Compare And Contrast The War Of The Roses Essay

Commonly, wars or battles are fought to gain power over a country. The Wars of the Roses were a different kind of wars that involved two families fighting over the English Throne. The houses of York and Lancaster fought in an ongoing battle for around thirty years. Previous wars led to the fall of the English Throne, leading to several conflicts between the two families. The numerous battles didn’t resolve the disagreement between the two, but made things even worse than before. Conclusively, the battles created more struggles in the English Throne than before the conflict began. There have been other family feuds in history that are just like The Wars of the Roses. Even though they are all different, each feud proves that fighting doesn’t resolve disagreements. The Wars of the Roses involved an unnecessary family feud for the English Throne that caused after effects following the wars.

Both houses claimed to have a right to the English Throne, which started the inner rivalry between the families. “The two houses claimed the throne through the descent of Edward III son’s” (“Wars of the Roses” 1). To put in another way, the two families were connected through a very long and complicated family tree. “Neither side used a rose as their particular symbol” (“Wars of the Roses” 1). However, each family was named after

The Wars of the Roses prove again and again the awful reality of fighting. The Wars of the Roses seem to echo other wars in the sense that all its battles were pointless. In the end, the Lancaster’s claimed the victory. However, they gained very little. Over the time period of the wars, the death toll has said to have been nearly 50,000 men. The struggle over the English Throne caused many changes affecting the country, population, and Parliament. Therefore, the Wars of the Roses involved an unnecessary family feud for the English Throne that caused after effects following the