Whilst many believe terrorism is a new phenomenon, the term ‘terrorism’ goes back several hundred years to the French Revolution. Concentrating on the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) and Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), this essay will compare and contrast the different strategies and tactics of terrorist groups from the 1970’s to the present day. In doing so, the essay will demonstrate consistency in strategy amongst terrorist groups – the search for political recognition despite differing tactical approaches to their campaigns. The essay will firstly begin by breaking down why the ideologies are similar and how they begin to form the overall strategy. Next, how the differences in media coverage have starved or helped each …show more content…
The media and support are key for any terrorist group wanting to climb the political ladder and gain legitimacy within its own right. Since the 1970’s, terrorist groups have utilised the media to the best of their ability. History has shown that if a terrorist group can control/manipulate its own media, there is potential to create local and wider sympathy for its cause. The IRA released the 'Green Book', detailing training, tactics and targets, as appose to ISIS, who have a full wing dedicated to its media outlet today. This proves ISIS is taking itself to a full worldwide co-operation rather than just a set of ideas for a caliphate. ISIS’s media department uses the internet to capitalise on the various social mediums for its primary audience. Using YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, ISIS can reach all over the world at mere clicks of a button. Steve Rose highlighted this in 2014, ISIS are using the West’s media tools to grasp the attention of potential recruits outside the Middle East. Understanding the importance of the media has certainly helped project ISIS into the lime-light. Running alongside the internet social push, is the “Dabiq” magazine. A propaganda led magazine ‘published in English by an ISIS media arm.’ In stark contrast, the IRA had a media ban during the latter half of ‘The Troubles’ (1968-1998, used to …show more content…
Messages are to make the world understand that you do not want to be occupied by another state, wanting to be recognized as a caliphate in disputed territories. The message is delivered in the same way, through the medium of media coverage on the back of terrorist actions. Shootings, bombings, knife attacks, anything that sparks human interest in the wake of destruction. The tactic of using terror to gain popularity ever grows in the eyes of these organizations, which was perfected by the IRA from the 70’s to the late 90’s (‘the troubles’). The IRA used terror consciously, suggesting they chose their fights and the grounds on which they exploited their enemy.The tactic to utilize guerrilla warfare and not traditional warfare acted as a force multiplier and gained much public interest. Comparatively, ISIS have used terror throughout the globe rather than being localized to either colonial or England. To invoke fear and excitement (for supporters) to their cause, they have used the tactic of terror from the beginning. This tactic has helped place ISIS firmly in the medias headlines thus bolstering the media offensive
(2017). He expands on how terrorists have the advantage of relatively easy access to weapons, and the easy communication, including social media and TV. Lastly, he argues that poverty and instability in the Middle East helps recruit more
Muckraking Isis There is a serious problem in the world today involving Isis. If it gets worse, which it probably will the whole world could be in a big dilemma. It’s only in a couple countries right now, but it could easily go worldwide. Isis is a terrorist group kind of like Al Qaeda. They are heartless monsters who are hungry for power and want to control everything.
As we have seen throughout history, it can be used to promote unity and patriotism, but it can also be used to justify war and perpetuate hatred and discrimination. Today, with the rise of social media and online platforms, propaganda has become even more pervasive and challenging to identify. The impact of propaganda on cultural developments can also be seen in the way it has
Gork & Kilcullen become concerned about radical ideologies after 9/11 attack and look for ways how to counter similar attacks. During the article, ? Who?s winning the Battle for Narrative? Al-Qaida versus the United States and Its Allies?, the authors are concerned the West is losing the battle due to poor communication with the Muslim world. They recognize the communication problem and suggest from a single counter-narrative to communicate to specific audiences (Gork & Kilcullen, 2009, pg.
