Throughout history, many impactful and memorable empires have arisen. Each empire has its own defining traits that lead to its success or demise. Some empires are very similar, while some posses many different traits. And although some can possess the same quality, their implication and utilization of that quality can create many gaps in the empire’s overall similarity to the other. Two powerful and historically important empires are the Ottoman empire, and the Mughal empire. The two empires share many traits, but they also differ in many ways. However, although similar, the Ottoman empire and Mughal empire are fundamentally different because of their view on religious tolerance, utilization of military successes, and women’s rights. To begin, the Ottoman and Mughal empires differ greatly in …show more content…
Both went through great periods of tolerance. Each empire could be seen as one that accepted people of all religions. At times each empire had rulers who accepted Hindus and Christians with open arms (Gale). However the Mughals had trouble practicing it at some times. “Alienated groups were the Rajputs (a sect of Hindu warriors), the Jats (a distant branch of the Rajputs), and the Marāthās (a sect of Hindus from Maharashtra, a region in west-central India). The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity. Contrary to the Mughals, the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The Ottoman and Ming empire, a few of the world’s empires to go through the history books as one of the greatest. Both empires share similarities on how they ran their government and how they differ between each other. The Ottoman and the Ming empire both displayed grandeur structures to solidify their rule. The Ottoman Empire built the Topkapi Palace, a giant structure that reflected the Ottoman empire’s power. It showed the people the empire’s view of governance, religion, and the influence of Ottoman familial tradition.
They also used their role as protectors of the Islamic faith to justify their expansion into the Indian subcontinent and to gain the support of the religious leaders and scholars. The Mughals also used their military might and their patronage of the arts and culture to expand their empire and to assert their authority over the conquered
The Ottoman and Safavid Empire were two of the most important and significant and major empires in the Islamic world. The Ottoman Empire was the second longest-lived Islamic empires and the Safavid Empire had one of the richest productions of art in the Islamic Empire history. Both empires share many similarities and differences, from their religious practice and affiliations to their expansions and strengths, the two great empires have a very rich history. The Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire share many similarities such as their behavior towards other religions and the way they went about gaining their strength.
They both established themselves as a Islamic Empire. They both were quite religiously tolerant and had different religions in their empires. In the Mughal Empire many people practiced Hinduism and made up a large part of the population. In the beginning The Mughal Empire with Akbar as its ruler had constructed a special House of Worship in which many discussions were carried out between many religions including Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Zoroastrianism. Although later with Aurangzeb as its ruler, it had taken some measures to restrict some Hindu holidays.
Sir Thomas Roe, an English diplomat and ambassador to Constantinople once said "The Ottoman Empire has the body of a sick old man, who tried to appear healthy, although his end was near." Definitely, the Ottoman Empire wouldn't stay strong and young forever. Due its fast and rapid success in expanding, having a strong court system, and having an efficient system of taxation, other great powers in Europe felt threatened. After all, if the empire was expanding and gaining much power quickly, it would be unexceptional for it to invade one of these great powers. Europe sensed the Ottoman jeopardy, so countries such as Britain, France, and Italy allied and plans were made to ensure the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
The early modern era was a time when empires thrived across the globe. The Western Europeans were not the only ones to construct successful empires either. The Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires added to this phenomenon. Although these empires share many similarities, they also have their differences. During the time, 1450 CE -1750 CE, European empires in the Americas and their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts are similar in that they all thrived and united diverse peoples and different in that European empires developed something entirely new, an interacting Atlantic World, while the other empires continued older patterns of historical development.
All empires in history had a high in their history but they all eventually came to their demise. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty both had ways they gained, consolidated and maintained their power while they were at their highest point. They had significant leaders that lead to these successful points. The Ottoman Empire covered parts of Asia, Europe and Africa controlled by their leader named Suleiman.
Han China and Mauryan India had many similarities. They were both bureaucracies, they both had emperors, and both empires established their laws on religious belief. They also had a lot of contrasting ideas for positioning their people, and they had contrasting ideas for their different religious standpoints. One empire put more weight on logic, and the other more on religion.
The Ottoman and Mughal empires both used Islam in their culture, economy, wars, and society. It influenced their art, the way they treated non-Muslims, their motivations for war. It is important to note that both empires were influenced differently by their majority religion. However, both the Ottomans and Mughals were heavily influenced as Islam was a major part of everyday life from the art to the bureaucracy.
The Muslim world expanded tremendously during the 1300s to 1700s. The Ottoman Empire and Safavid Empire were two out of the three empires that had significant changes during these time. Though the Ottoman and Safavid Empire contrast on leaders and ways they rule, they similar on their declination and cultures. In the Ottoman Empire, multiples leaders contributed to the growth of the Empire. Ghazis were warriors for the Islam that followed strict Islamic rules.
Amidst the Classical Era, a time-period in which some of the greatest technologies and communications were introduced, reigned a multitude of empires. Two specific empires were of the greatest to have ever existed: the Persian Empire, which lasted approximately 200 years, and the Maurya Empire, which fell after about 150 years. Individually, the empires had their own accomplishments and their own legacy, however, there existed key similarities and differences between the three empires, especially politically. The Persian Empire utilized a bureaucratic system where the empire was divided into multiple sections, similarly, the Maurya Empire used a system that fractionalized its empire. Nevertheless, the two empires differed in their religious
The Roman, Chinese and Indian empire are the three main empires that exist in the past and inspired the rest of the empires that came afterwards. The Roman empire used trade and government to get where it was. The Chinese empire used legalism and a strong army. The Indian empire used religion to be successful. An empire consists of many different features, but there are some specific key features that makes an empire a strong and powerful empire and it usually consist of a strong military, effective leader, religion, trade and a lot more different features.
It is universally acknowledged that society is made up of two parts—the men and the women. The Ottoman empire was no exception. From the 13th century to the early 20th, the Ottoman empire held a central role in the world of global politics, commerce, and culture. They conquered vast lands, spread Islam, and created a rich and glimmering culture. But, one must recognize that women, because they make up half of the population, played an important role in Ottoman society as romantic partners and financial agent; however, women were also dealt the role of being subservient to men.
Antagonism can be defined as active hostility or opposition. India has a long tradition of religious tension. One of the most significant sustained religious conflicts has been between the Hindus and Muslims. This essay will focus on the causes of the Hindu-Muslim antagonism, and will at same time assess the quote of Sir S.A Khan. 1.