When the descendants of ours will ever know that their lives are about to ditch this burden and they can start discovering their meanings of lives? Naturalists corroborated that the world started with the Big Bang and the existence of God is not germane. Since there is no creator of both this world and our lives, who will send the message to us or the future generation about the end of this mission and the moment has arrived to abandon the cursed past life? Neither the DNA of ours, the environment, nor the past generation can tell because why would they know? There is only one possibility left and that is our intelligence.
Scientists cannot recreate evolution, therefore, it can only be a theory and can only be trusted if a person has faith that it is true. If evolution was a true event that happened, there should be many transitional species today that scientists could study. Today scientists don’t have any live animals that are thought to be a transitional species that is going to evolve into something else. With similar species thought to come from a common ancestor, all traits of one of the species should be found in the other species in about the same area. There are many cases where two species have many things in common, but the two species also have some very distinct characteristics that are unbridgeable between the two.
(Manafi Anari, 2003, p.14) In the early stage of translation study, there had been no specific definition and classification for “untranslatability”. It is British scholar Catford who first elaborates on this issue. In his dichotomy model of untranslatability which is the most important and logical theory about the topic, Catford identifies two kinds of untranslatability, namely, linguistic untranslatability (LU) and CU. He describes that LU arises when “failure to find a TL equivalent is due entirely to differences between the source language and target language” (1965, p.98). Since it “has nothing to do with cultural differences in the wider sense; it is purely linguistic” (Ibid, p.97), LU is not discussed in this paper.
The creation story retold by evolution does little to bridge the distance between faith and science, although “creation scientists” have tried, who, according to Ronald Numbers at the University of Wisconsin, “compress the history of life on earth into less than ten thousand years. To accomplish this, they attribute most of the fossil record to the brief period of the flood and its aftermath. They believe that the majority of plants and animals buried sequentially in the stratified rocks once lived together in the antediluvian world; thus these relics do not represent successive populations of flora and fauna spanning millions of years, as evolutionists and most other creationists would assert.” However, for David Mindell, a professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, the differences between creationists and evolutionists cannot be bridged. Call it a “cultural conflict.” “Creationists would like supernatural causation, legitimate within religious culture, to be admitted as a legitimate hypothesis for empirical research, within the culture of science. To do so would run counter to the definition of science, which requires tangible evidence and testable hypotheses.” “Common descent for all organisms knocked humans from their elevated position as the intentional and favored creation of a divine being, wholly distinct and superior in origins, capabilities, and destiny from other forms of life.” James Innell Packer, an English theologian, however, did not seek to reconcile
Since cuneiform is the first script, it is responsible for almost all the other scripts of all time (not hieroglyphs though, they were thought to have been created with no knowledge of cuneiform). The components of writing systems and categories like phonograms, logograms etc. are all present because of
Abstract In this essay, I will be discussing on the birth of Kitsch, whether it is historically dated, having made its appearance hundred and fifty years old, or is it as old as art itself. As we know, there are no definite answer or explanation as to when and how it came about. There are arguments that kitsch has accompanied art throughout its history. For some, it is a distinctly modern phenomenon. Introduction What is Kitsch?
What if you let to know that there is a mathematical way of addressing doomsday, which is fully based on probability and had nothing to do with climate change or nuclear attack. Doomsday is (in religious beliefs) the last day of the world’s existence. Doomsday argument is a statement of reasoning that seeks the answer of a simple question that, what is our birth rank in the total humans born so far. Doomsday argument is a probabilistic argument that claims to predict that total numbers of human that will ever exist on earth are estimated by the number of humans born
Daniel Wilson , President of Toronto University College, was the first one to introduce the term in 1851. Paul Tournal originally coined the term in describing the finds he had made in the caves of southern France.  There are no written documents that exist during this kind of time and the material remains are the only basis to study their ways of life. It includes the human body itself found by most archaeologists, hunting tools which was used in their search for food, paintings, sculptures found in most caves, etc. Human prehistory encompasses a period of time in the human existence namely: Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron age respectively.
Human evolution is the origin the human beings. It shows how far back we as humans originated. The study of evolution has developed as Homo sapiens are able to look back and find out how we originated. Without the research of many scientists such as Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace. There would have not been any explanation which explained how we share similarities with other hominids.
According to Selvarajah (n.d.), animals do not use language but only produce sound. There is no other language can compete human languages. However, the origin of human language still mystery until now. According to Yule (2006 p.1), spoken language develop first than written language around 100,000 – 50,000 years ago but the evidences and artifacts about how language back in early stage are never found until now. The nature about human language is it comes naturally in our life.