His rebellion shows that his character is smart, strong and prefect, but also eaten up by power, he didn’t think before he went to the studio and that led him to getting shot. His queen to was shot because of this, but his rebellion was for everyone’s freedom, their real freedom. In all honesty there should be another story where a different person comes that does this but thinks before he does. Maybe someday this story can be continued, but who can say it will, it could be said that what happens in the story will happen in 2081. so was his rebellion good or bad, honestly its your, the readers decision on that. In a society like in 2081, most people wouldn’t find it very acceptable, they want to be the best they can possibly be but in 2081 you can’t, you can’t be creative at all so Harrisons rebellion is very
He realized that the path towards victory was not as exuberant as he had imagined and that he had to be willing to give up his life if necessary. This major difference between his expectations for the war and the reality caused him to temporarily view the goal as trivial and immaterial, but a trip to his hometown would change this
This proves to be significant because this shows the lengths that Ronnie is willing to go to in order to keep his friend safe. Withholding information from the police about a murder can make you an accessory to the crime, despite knowing this he was willing to lie and possibly endanger himself. Obstructing justice so that your friend can be safe is a very difficult decision to make, as it affects more than just you. The parents of Gene Hanlon would be devastated to not know how their son died, the police will have spent lots of their time and money on a case that only two people truly understand how it unfolded. The soldier in the story “Gregory” also made many sacrifices for his friend, but in a much more subtle way.
In regards to ethical and moral decisions for those who commit crimes, there are multiple factors that can determine what the most appropriate verdict should be. In scenario three, a man has been convicted of armed robbery to serve time in prison, and admits guilt for the deed. The man pleas that he will not commit any crimes again, and is not a danger to society. He claims that he and his wife are expecting a child, and that going to jail would be detrimental to the future of his wife and children. Based on the information given, it is evident that there will be difficulties in making a final decision that will determine this man’s fate.
Life is intense and complicated, and no one can predict what will happen to themselves. The only thing that we can do is to just live our lives to the fullest and hope for the best to come out of it. Few things can be done to choose your path, one way is to avoid it completely. In An Episode of War, people can be drafted and picked to go to war but there are not ways to avoid going down that path. When these people get there they will not know exactly what is happening.
He hit Parvana, too" (45). Even though they knew the risks, they decided to go and try to get Parvana's father out of prison. This shows a lot of courage because they were willing to take the chance of getting beat up, in order to get father back. They knew that they had to at least try and get their father back, no matter the risk. In addition to this event, Parvana
However, his moral courage did not let him change his mind despite his reputation suffering a massive blow in the society. He believed that standing for his morals and what he thought was right regardless of what the entire community was thinking about him. From the start, he already knows that he cannot win the case, but his strong sense of justice and morality is what motivates him to defend Tom in the case with much determination and to give all that he had for the case. He goes ahead to express that it is not because they have been defeated hundred years before they started that they have a reason to they have a reason to try again and win. The author used the term “licked” in most of the expressions to imply defeated.
This is because he feared what Voldemort might do to him if he did not complete them. At one point Voldemort asks Draco to kill Dumbledore. He did not want to, but Voldemort had that power over him. The power of fear controlled him. The reason that the power of fear is not greater than love, although it can easily control someone, is it can only take a power over someone for so long.
In the end, they all realize they could have never changed their fate. Oedipus’s belief in that he had free will and that he could stop the prophecy from coming true ended up being a guideline for fate to get the prophecy to start. McHugh says, “Oedipus, driven by what he believes to be his free will, compulsively continues his search for the murderer despite the warnings he receives.” (no page) Oedipus’s pride also was a factor in his tragic end along with him believing he had free will. He ignored the signs of what was true, he was warned by a prophet and even Jocasta foreshadowed this when she begs him to stop his search. It ended in Jocasta hanging herself from figuring out that Oedipus is her son and she was in an incestuous marriage with her husband’s murderer.
I despise him and those who listen to him. I shall fight alone if I choose,” (Achebe 186). The quote exhibits that Okonkwo did not want the British to interfere with tribal matters by introducing a new lifestyle. He preferred that people continued to hold the traditional culture to a high esteem. This is expanded upon when Okonkwo is willing to fight the British by himself with the knowledge that they had more advanced technology, so he could try to preserve his beliefs.
After the man and boy’s journey ends, they learn that people will do absolutely anything to survive and will create excuses so they will not be blamed for what they are about to do. The book seems to have an underlying theme based on the old saying “survival of the fittest.” ‘Fittest’ can imply many things, but it shows that only the most physically fit will have a better chance of surviving. The word itself has a harsh tone to it, making it seem that to survive you must be able to do whatever it takes to do, even kill someone to ensure your survival. Even though ‘of’ is just a short word in the sentence, it has a big impact to it. ‘Of’ can show many things, but in my point of view it shows that something has possession over it.
Here, Michael was granted a choice. He had the choice extricate his friends from what would have been, most likely death. Without question Michael knew it was his obligation to rescue his friends, even when he knew the adventure was essentially a suicide mission. The contingency that he would rescue his friends and survive was incredibly tenuous, but to him, the idea of losing his friends was far worse than existing at all without them. " 'he kept saying, "We 've got to find jack" He pushed us along, you meant that much to him '" (Evans 182).
He wanted the people to stay under control, because he knew that the state of the nation was fragile. He understood that unruly armed farmers threatening the new government could result in anarchy or a military dictatorship. George Washington did not want everything he fought for to turn into that. Even when a similar situation of agitated soldiers, better trained than Shay’s group of farmers, wanting to engage in a military coup arose and Washington could have gained dictatorial powers, Washington shut it down. Washington also warned that this rebellion was an embarrassment to the new nation and seemed to support the nation’s enemies across the sea’s theory that the people are unfit to govern themselves.
Though, criminals should have second chance in their life to change their bad habits, and be a good influence. But, you can’t always trust them, you can’t have this hope that they will always have a good influence and never break the law again. As you know, ex-cons had made a mistake, those who trusted them before might have thought that the person would make good choices, but it turned out that the person made bad choices and broke the law. So, that’s why ex-cons should not have the rights to vote again. Ex-cons should not have the rights to vote again.
On the other hand, it can show how committed to their cause that person is. In essence, willing to fight for a cause is a great accomplishment because it shows that the person is willing to lose everything for their beliefs, and that is a sign of being strong-willed. Furthermore, Astrid prefers to solve problems as soon as they arise. Astrid came to the realization that Sam could not successfully lead the town himself; this prompted her to rally for the creation of a town council (Grant 53). The need to get tasks done is the sole reason for advancements in society.