Everyone has a different view on life, some cherish and crave the materialistic objects whereas some people focus more on happiness and finding themselves. In the book Siddhartha by Herman Hesse and the movie Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer the characters Siddhartha and Chris McCandless differ in the sense of their journeys to enlightenment, but they are also alike because they share similar ideas and values. Chris and Siddhartha meet many friends along their journeys that teach them valuable lessons, but they also take different approaches on their paths. Chris and Siddhartha have a lot in common because of their view on happiness. They both meet a lot of friends during their journey that seem very alike. These friends help Siddhartha and …show more content…
Chris and Siddhartha are both dead set on their journeys so they end up leaving their friends behind, but never forget the lessons they taught them. Both of them start their journeys by eliminating all materials in order for them to focus completely on the paths they want to take, Chris burns and donates his money and leaves his family behind, Siddhartha also leaves his wealthy family behind. Chris’s main hate is money, not necessarily all materials like Siddhartha. He does keep some of his belongings, just mostly eliminates money. In Siddhartha, the character Govinda plays a large role in Siddhartha’s life, he is his best friend and he is extremely loyal to Siddhartha. “As with benumbed legs, he slowly left the still sleeping town at daybreak, a crouching shadow emerged from the last hut and joined the pilgrim. It was Govinda.”(Siddhartha, pg.12). This quote really exemplifies Govinda’s loyalty to …show more content…
At the end of each story both characters come to their own conclusions about what makes them happy. Their conclusions are different because they fulfil them separately and it is what makes them personally happy. “Happiness is only real when shared.” (Chris, Into the Wild). Chris comes to the conclusion that he can only be happy when he shares his happiness. Chris realized this too late as he was dying in Alaska. Chris had wanted to be in Alaska so badly, but it wasn’t what he thought. As Chris was dying he remembered all of the people in his life and how they impacted him and made his life better. He realized that he was at his happiest point with all these friends he made. While he was in Alaska, a place he thought would fulfil him he felt isolated and was incapable of survival. “During deep meditation it is possible to dispel time, to see simultaneously all the past, present and future, and then everything is good, everything is perfect, everything is Brahman.” (Siddhartha, pg.116). This quote is Siddhartha talking to Govinda and explaining to him his newfound sense of peace. Siddhartha has become content with his life and has achieved what he was looking for. This is different than Chris’s idea of enlightenment because Siddhartha believes that enlightenment is having a harmonious relationship with the world and with nature. Chris’s sense of enlightenment is towards spending
Chris believed that life with everyone slaving away wasn’t a good thing. He even tried to get others to follow this way of thinking. In a letter to Ron, Chris tried convincing him to do what he did and live a full life of adventure. “The joy of life comes from our encounters and new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day having a different sun” (56). Chris believed no one should just waste their lives and should live to the fullest.
Chris McCandless showed one of mankind’s most primal attractions: the attraction to danger, and how deadly it can be to follow it to the extremes. More than half of his short life seemed to have been spent chasing the final adventure; the best adventure he could possibly have. His attraction to danger started at a very young age and stayed with him till death. Chris also told many people of his fear of water because of Mexico; which was caused when he took an aluminum canoe into the ocean which is very dangerous. Also his views about the law and the future showed his pull to the adventurous and dangerous.
As the fourth section progresses we are introduced to a variety of characteristics that define a rebel. My personal take was that you know you are truly rebel when you cannot be easily defined by stereotypes of a rebel. In addition, a rebellious person may rebel against multiple ideals but in rebelling against those ideals they support different ideals. Chris McCandless is a paragon of a rebel seen in his rebellion against societal norms but also his rebellion against characteristics of individuals that rebel against societal norms.
Each individual embarks on his or her own hero’s journey in life, some finding peace and enlightenment while others suffer greatly. In Hermann Hesse’s novel Siddhartha, the author slowly shows Siddhartha’s path towards finding the self and enlightenment through conflict and resolution. Finding himself is difficult, but once he does, Siddhartha is released from sorrow and depression, which finally enables him to reach enlightenment and peace. Hesse portrays Siddhartha’s spiritual hero’s journey by using unique conflicts to reveal his true self through independence, mindfulness, and responsibility.
Suddenly, there was not past, present or future. Time became eternal when he looked into the river; “it is everywhere and nowhere”. There were no regrets of the past, just living in the now was sufficient. Also, another secret was equality. Travelers could connect to Siddhartha and the ferryman when on board; they connected to each other as they shared stories, and seek advice from the ferrymen.
