Compare And Contrast Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson

581 Words3 Pages

Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were both progressive presidents, but their approaches to regulating and controlling big business in the United States differed. President Roosevelt felt that big business were not truly villainous, for they were part of the 20th century playing a big part in the everyday American life. He felt that the commander in chief should be over the legislative action towards the reform. He asserted that the government should regulate the big businesses and trust to ensure that they did not misuse their power. Roosevelt filed suit against the largest trusts in order to make an example of what would happen if they started to misuse their power. Roosevelt decided file suit against the biggest of the time, J.P. Morgan’s Northern Securities Holding Company. The government won the lawsuit. This spread like a wildfire, the trusts could accept the regulations put forth by the government or be sued. As a result of the court cases the Hepburn Act was set under way. This act fortified power held by the Interstate Commerce Commission, leaving them with more control over the railroads. It also designated …show more content…

This would entail stepping into disputes between the labor and management groups. The 1902 coal strike was a great example of when he stepped in to mediate. The ongoing dispute jeopardized the economy of the nation, and the wellbeing of the people. This was so important to the people, because they relied on this coal for the ability to heat their homes, and its use in many other entities. During this time, he threatened to take control of the mines, if the labor leaders and mine owners could not reach an agreement. This threat accelerated the compromisation of the two groups. For him, the government should make the disputes equal

Open Document