Compare And Contrast SDLC, JAD And RAD

Compare and Contrast SDLC, JAD and RAD There are several approaches a company can undertake in order to develop systems that would provide for proper information to be used in any decision-making process essential in meeting the demands and needs of their customer base. The most traditional of these methodologies would be SDLC or Systems Development Life Cycle and two other approaches worth mentioning would be JAD or Joint Application Design and the RAD or Rapid Application Design. Regardless of the methodology chosen, the most important aspect that a company must consider would be documentation and the adherence to the set plan (Rouse, 2009). Systems Development Life Cycle is a methodology that employs six, highly-structured steps which include the definition of project objectives, systems study, design development, programming, installation, and post-implementation or monitoring. From the enumeration of the steps, one can note that this method covers the whole systems development process from the initial feasibility study down to the monitoring of the completed system. This type of systems development methodology is adapted by large-scale industry projects and development spans well over a year. Since the steps are highly structured, this methodology is relied upon for its standardized and repeatable processes and procedures. Another advantage would be

Also, both the technical aspects of the systems plus the organization’s social aspects must be considered and integrated when choosing the type of approach to use. Each methodology is unique and has its own sets of advantages and disadvantages to be considered. Choosing just one approach or a hybrid of approaches is dependent on the nature of the business, its current processes and the organization as a whole in order to find the right fit for the system to be