Chris’s letter to Ron Franz espouses a number of philosophies that Chris believes in. The first part of Chris’s philosophy is to do things boldly that one may not have thought of doing previously. He also encourages people to change their situation so they can be happier in life. The fundamental basis of his philosophy is that the passion for adventure and the acceptance of trying new things is what brings joy to life. As he tells Mr. Franz, “Don’t settle down and sit in one place.
Kevin Sun Mrs. Cohen English 2CP --D February 22, 2018 Another Perspective The film Into the Wild is based on the life of Chris McCandless, a young man who rejected the consumerist society of America in order to live a more simple life. Through his travels, Chris carried essays by Transcendentalist philosophers Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, suggesting that McCandless is impacted by Transcendentalist ideals. Two key tenets of Transcendentalism that clearly influenced McCandless’ choices are the value of simplicity and the importance of self-reliance.
Into the Wild tells the story of Chris McCandless, a young man who embarked on an adventure across the U.S. Chris lived for adventure, and sadly met his demise in the Alaskan wilderness. Chris’ death brought about a large debate as to whether Chris was insane or simply idealistic. Krakauer wrote Into the Wild to prove Chris’ sanity and soundly completes that task by using rhetorical devices to persuade his audience. Throughout the book, Krakauer uses ethos to develop Chris’ credibility by providing examples of people who are similar to him. For example, Krakauer provides multiple examples of people who were very similar to Chris, such as Everett Ruess.
He discovered what he had been looking for in Alaska which was the key to his happiness, which ended up being strong relationships, and in Chris’s case one with his
Throughout chapters 8 and 9, the author showed his bias towards Chris McCandless, which is an act of defiance to his position as an objective journalist, when he attempted to alter the readers’ negative point of view towards Chris by the introduction of different people who had similar experiences and characteristics as him and then making comparison. After reading the previous chapters, the readers have already made their own judgement on Chris, which are probably mostly negative. To address this issue, Krakauer initiates chapter 8 by introducing negative comments and mails not only about Chris but also to him, the author. These will serve as an argument that he will later attempt to disprove while at the same time, still informing the readers about what makes Chris special and unique.
Despite Krakauer 's honorable attempts to portray Chris as someone who is relatable and should be pitied, Chris is portrayed as careless and inconsiderate. Krakauer 's biased diction end up showing Chris as stupid and egotistical. In the beginning Krakauer starts off make Chris a relatable person however after the first few pages Krakauer turns Chris into a superficial rich entitled person who thought he was able to do anything without repercussion. There are many instances where Krakauer reveals Chris as such. Chris may have been innocent in his ideals but that was his mistake, “For most of the sixteen-week ordeal…McCandless more than held his own.
Jon Krakauer writes, “McCandless Didn’t conform particularly well to the bush-casualty stereotype. Although he was rash, untutored in the ways of the backcountry, and incautious to the point of foolhardiness, he wasn’t incompetent - he wouldn’t have lasted 113 days if he were. And he wasn’t a nutcase, he wasn’t a sociopath, he wasn’t and outcast. McCandless was something else - although precisely what is hard to say. A pilgrim perhaps.”
Any individual lives their life with many different types of influences, coming from both objects and people. In Hermann Hesse’s novel Siddhartha, a man unknowingly travels down the path of enlightenment. The man known as Siddhartha travels to seek the knowledge he longs for and encounters multiple influences along the way. These influences play an important role in the novel for him. Some of the influences in Siddhartha’s life include Kamala, his son, and the river since they help him to understand what he seeks and are the main reasons for him achieving enlightenment.
Up to this point, “Teaching” is expounding a certain way of life to other people in hopes that they will reach the same “enlightenment”. For example, the samanas “teach” their people to live a certain lifestyle that is compared to the life of a drunk—finding temporary relief from life’s issues, but waking up and facing the same problems all over again. (pg 16) Siddhartha eventually becomes “weary and distrustful” (pg 21) of this and breaks away from these unrewarding “teachings”, while Govinda is taken by each one. Each time he is faced with a new “Teaching”, he practices exactly what is taught, intently.
And Herman Hesse shows this by showing their trust for each other. When Siddhartha first leaves home he experiences many trials and tribulations From being a Samana, to going to the city, to almost committing suicide. Who was always there? The Ferryman. Siddhartha trusts him almost like a father, he understands all that he has gone through.