Compare And Contrast The American Revolution And French Revolution

Perhaps two of the most pivotal rebellions in western history are the ones fought in France and the The United States. At their cores the revolutions involved the fundaments of Enlightenment culture, equality, natural rights, and Montesquieu’s concept of checks and balances between the government and the governed. There are, however, key differences in the handling and outcomes of the revolutions. Both regimes were oppressive, both populaces were repressed and felt the time for a noble struggle was impending. In short both nations sought to be free from the near, or perceived, absolute rule of an unelected leader.

The American Revolution set the background for the modern nation state as well as molding the modern Army. Both countries have many differences and similarities, ranging from the individuals fighting these wars to tactics and strategies they used to win. These countries shared the same idea of freedom and independence, the difference is they used different methods of accomplishing this goal. It’s difficult to pin point which country chose the best method, but we compare some of the facts and take a deeper look as to what was transpiring in both of these Revolutions. In the 18th Century the main problem the Army had was manpower.

The French Revolution established abstract universalistic principles based on a responsibility to human rights, while the Americans preferred to focus on immediate problem-solving and rights (to land they took from the natives.) The French are more conservative in this sense, since the decisions they take are still informed by a single common vision for the long-term good. While France’s focus has not changed, America’s destiny is now shaped by anonymous market forces, public relations specialists, lobbyists, investors, a vastly richer, more influential corporate overclass directly implicated in politics,

Revolutionary ideas spread and influenced the the Latin America society. Organized with a hierarchal structure, Latin citizens were governed by the peninsulares but contained a huge class of creoles. Creoles were content with their benefits from plantations, but desired political dominance over the peninsulares. Similar to the United States, they chose the political independence route which was an easier and more peaceful solution. This independence led to the establishment of creole dominated republics.

Revisionists were critics to the Marxist ideals and had a slightly different take on the events of the French Revolution, which they believed to have nothing to do with a bourgeois revolution. The revisionist countered the Marxist stating that class struggle had little to do with the breakout of the war and nothing to do with expanding capitalism. Cobban Taylor had been a revisionist theorist whose views were highly securitized by the French Marxist historians. They attempted to downplay the severity of the French Revolution and denying the events their rightful place in modern history.

The French Revolution was the outcome of several sensitive issues which were indigestible by the people of France with the passage of time. There was a time when people wanted a kind of renaissance in their lives but could not advocate their plight without the encouragement and boost and this was the time around 18th century when the writings of Voltaire came as an enlightenment and courage and boost for their lives to be looked upon not by the others but by themselves first. Hence, this was the influence of Voltaire’s words stuffed with truth, wisdom , and light to see the life with the own perspectives and self when people with their combined will stood together for a magnificent revolution called as French revolution.

After three centuries of colonial rule, Spanish and Portuguese America got independence. Between 1808 and 1826 all of Latin America except the Spanish colonies of Cuba and Puerto Rico remained under Spanish rule. This was the result of a combination of long-building tensions in colonial rule and a series of external events. The reforms imposed by the Spanish in the 18th century provoked great instability in the relations between the rulers and their colonial subjects in the Americas. Many Creoles felt Bourbon policy to be an unfair attack on their wealth, political power, and social status.

Introduction The French Revolution has played a key role in shaping the future not only of France but also of the modern Western world. It has been an event full of political and social significance since with it the transition from the old political and economic system, and consequently social, to a new modern system was accomplished, leading thus Europe towards a new era. However, the historiography of the French Revolution is intricate and in order to understand each event, any scholar or student has to deal with several series of challenges. Indeed, the different opinions and interpretations about its causes and its consequences proposed by historians, make the French Revolution one of the most discussed historical subject of the modern history.

the power form of the majority. He believed that majority of equals leads to the creation of people abusing their powers. Lastly, as the Tocqueville’s likes, and dislikes were mentioned other great philosophers such as Rousseau of those times had a say on the equality in a country. The great philosopher Rousseau was a philosophical thinker who premise was on the collectivism of the majority than on an individual in a community. His social contract was designed for people to give away their rights for an exchange of governmental protection.

The French Revolution of 1848 The French revolution of 1848 was, a groundbreaking war between then French people and their government. The people of France had enough and joined together, and attempted to overthrow the government. The system of the French government did not function in the best interest of the French citizens because of the economic crisis and the political differences between the upper and lower class.