Compare And Contrast The Institutional Structure Of The Declaration Of Independence

1360 Words6 Pages

The birth of the United States of America began with the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration set the standard of justice for which the country would move towards overtime. The Declaration also provided guidance for the constitution. One of the major themes that demonstrates this connection is the institutional design of the executive. This is greatly evidenced through the grievances stated in the Declaration and it’s clear that these greatly influenced the design of the executive in the constitution starting with the term limit, and overall structure of the the executive branch. This structure contains major differences to that of the British king but it also contains distinct similarities that were necessary to keep when it came to a singular and energetic executive. More evidence can be found in Federalist No. 67,70, and 69 in which The Federalist Papers argue in favor of the Executive Branch and many of the arguments made are strongly guided by the principles of the Declaration. The whole point of the revolution was to overthrow the British king who was in essence the executive of England. The result of the king’s overthrow greatly affected the way that people viewed the executive branch. In a sense citizens viewed the president as just another king, and wished to give him no power. …show more content…

The founders knew the Articles of Confederation were not working so there had to be another way to govern the people the way they had originally intended. The role of the executive is to execute laws for the public good and as stated in the Constitution, for the welfare and common defense.1 Under the British king, there was no such thing. The king has become a tyrant and began oppressing the rights of his citizens, or in the former case, subjects. This behavior influenced the design of the executive in the

Open Document