compatibility of free will and omniscience argue that God's knowledge of the future does not necessarily determine it. Instead, they believe that God's knowledge of the future is compatible with our ability to make free choices. According to this view, God knows what we will do in the future because he knows all possible outcomes, but He does not cause us to make a particular choice. Our choices are still freely made, and we are still responsible for them (Craig, 2008).
Another argument against the coexistence of free will and omniscience is that if God knows everything, then the future is fixed, and there is no real possibility for change or growth. This view holds that if God already knows what we will do, then our lives have no real purpose or meaning, as everything is

Show More
Related

  • Chapter Summary: Mathematics Through The Eyes Of Faith

    1351 Words  | 6 Pages

    Equally as important as the previous subject, Chance in chapter five, is particularly imperative because it mentions deep theological and philosophical cases such as: case for theistic determinism as well as a case for theistic nondeterminism. The authors evenly divide the explanation of both the theists and non-theists in separate pages to distinguish the differences between them, including some examples and figures. Based on the argument between the two cases, the determinist insists and argues that God is the highest power of this universe, and therefore excludes ontological doubt. In comparison, the non-determinist believes that God has created the physical universe with a freedom to choose and a life of its

    Read More

  • Jamestown Colony Compare And Contrast

    1176 Words  | 5 Pages

    Predestination is described as when a person is born, their whole life is already determined. In example, god made you and decided what will happen to you and when it would happen. He also decided when it is that you would die and exactly how you will die. “...in a mighty storm, a lusty young man called John Howland, coming upon some occasion above the gratings was, with a seel of the ship, thrown into sea: but it pleased God that he caught hold of the topsail halyards which hung overboard and ran out at length. Yet he held his hold till he was with a boat hook and other means got into the ship again and his life saved.”

    Read More

  • The Theories And Arguments Of Roderick Chisholm And Harry Frankfurt

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, how does God play into this argument? Because He is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent – how does that reconcile with our free will? One of the ways that free will and God’s omniscience coexist is through our ability to sin. As human beings, we are sinful.

    Read More

  • Clark H. Pinnock's Most Moved Mover

    1118 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his book Most Moved Mover, Clark H. Pinnock explains his reasoning for believing in an open God. That is, Pinnock argues for the existence of a God of Christianity that does not determine the future in order to allow for the free will of creatures. Pinnock gives several arguments for the viability of his position by utilizing several sections of scripture to advocate for a more authentic understanding of the God that is revealed via the Bible. Furthermore, Pinnock argues from commonly held understandings of the Doctrine of God by claiming that the problems associated with present doctrine are best solved via the conceptual picture of a God that limits His foreknowledge. By doing this, we, therefore, solve issues related to theodicy in some way and free-will in some ways.

    Read More

  • Essay On Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie

    826 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Do you see this son, it’s all madness out there. I just don’t understand why God lets this happens.” As my mother watches the 11 pm news on a cold rainy night, most of the coverage is about evil acts and how it’s affecting the community of Los Angles. Thus, it raises the question of why a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent would allow evil and suffering to exist in the world. This paper explores the argument of the problem of evil conflicts with the existence of God from two different points of view, criticism of one point of view, and evaluation of the argument.

    Read More

  • How Does Peter Van Inwagen Respond To The Problem Of Evil

    1706 Words  | 7 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to explore Peter Van Inwagen’s take on Free Will, as well as how he uses it to respond to The Problem of Evil. It will also cover objections to his Free Will Defense and his responses to them as well as my own personal responses. The Problem of Evil is the age old argument that since there are so many horrendous evils and cruelties happening in the world, God cannot exist. This is because God is a morally perfect and omnipotent being, and because he is good, he could never allow the horrors of the world come into play.

    Read More

  • A Lesson Before Dying Literary Analysis

    1233 Words  | 5 Pages

    Are we able to control our destiny or the outside forces? There are very good arguments about that but at the end of the day, I feel like we don’t control what happens to use in the future. Especially after I read the book, “A Lesson Before Dying”. Jefferson, the main character, was executed for something he didn't even do. He had a future and it was all gone due to what he couldn't control.

    Read More

  • Adams Arguments On The Deductive Problem Of Evil

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    The deductive problem of evil defines omnipotence as having no bounds to power and being all-good as having the will to prevent and stop any evil that one possibly can. Furthermore, Adams presents how much this problem is amplified when considering horrendous evils that would push the average person to “doubt the positive meaning of their lives”(Adams 300). Adams acknowledges that this definition of God’s qualities alongside the definition of horrendous evils hinders the existence of the Christian God. God is one who is supposed to hold love for all of his creations, but allowing for his creations to suffer needlessly doesn’t align with this love. This problem causes people to question not only God’s love for them but also God’s reasoning in their suffering and their living.

    Read More

  • The Omnipotence Argument Against Landau

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    But God is omnipotent. Conclusion: Therefore, God does not command an act because it is moral. Landau is wrong.” The omnipotence argument against Landau is valid because the conclusion follows from the premises and the conclusion is not false.

    Read More

  • Socrates And Euthyphro's Argument Analysis

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Theorists opposing this argument hold that morality is not dependent on the will of God. These theorists limit God’s omnipotence is stating clearly that he cannot make what is wrong, right. The theorists then suggest that God has to bend His will to conform to what is right. They hold that God wills what is morally right because it is right. In this argument, I take the stand that morality is what God wills it to

    Read More

  • Problem Of Evil Mackie Analysis

    1089 Words  | 5 Pages

    The existence of God has been presented by a multitude of philosophers. However, this has led to profound criticism and arguments of God’s inexistence. The strongest argument in contradiction to God’s existence is the Problem of Evil, presented by J.L Mackie. In this paper, I aim to describe the problem of evil, analyse the objection of the Paradox of Omnipotence and provide rebuttals to this objection. Thus, highlighting my support for Mackie’s Problem of evil.

    Read More

  • Ethos Pathos Logos

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before we're born, our lives are foretold. We're woven through puzzles until we're placed correctly, and we wait till our time comes. Our choices, actions, and beliefs are predicted by the Gods. Our blueprints are engraved in stone -- destined to follow their paths perfectly. Every step is planned, and every future is known.

    Read More

  • Fate In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    Failures and successes in life have led many people to believe that destiny plays a role in one's future life outcome. Some say destiny, the “hidden power believed to control what will happen in the future”, is unchangeable; fate has already decided how one will live their life. Although in some cases this may be true, one is able to change their destiny by the deeds and actions they commit during their lifetime. Many people disregard the idea that actions play a large role in forming one's future.

    Read More

  • Free Will Theodicy Essay

    816 Words  | 4 Pages

    Some philosophers argue that if God exists, holds power, and has the desire to avert evil, then evil wouldn’t exist. In an attempt to solve this issue, other philosophers have acknowledged that the free will theodicy provides a sufficient solution to the problem of evil. However, in rebuttal, I argue that the free will theodicy does not provide an extensive solution for the problem of evil.

    Read More

  • St. Augustine On Free Will

    1088 Words  | 5 Pages

    Humans have free will, but God knows their fate. In Book V of the City of God, Saint Augustine discusses the matter of fate and free will pertaining to having a relationship with God. Within that section of the text he makes many statements about how humans have the freedom to make their own choices, but God ultimately knows the outcome. Logically, this make sense. If God created everything, then this would mean He has created everything in the past, present and future.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Omniscience And Free Will

Open Document