Online recruitment is becoming extremely popular mostly for muslim women who are isolated in their homes and unable to reach ISIS recruitment officers (Wood). Along with online recruitment, ISIS post numerous videos to tell their beliefs and also show punishment for those who are against
The war against Iraq proved to show truth to this statement. The film Control Room depicted events that occurred during that era. Propaganda was used by both the Iraqi news station, Al Jazeera, and American new station FOX, to convey the views that they wanted their citizens to have of the war. The purpose of this reaction paper was to discuss propaganda, and the effects of the American and Iraqi war had on the two countries. Key points touched upon were: (1) innocent people affected by war, (2) American soldiers who suffer and their families, and (3) America “helping” other countries but struggles to help their own people.
A key underlying commitment ratified by a number of governments is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This Convention has 54 articles that cover all aspects of a child’s life and set out the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights that all children everywhere are entitled to. It also explains how adults and governments must work together to make sure all children can enjoy all their rights. Many of the principles from this have been incorporated into statutory law.
Americans Versus Americans Terrorism is hardly ever looked at lightly. When most Americans think of terrorist the first thing that comes to mind is the September 11 attacks. What many fail to recognize are the numerous incidents in which the terrorist attacks were committed by individuals who were United States citizens or permanent residents of the United States. Homegrown terrorism can be motivated by numerous reasons ; Economic issues,such as losing a job or blocked mobility,religious convictions,racial prejudice,and supremacist goals,political standpoints and even the deathof a close family member. Today this issue is at its peak and growing rapidly and it does not seem to be slowing down anytime soon.
The term terrorism is inextricably intertwined with the notion of foreign actors unleashing widespread disaster on American soil. This notion is not unfounded and carries a very real and very dangerous threat to the US. While the US must of course be constantly vigilant with regard to the threat of an attack emanating from a foreign land, the US must also consider an equally dangerous threat that lurks in our own backyard: the domestic terrorist. Make no mistake, the use of the word domestic should by no means diminish, and should in no way normalize the malevolency these groups perpetuate. One is tempted to limit one’s thinking regarding domestic terrorism to the latest news story and how that may affect the US in the here and now.
It is not unusual to see headlines in newspapers such as 'I will go back to Britain... and will carry on cutting heads off ' (Wahid Daily Mail, 2014) and '250 JIHADIS BACK IN BRITAIN ' (Penrose & Wright Daily Mirror, 2015). With these eye-catching headlines the general public immediately get the sense of fear and feeling unsafe, as there is an uncertainty around the subject it causes a moral panic. This shows the impact that the media can have on spreading a moral panic by installing fear into the readers
The middle east has been shown as home to all terrorists, dangerous and waiting to destroy our country with any chance they get. The media finds single instances and spins them into complete stories. These stories are then expanded, and plastered across newspapers, websites, and TV. But yet many people have no want to look further, past the blindfold that the media has so carefully made.
All terrorist acts involve violence or the threat of violence. Terrorism is precisely designed to have a broad psychological effect beyond the
To rebuttal, minority groups created a symbol for a united front. They used an Arabic letter ‘N’, ύ, to reclaim Christianity and show solidarity (Williams, PH.D, 2015). Even through opposition, ISIS has never let up on their strong-arm. They create organization through use of their trained militia. The Islamic State is working towards building up their caliphate and suppressing everyone else.
When the government wants to achieve its ideal of certain policy, it might use messages that give positive light to this policy. The purpose of these messages is to gain acceptance from the people, because their lack of acceptance will undermine the legitimacy of the government. Once the propaganda achieves its goal, however, the people will view the policy favorably. They will be less likely to revolt against the government. Thus, the government can maintain its legitimacy and domination while pursuing policy that it favors.
ROLE OF MEDIA AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS IN FUTURE CONFLICTS Introduction 1. Effective and imaginative manipulation of media in the decade has strengthened its status as one of the most important pillars of the state. The media blitz as employed by the US during its operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, the consequent effects have encouraged contemporary armies to use it as an important tool to support military operations to attain desired effects. The glimpse of the same has also been witnessed during the Kargil conflict. 2.