Macedon soldiers no longer did want to fight against unfamiliar enemies in unknown territories. Later on Persian government executives managed providences of the new empire more badly. In addition to them, when we examine Alexander’s whole life, the effects of Persian culture and his father’s policies constitute important reasons so that he held the weddings.
The period between the end of the Civil War and the Great Depression had many notable achievements such as western expansion and the Reconstruction Era. However it was also a time period in which many minority groups were fairly disappointed in the American government. The Reconstruction Amendments had many holes not making it effective enough, and with more expansion to the West came more extreme racism towards Native Americans. It is clear that there were attempts to change America for all the people’s freedom, but there are still many flaws those changes possess. Because of that, I find myself in the middle of the debate about who benefited most from this time period.
There are both similarities and differences. One of the similarities is the fact that after their reign, Greece and Rome crashed. When Lucullus was in the reign, Rome was in destempered state, so that civil wars were on their way. That mainly caused constitutional change after Lucullus died. Cimon, on the other hand, had more power in his hands when he was leading the country.
“As we all know the Roman Empire, big empires go down if the borders are not well-protected”- (Mark Rutte). This quote was chosen because it says that even big empires go down if they are not well protected. One example of this was The Roman Empire, it was a big empire and was the most extensive political and social structured in western civilization, but since they weren´t well protected it fell. The Ancient Roman Army is different from the Roman´s Army nowadays. One example of this is the Roman Army, back then they weren’t allowed to marry while they were serving the army, and nowadays they are free to marry and free to have their own rights.
While on the other hand the Allied Forces had powerful allies such as the USA which could contribute greater resources of men and materials. Furthermore, the British had put in place a Naval Blockade prevent the passing of cargo of any ships that attempted to pass through, this was very effective and starved much of Germany’s population. Lastly, Germany’s two front with Russia greatly weakened German forces and had larger repercussions later on. Although these are all important causes, the most factor that
Both the empire started in the same way and ended up in a similar way. Both empires were once powerful under one well-educated emperor. After the death of that emperor, internal conflicts aroused, which led to the civil war. This became an advantage for the external opportunist that finally led the collapse of both the empire. Concisely, both empires collapsed because of internal conflicts and external pressure.
The decline and fall of the Roman Empire in the West between A.D. 197 and A.D. 476 There have been many theories as to what caused the decline and eventual fall of the great Roman Empire in the West between A.D. 197 and A.D. 476. Political, military and economic issues were mainly responsible for the fall of Rome in the West. There is strong proof that these were the three main causes. To expand on political problems, things such as corruption were an enormous contributing factor as well as lack of strong leadership. Military issues were those of the problematic situation of expanding borders, barbarian knowledge of military tactics, and the resulting end in loss of control over the Empire.
They are definitely “great characters” as they are the protagonist in books that have been regarded as great pieces of literature for many centuries, but their ambitions materialised in monstrous acts, meaning the principles that lead them to ruin were equally atrocious. It can be proposed that the principle is ambition. Ambition is a virtue, yet an ambition to be more powerful, (i.e. to rule a country or create life) might have negative consequences because power is known to corrupt. This means that power can corrupt what were initially the most honest ambitions, causing them to obligate to violence bringing them only sadness and greed when their ambitions are realised.
Alexander defeated Darius and conquered Persia and a great number of other regions. However, after his death a great state collapsed and different polises again started the war in order to obtain dominance and dictate its rules. This fact became one of the main reasons of the collapse of Ancient Greece. It was still very strong and influential. Additionally, Greece
Also, the discovery of the new world and ways affected the economy of the Ottoman Empire and weaken its economy. Also, French revolution was another important and strong cause behind the fall of the Ottoman
They both fell from similar reasons although there was some differences. One similarity in Han China and Rome was that they were invaded constantly. The Han were invaded by the Xiongnu, the Kazakhs, and Mongols. Emperors in Han china offered the Xiongnu many items in return for peace but they didn 't have enough to pay everyone!Eventually the Han ended the Xiongnu but it came at a price. They had little money left over which put the government into turmoil.
The origin of the plan also had a lot of political foes in the Congress since it was seen as being too liberal for the conservatives and also at the same time too conservative for the liberals. At the same time, the administration was faced with several domestic scandals as well as foreign-policy crises that were a distraction and, therefore, damaging the efforts of lobbying for the reform. The whole reform subsequently hit a deadlock when the administration ran into a political quagmire, and a lack of a fallback strategy meant everything fell apart. In most cases public policy “ are made by well-intentioned political leaders forced into so many compromises that the resulting policy bears little resemblance to the original proposal” (Cochran & Malone, 2010, p.23). But it was not only the Clinton administration failed in its attempt to pass the bill with previous presidents also witnessing the failures including Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and Richard Nixon.
The fall of the Roman Empire in Western Europe can undeniably be accredited to the radical shifts in the Empire’s military as well as the belligerent and selfish policies of the Imperial court. From tragic reforms to faltering loyalties, the legions of the 4th and 5th centuries were dichotomies of the ironclad soldiers that conquered Europe; nor were the Emperor and Senate the ideal governing system that had maintained an Empire for centuries. The combination of external and internal pressures that completely changed the face of Rome’s legions also attributed to her eventual collapse in the West. The armies that once claimed the world from Spain to Syria and Britain to Egypt were transformed into sub-par soldiers. This occurred at a time of
Besides the goths, there were many reasons western Rome fell, from crippling taxation, military failures to climate change and natural disaster. Government corruption and political instability were also major factors of the fall of western Rome. The goths attacked Rome when they were weak, while their army was weak, whilst the government was corrupted and Rome was focusing on itself and not on the threat of the goths. The Roman Empire is argued to have fell in 476 AD, due to the Eastern Empire still hadn’t fell until 476