Compare And Contrast The Parthenon And The Pantheon

Unit 2 Written Assignment

For this paper I have analyzed two renowned temples which can be considered typical examples of classical architecture. Some features of this style of architecture have been used later, featured in neo-classical architecture.

Before making a comparison it is important to introduce the background of both examples being studied, the Parthenon and the Pantheon.

The Parthenon of Ancient Greece The Parthenon temple, was part of a major building campaign which began around 450 BC. Being one of the key surviving examples of classical architecture, it has since 1975 been undergoing a major restoration funded by both the EU and Greek government. This major project shows the significance of this structure even today.

As recently as the 19th century, French engineer and historical historian Auguste Choisy once described the Parthenon as "the supreme effort of genius in pursuit of beauty" (Hadingham, 2008).

The function of the temple is believed to be a dedication to Athena, the patron goddess of Athens. Temples such as the Parthenon, viewers did not enter the temple itself. It was intended only to view the temple from the outside. Those fortunate enough to see the statues inside only did so by glimpsing through open doors (Ancient-Greece.org, n.d.).

The columns are a particularly distinctive feature of Greek classical architecture, often used to support a pediment. This feature is a triangular section support by pillars, and is found on both