Stephen King, one of the many famous movie makers and book writers once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different”. However, when it comes to the oranges, the bright-colored fruit usually tastes better. Truly, many people have different opinions, but the movie is definitely better. This giant, white void will explain the many differences between Raisin in the sun’s book and movie, and focus on the great traits of the movie.
The book and the movie are both really interesting but one is better than the other. The movie is both funny and action packed but the book is more detailed. So I enjoyed the book more. The film forgot a lot of characters and changed many scenes and it really frustrated me. Also in the book you can see more character development.
Although the movie did have some interesting additions and removals, the book was far more appealing to a general audience than the movie. One of the first reasons for why the book is better than the movie is because of the characters. In the movie, they removed Yitzchak and Reuven. These are very important characters in the story. They even replaced Gitl with Aunt Mina, who did not play as big of a role compared to Gitl’s.
Think about this. Are you interested in a book that can tear you up? That can make you look at yourself and say “Wow, Thank god I’m not them.” Well, the Outsiders is the perfect book for that. Not only is the book great, they made a movie of it and was exceptionally good too, thanks to Francis Ford Coppola for directing it. This book is originally called the Outsiders, where there are groups of people in the hood that stand tall next to their labels.
The different versions, although, also have many similarities. Overall, the movie was better than the play because it went into more depth and detail into Anne’s feelings. This movie was a real eye opener to what Jews had to experience during the reign of the Nazi
The book has more eventful scenes, some scenes more valuable than others. I feel like students will find more things to connect to in real life situations from reading the book than viewing the movie. “There are a million ways for the movie to go wrong” (The Atlantic). That 's why i believe movie makers should really pay attention to details in the book and incorporate it into the movie to make it more successful. I absolutely love the book.
I could watch these movies over and over again and wouldn’t get tired of seeing it. If I was going through the tv guide I would immediately choose “Step Brothers”. At times during the movie the relationships between the main characters are not as great as they were at the beginning of the movie, but always get resolved at the end. The similarities that these two movies share is that the two main actors of the movie are not the brightest and do funny things, in character. When these actors are not in character they are very different, they are smart and comedic at the same time.
I like the movie more because I can picture things more. Also, the book goes more in depth than the movie when they’re talking about the characters feeling. I also like the book more because it’s in first person point of view with Katniss’s thoughts. As you can see there are a lot of similarities and differences in the Hunger Games book and between the Hunger Games film. All in all there are more similarities than
Although no movie based on a book is fully satisfactory, it is always amusing to watch the storyline in a different light. Jenn Doll, from The Atlantic, explains that “Because a criticism of how it should have been -- and almost always plays out better in our minds -- is in some ways part of the fun of seeing the movie made from a book we love” (Doll). It is an exciting experience to anticipate what we know already in our minds, to be projected into the real world. Overall, the book is a thrilling read, the movie is a thrilling visual, but nothing would ever beat the books complexity of feelings and
Two characters in the novel face this stereotype. Calpurnia a cook for the Finch family is the first character. Aunt Alexandra attempts to get rid of Calpurnia just because her skin tone is black. The other example is Tom Robinson, he is stereotyped this way because he is being accused for raping Mayella Ewell. During the court case Tom Robinson is hated by most of the white people in Maycomb except for the Finch’s because they know what fairness is like.
It also didn’t happen in the book so I don’t see a reason for it. Now you know why the book and movie of Ender’s Game are so different and why the book is better. The movie adds unnecessary parts to it like ender when Ender had gotten tranquilized. It takes out many important parts in the movie like when Ender goes to salamander army. It even uses some important parts, but switches important things like dialogue, action, and even points of time.
In my opinion, Hatchet does a better job explaining the story way more effectively than the movie “A Cry In The Wild”. Now, I do have some reasoning behind my opinion. What you thought I was going to explain?! To begin with, there are some phenomenal imagery, details, and foreshadowing in the book rather than in the movie. For example, the book shows what Brian is seeing and reacting during the pilot’s heart attack.