ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Governments Of Rome And Carthage

599 Words3 Pages

Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed.
The government structure of Carthage was not based on monarchy and not influenced by the city of Tyre in Phoenicia, but it had a system to elect officials responsible in the assembly. The elite aristocratic was the powerful fingers who held the political, military and judicial power, in the same way, the aristocracy controlled the Roman Republic. (Cartwright, 2016). In the Roman society, the patricians held the wealth and the highest government position. The Roman government structure consisted of two consuls, who govern the republic, a Senate only elected from the wealthy patricians, and the lower class plebeians had no power to participate in the politics and only allowed to vote. The two parties the patricians and the plebeians were not allowed to marry each other, however, through time the plebeians gained some power to elect their own representative at the Senate. (US History, n.d). …show more content…

The Carthage elect two suffetes starting from 5th century BCE, one leads the military during the war and the other one stayed home to govern the city, also the suffetes closely working with the Senate. The Carthage from 200 to300 influential citizens held senate power to consult the suffetes regarding political policy, diplomatic issue, trade and military, and they held the office for life. The other political part of the Carthage was the Aristotle (pentarchies) who were selected to work at the court as a judge, control religious places and oversee the taxation. In addition, the Carthage has an assembly who had the power to vote on decisions made by the suffetes and senates during their meeting in the marketplace, but in the Cartage the only male had citizen but the women and slaves not allowed to obtain the citizenship. (Cartwright,

Show More
Related

  • How Democratic Was The Roman Republic Dbq

    690 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Han China And Roman Empires

    932 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings

    Read More

  • How Did Polybius Show The Perceptiveness Of Rome's Mixed Government

    972 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this particular chapter, Polybius contributes how the Romans were able to rise to power was due to the system of government that was in place. He goes into in-depth analysis of the flaws each system of government had in the past, from kingship, aristocracy, and democracy, as well as pointing out their strong points. He stated that “For it is plain that we must regard as the best constitution that which partakes of all three elements (kingship, aristocracy, and democracy)” (Polybius, VI. 3). He concluded with the idea of a mixed government, where each part of the government will serve as a check of balance to one another.

    Read More

  • Roman Bill Of Rights Essay

    564 Words  | 3 Pages

    The citizens would elect Praetors, these were judges that ruled in the judicial branch and would be voted for each year(AR). Usually only the wealthy Praetors would be elected leaving out the middle and lower class citizens of Rome(AR).Today in The U.S., people can vote on issues that are addressed within America and are also able to vote on who is elected as the president no matter what financial state they are in. In Rome, the lower class citizens also known as the plebeians, were forced into the army and were furious at the fact that

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The American Empire Vs Roman Empire

    315 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Is the United States today very similar to the Roman Empire or only a little bit like it?" The United States today is only a little bit alike the Roman Empire. I say this due to evidence found in a total of 5 different documents. Read on to hear the first piece. First off we had two completely different type of leaders.

    Read More

  • Roman Government Vs Us Government Essay

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are many similarities that can be noticed between the American Nation and the Roman Empire such as the same founding of government and both dominated in military, and economic similarities. Rome is famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and their mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. Rome warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the roman pursuit of victory was determined. Rome gave many good ideas; the senate was ruled by the people of Rome. The Roman Republic Government was a large complex constitution, which was secure by many checks and balances, so that no man could have complete control.

    Read More

  • Relationship Between Rome And Carthage

    1170 Words  | 5 Pages

    Carthage and Rome were two great rivals of the west who also almost equal in strength and resources, situated of the western Mediterranean and Italian Peninsula. Firstly, it is very important to know that Rome 's relations with Carthage down to 264 B.C.E. had been friendly. The two powers had even allied around 500 B.C.E. against the Etruscans. By this treaty Rome recognized the Mediterranean as Carthage 's sphere of influence, and Carthage even claimed a Roman could not wash his hands in the sea without its permission (The flow of History, n. d.).

    Read More

  • What Was The Role Of The Military In Ancient Rome

    1452 Words  | 6 Pages

    The ancient Romans of the later empire claimed to be a republic, meaning that they claimed to be a government where the power was held by the people and their elected representatives rather than a monarch with unlimited power. In reality, that was only somewhat true in ancient Rome. Technically all male citizens had a say, but in reality, only the opinions of the rich men mattered. This brings up the question, who are considered rich men? The people who fit this category were mostly made up of the generals and high-ranking soldiers of the military.

    Read More

  • Carthage And Rome: The Three Punic Wars

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    Introduction Rome and Carthage were almost equal in strength and resources. From the early days of the Republic, Rome and Carthage maintained a friendly relationship and even signed a treaty against Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, who was a threat to both states. Comparison Ancient Carthage was a wealthy state with a small population, it employed foreigners to do the unwanted jobs and relied on foreign mercenaries rather than citizens to do her fighting. The mercenaries did not have a sense of belonging to the Carthaginian nation.

    Read More

  • How Did Antony And Caesar Influence The Functions Of Government

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    As stated by Cassius Dio, “The Roman people had been robbed of their democratic form of government, but had not become a monarchy in the strict sense of the term; Antony and Caesar still controlled affairs on an equal footing, having divided by lot most of the functions of government between them, and though nominally they considered all the rest as belonging to them in common, in reality they were trying to appropriate it to themselves, according as either of them was able to seize any advantage over the other…” (437). Their way of ruling turned Rome into a republic system. Republics are governmental systems that rule over a nation by elected officials. Throughout the history of Julius Caesar and his heir, we see how they used this method

    Read More

  • Patricians Vs Plebeians Research Paper

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Patricians vs. The Plebeian: Economy and Politics The Patricians and Plebeians were the two major classes that formed the Roman Population. As both names suggest, the patricians were noble aristocratic men, while the patrician were just commoners. As in most ancient civilizations, the Romans lived in a state of aristocracy, wherein a few control all the wealth and power, while the common people was left to fend for themselves. These differences in economic status led to a series of conflicts, in which plebeians, composed of the majority of the population, demand equal rights.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ancient Greek And Roman Democracy

    1489 Words  | 6 Pages

    3. Compare and contrast the idea of democracy in Ancient Greece and Rome. Which system was more democratic and why? Democracy is the modern day standard for governmental systems. However up until 500 BCE, the concept of Democracy was a foreign concept, and the great civilizations of that era were run by monarchs, aristocrats, and religious leaders of sorts.

    Read More

  • Greek And Roman Government's Influence On Modern Civilization

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    The government plays a major role in any civilization. The Greeks had several different types of government: Monarchy, Aristocracy, Oligarchy, and Democracy. The Democratic Government is the type of government, which mainly influenced our modern civilization. Democratic Government simply means the citizens have the power, which is the type of government here in the United States of America.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Rome And Alexander The Great

    86 Words  | 1 Pages

    • Alexander the Great was the best orator and a great commanding officer. He won multiple wars whether they were in Asia or at the sea while suppressing revolts from his conquered lands. On the other hand, Constantine the Great was the first Emperor to establish Christianity during his reign in Rome that shifted Western history. Both leaders were termed “Great” because of their own achievement. They had different set of ways in winning wars, improving Ancient Greek and Ancient Rome, and proving peace and prosperity.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Rome And Carthage

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rome and Carthage, the two-superpower at the time, had numbers of similarities, differences, advantages and weakness. In this paper, I will explain the strength of the two-mighty empire which existed in ancient times. In addition to that, what lead Rome to become a naval power and how did they achieve that. Body In the early years of the Roman Republic, a civilization in northern Africa almost as powerful as Rome was expanding her influence in several continents.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Governments Of Rome And Carthage

Open Document